Re: cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 00:46:06 -0000 Issue 10882 - virus alert

On 2018-06-30 10:09, David Stacey wrote: > On 30/06/18 13:19, Richard Watt wrote: >> Did anyone else get a virus warning from the cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 >> 00:46:06 - Issue 10882? > It's an unsolicited invoice from someone you've never heard of. Of course it's > malware :-) > It's an attachm

Re: cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 00:46:06 -0000 Issue 10882 - virus alert

On 30/06/18 13:19, Richard Watt wrote: Did anyone else get a virus warning from the cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 00:46:06 - Issue 10882? It's an unsolicited invoice from someone you've never heard of. Of course it's malware :-) It's an attachment to this post [1], compressed with gzip. The

Re: cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 00:46:06 -0000 Issue 10882 - virus alert

Hi, Did anyone else get a virus warning from the cygwin Digest 25 Jun 2018 00:46:06 - Issue 10882? I'm using avast! antivirus on Windows 7 SP1 64-bit and it flagged up detecting a "Win32:Malware-gen" threat, but a Google Search reveals a MalwareBytes forum thread saying that this is a false p

Virus alert

Dear: cygwin@cygwin.com This is to inform you that virus activities has been detected in your email account. Our general mail server scaners has identified that your email account is infected with the Trojan.GenericKD.30434110 virus that infects all Adobe PDF file attachmen

Alert

- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Dear at&t, The Classic version of AT&T Mail will be replaced by our new version on 26 September 2017. So it's time to upgrade, before you lose your email access. Log-in Restore Thanks for choosing AT&T Libby Joe, Managing

lftp error SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpected

a heads up and see if that helps you out on solving the problem related to the SSL error message. log of error message received. Resolving host address... 1 address found: 204.90.130.188 Connecting to sftp.am.gxsics.com (204.90.130.188) port 6366 SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpect

Re: lftp error SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpected message

> Hello everyone, > > I have been trying to use lftp to connect sftp.am.gxsics.com but just > get the error SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpected message > when using cygwin built of lftp (which uses OpenSSL). I then found a > build that was done with GNUTLS with 4.3 version of

lftp error SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpected message

Hello everyone, I have been trying to use lftp to connect sftp.am.gxsics.com but just get the error SSL_connect: sslv3 alert unexpected message when using cygwin built of lftp (which uses OpenSSL). I then found a build that was done with GNUTLS with 4.3 version of lftp and this can connect with

Re: CreateProcessA failed, errno 11 [BLODA alert]

David Rothenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So you are not experiencing any fork() problems any longer? Really >> strange. What kind of sh*** the ATI drivers must be ... > Nope. I could easily reproduce the problem by building subversion > 1.5.0-rc4. My PIDs would get up into the 300,000s an

Re: CreateProcessA failed, errno 11 [BLODA alert]

On 5/1/2008 1:57 PM, Thomas Plank wrote: David Rothenberger wrote: On 5/1/2008 1:17 PM, Thomas Plank wrote: I have NO kind of the mentioned "BLODA" software installed on my system and my cygwin installation worked now for nearly 4 years. (Windows XP SP2, all security updates) I had the same

RE: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

On 21 August 2007 19:58, PTBluster wrote: > Dave, Greg: > Thanks for checking. Also IROffer/cygcrypt-0.dll trogan was not detected by > my scans with Spybot or AVG. > The strange thing is that IROffer seems to be a ligit trogan and has been > part of Ad-aware's defs since at least mid 2006. Perhap

RE: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

gcrypt-0.dll-ad-aware-trojan-alert-tf4305705.html#a12261020 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.co

RE: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

On 21 August 2007 16:56, Greg Chicares wrote: > On 2007-08-21 15:27Z, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote: >>> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-

Re: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

On 2007-08-21 15:27Z, Dave Korn wrote: > On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote: > >> On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote: >> >>> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses >>> cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not >>> find much.

RE: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote: > On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote: > >> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses >> cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not >> find much. I think cygcrypt-0.dll is a legit library file

RE: Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote: > I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses > cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not > find much. I think cygcrypt-0.dll is a legit library file so I am wondering > if this hit is significant?

