On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:38:31PM +0200, serge wrote:
>Hallo Christopher,
>
> The support for unnamed structure/union is brocken!
>
> The warning only (-Wall) is generated and corresponding field is ignored!
While you are obviously quite excited about this, you haven't provided
any details. It
Hallo Christopher,
The support for unnamed structure/union is brocken!
The warning only (-Wall) is generated and corresponding field is ignored!
The old GCC compiler (before 2.95.3 if I not mistake) reports the error.
In the previous 2.95.3 .. 3.2 and in the current GCC shipped with CYGWIN
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Christopher,
>
>Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 um 17:24 schriebst du:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
Problems go to the cygwi
Hallo Christopher,
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 um 17:24 schriebst du:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
>>> Problems go to the cygwin mailing list as always.
>>
>>c-lex.h is missing in the source package.
Hallo Christopher,
On Mittwoch, 2003-09-17 at 23:32 you wrote:
c-lex.h is missing in the source package.
>>> It's not available in the CVS repository on gcc.gnu.org, AFAICT.
>>> Nothing that I build uses it, so this shouldn't be an issue. Apparently
>>> objc builds are broken for 3.3.1.
>>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 05:50:41PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Christopher schrieb:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
Problems go to the cygwin mailing list as always.
>>>
>>>c-lex.h is missing in t
Christopher schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
>>> Problems go to the cygwin mailing list as always.
>>
>>c-lex.h is missing in the source package.
>>
>>http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
>> Problems go to the cygwin mailing list as always.
>
>c-lex.h is missing in the source package.
>
>http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=c-lex.h
It's not available i
Hallo Christopher,
Am Samstag, 13. September 2003 um 02:27 schriebst du:
[...]
> Anyway, it seems to work fine. Usual caveats apply.
> Problems go to the cygwin mailing list as always.
c-lex.h is missing in the source package.
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=c-lex.h
Gerrit
Danny Smith wrote:
Ada, Java, ObjC are affected as well as C++. Also, note that any C++ code
that uses iostreams or STL will be using exceptions. Oh yes, and new/delete use
exceptions.
That is, any C++ code. 'Kay.
But garden variety C should not be affected.
Linking to w32api dll's certainly is
--- Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Danny Smith wrote:
>
> > gcc 3.2-3 used Dwarf2 exceptions, which worked most of the time. (In fact,
> > I don't recall any bug reports at all on cygwin list). But it didn't work
> > with w32api callbacks, nor with some combinations of compiler swit
Hallo Rolf,
Am Sonntag, 14. September 2003 um 01:07 schriebst du:
> Danny Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatib
Danny Smith wrote:
gcc 3.2-3 used Dwarf2 exceptions, which worked most of the time. (In fact,
I don't recall any bug reports at all on cygwin list). But it didn't work
with w32api callbacks, nor with some combinations of compiler switches
(notably -mcpu=i586 or -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args and
-
Danny Smith wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>
>>>Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
>>>can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwi
Charles Wilson wrote:
Rolf Campbell wrote:
Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwin g++.
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/TestSucessListener.cpp: undefined
reference to `___gxx_personality_v0'
/c/temp
Rolf Campbell wrote:
Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwin g++.
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/TestSucessListener.cpp: undefined
reference to `___gxx_personality_v0'
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppu
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>
>>>Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
>>>can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwi
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwin g++.
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/TestSucessListener.cpp: undefined
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
>can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwin g++.
>
>/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/TestSucessListener.cpp: undefined
>reference to `___gxx_
Is this new gcc supposed to be ABI compatible with 3.2.x? Because I
can't link in libraries compiled with an older version of cygwin g++.
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/TestSucessListener.cpp: undefined
reference to `___gxx_personality_v0'
/c/temp/cppunit-1.8.0/src/cppunit/../../include/cppu
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've made test versions of gcc 3.3.1 (and the accompanying gcc-mingw
> package) available via setup. This version is the 3.3.1 release plus
> the usual cygwin + mingw patches -- most of which come from Danny Smith.
> The set of custom patches necessary for cygwin and mi
I've made test versions of gcc 3.3.1 (and the accompanying gcc-mingw
package) available via setup. This version is the 3.3.1 release plus
the usual cygwin + mingw patches -- most of which come from Danny Smith.
The set of custom patches necessary for cygwin and mingw is shrinking
all of the time.
23 matches
Mail list logo
