Hallo Christopher, On Mittwoch, 2003-09-17 at 23:32 you wrote:
>>>>c-lex.h is missing in the source package. >>> It's not available in the CVS repository on gcc.gnu.org, AFAICT. >>> Nothing that I build uses it, so this shouldn't be an issue. Apparently >>> objc builds are broken for 3.3.1. >>Broken? I compiled the source package from mingw.org and at least the >>'hello world' test in objc works fine. > If you check out the sources from the gcc repository you will note that > c-lex.h is not available on the 3.3 branch. >>Is there some more information about this somewhere? > I don't have any information. Like I said, AFAICT, this file isn't > necessary for my build. Maybe Danny has some insight. Perhaps he added > c-lex.h into his source package since he builds objective-c. It is not in the 3.3.1 archive I got from mingw.org but the version of objc in the 3.3.1-1 source package distributed via the cygwin mirrors requires c-lex.h which is not included in the original 3.3.1 package from gnu.org or the CVS as you found. Hmmm, I guess objc-parse.c is meant to be regenerated and not to be fetched readily from CVS, anyway also objc-parse.y in the 3.3.1-1 tarball is dated 01.06.2002 which seems pretty old (my versions date is 14.05.2003). I used the latest available MinGw version now again (just the objc subdirectory) and it builds without problems. I did a diff on the two directories and they are different. Probably your gcc/objc-parse.y and gcc/objc-parse.c were not updated recently? Now I wonder if it is broken for you because of this or don't you build it anyway because it is broken elswhere? That is why I asked for more information about the breakage. HTH, Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