Cygcrypt-0.dll ad-aware trojan alert

0.dll located at c:\cygwin\bin\ dated 10/19/2003 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cygcrypt-0.dll-ad-aware-trojan-alert-tf4305705.html#a12256294 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-s

ALERT: dangerous message stopped

The IT department has automatically stopped an email sent by you to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because it contained malicious code that could damage the recipient’s machine. If you require further information, please contact the IT helpdesk. Stopped message details: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent:

Re: Updated: OpenSSH-4.4p1-1 (FAQ ALERT)

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 13 11:20, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Oct 11 16:20, Wells, Roger K. wrote: > > >>When I installed this my previous installation broke and now the sshd > > >>server stops immediately when it is started. Any hints w

Re: FAQ ALERT Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.122-1

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:43:45PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >On 10/11/06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Good point, Brian. If anything qualifies as a FAQ, this certainly does. >>Joshua, would you be willing to write something up about the philosophy >>of MS-DOS and Cygwin? Known gotchas

Re: FAQ ALERT Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.122-1

On 10/11/06, Christopher Faylor wrote: Good point, Brian. If anything qualifies as a FAQ, this certainly does. Joshua, would you be willing to write something up about the philosophy of MS-DOS and Cygwin? Known gotchas would be a good thing to include, even if they were only examples. This lo

Re: FAQ ALERT Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.122-1

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Good point, Brian. If anything qualifies as a FAQ, this certainly >>does. Joshua, would you be willing to write something up about the >>philosophy of MS-DOS and Cygwin? Known gotchas would be a good thin

Re: FAQ ALERT Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.122-1

Christopher Faylor wrote: > Good point, Brian. If anything qualifies as a FAQ, this certainly does. > Joshua, would you be willing to write something up about the philosophy > of MS-DOS and Cygwin? Known gotchas would be a good thing to include, > even if they were only examples. I'll see about

FAQ ALERT Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.0.122-1

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:23:56PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >>>I've tried his test case and Mark is right. When a symlink is created >>>with a win32 path, vim can not create the swapfile. When a symlink is >>>created with POSIX filenames there is no problem. >> >>Well of cour

Re: chmod, chown doesn't work with 1.5.21-1 (FAQ alert)

On 8/24/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: FWIW, I was going to suggest that you look at the relevant FAQ entry (), but then I realized that the entry is horribly out of date, and doesn't mention filesystem types at all (the only place they are mention

Re: chmod, chown doesn't work with 1.5.21-1 (FAQ alert)

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Auteria Wallace Winzer Jr. wrote: > I just installed 1.5.21-1 on a new system. On my old > system I had installed previous versions and I didn't > have any issues with chown/chmod. Now with a brand new > install it seems after executing chmod when viewing > the results it show

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old... (gold star alert)

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:24:04PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > >Linda Walsh wrote: > > > >> Nobody like to hear "oh, it's fixed in the latest build, but > >> not in the released product." > > > >Whether they like it or not doesn't change the s

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old... (gold star alert)

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:24:04PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Linda Walsh wrote: > >> Nobody like to hear "oh, it's fixed in the latest build, but >> not in the released product." > >Whether they like it or not doesn't change the situation at all. The >fact remains that very often reported p

Re: GPL Alert: Super

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Michael Schaap wrote: > On 18-Jun-2006 22:35, »Q« wrote: > > Michael Schaap wrote: > > > > > http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html > > > It's a GUI around a bunch of command-line video file editing > > > tools. > > > > > > Installs both cygwin1.dll and cygz.dll in the System32

Re: GPL Alert: Super

On 18-Jun-2006 22:35, »Q« wrote: Michael Schaap wrote: http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html It's a GUI around a bunch of command-line video file editing tools. Installs both cygwin1.dll and cygz.dll in the System32 folder. Can't find any mention of source code on the web site. I asked about

Re: GPL Alert: Super

On Friday 16 June 2006 08:37, Brian Dessent wrote: > > False. If you provide cygwin1.dll you must provide its source. > Period. You can't say "it's free software, get it from cygwin.com". > You must provide a copy yourself (the exact version corresponding to the > DLL you distribute), on your ser

Re: GPL Alert: Super

Lloeki wrote: > He doesn't have to provide source code > for distributed binaries either, but just point out that it's free software, > and if ever asked for source code, point at a place to get it. False. If you provide cygwin1.dll you must provide its source. Period. You can't say "it's free

Re: GPL Alert: Super

On Thursday 15 June 2006 13:09, Michael Schaap wrote: > http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html > It's a GUI around a bunch of command-line video file editing tools. > > Installs both cygwin1.dll and cygz.dll in the System32 folder. Can't > find any mention of source code on the web site. > > (I won'

GPL Alert: Super

http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html It's a GUI around a bunch of command-line video file editing tools. Installs both cygwin1.dll and cygz.dll in the System32 folder. Can't find any mention of source code on the web site. (I won't even mention that it distributes these open source command-li

Re: Cygwin and Windows Vista Beta 2 (FAQ alert)

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:01:01AM -0400, Robert Pendell wrote: >Maybe someone can offer to fix this now that Vista has gone into the >public beta phase. I can post links here if someone asks for them. It's extremely unlikely. We don't usually try to get Cygwin working on moving targets. We hav

Re: [FAQ ALERT] Win32_Winsock depracated...

On 5/30/06, Dave Korn wrote: ... for quite some time now; here's an update to the related faq entry. Thanks, it's great to get patches like this. It's updated now: http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.api.html#faq.api.winsock -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem rep

RE: [FAQ ALERT] Win32_Winsock depracated...

On 30 May 2006 15:53, Dave Korn wrote: >2006-05-30 Dave Korn Doh! Wrong date on the ChangeLog entry. I meant today. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygw

[FAQ ALERT] Win32_Winsock depracated...

... for quite some time now; here's an update to the related faq entry. 2006-05-29 Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * faq-api.xml (faq.api.winsock): Replace references to depracated Win32_Winsock macro with __USE_W32_WINSOCK, and enlarge on details. cheers, DaveK --

Re: [FAQ alert] RE: segfault on memory intensive programs

On 4/1/06, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 3/30/06, Dave Korn wrote: > > As to the FAQ entry, it really needs a little alteration. Ping JDF! > > > > It should make clear that those parameters are in bytes. The example of a > > 4k stack and 1k heap is a bit unrealistic and it might be more

Re: [FAQ alert] RE: segfault on memory intensive programs

On 3/30/06, Dave Korn wrote: > As to the FAQ entry, it really needs a little alteration. Ping JDF! > > It should make clear that those parameters are in bytes. The example of a > 4k stack and 1k heap is a bit unrealistic and it might be more productive to > show people how to make exes with /

RE: [FAQ alert] RE: segfault on memory intensive programs

On 30 March 2006 15:49, Pete wrote: > --- Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pete, please don't do ^^ that. If you quote someone's email address in raw text, it gets archived on the mailinglist web archive, and then spam-harvesters get it, and then that person gets a BOATLOAD more sp

Re: [FAQ alert] RE: segfault on memory intensive programs

--- Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 21. > > How can I adjust the heap/stack size of an > application? > > If you need to change the maximum amount of memory > available to Cygwin, see > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-maxmem.html. BTW, is there a corresponding way of specif

[FAQ alert] RE: segfault on memory intensive programs

On 30 March 2006 14:51, Pete wrote: > It reports back 1536 MB. Very strange! The registry > setting appears to not be having an effect. 1.5 Gig is about the most it's possible to get under 'doze. The address space of the processor is 4gig, the upper 2 gig (addr >= 0x8000) belong to the

Re: "Bad system call" error FAQ alert? (Was Re: Fatal error when trying to initialise PostgreSQL in cygwin)

On 1/13/06, Joshua Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/13/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > On Jan 13 12:44, Adrian Maier wrote: > > > > /usr/bin/initdb: line 564: 3312 Bad system call > > > > "$PGPATH"/postgres > > > > > >

Re: "Bad system call" error FAQ alert? (Was Re: Fatal error when trying to initialise PostgreSQL in cygwin)

On 1/13/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jan 13 12:44, Adrian Maier wrote: > > > /usr/bin/initdb: line 564: 3312 Bad system call > > > "$PGPATH"/postgres > > > > Did you read /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql-8.0.4.README? > > I wonder if th

"Bad system call" error FAQ alert? (Was Re: Fatal error when trying to initialise PostgreSQL in cygwin)

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 13 12:44, Adrian Maier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > When I try to initialise the postgresql database cluster with initdb > > it generates the following errors : > > > > $ initdb -D pgsql_data/ > > [snip] > > /usr/bin/initdb: line 564: 3312 Bad sy

Re: Folder ftp%3a%2f%2fftp.sunsite.utk.edu%2fpub%2fcygwin remains after install (FAQ alert)

On 11/26/05, Joshua Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/22/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > The script you're thinking of is Michael A. Chase's clean_setup.pl. > > > Unfortunately, Googling for it mostly turns up references to it in the > > > mailing list archives, and the actual s

Re: Folder ftp%3a%2f%2fftp.sunsite.utk.edu%2fpub%2fcygwin remains after install (FAQ alert)

On 11/22/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > The script you're thinking of is Michael A. Chase's clean_setup.pl. > > Unfortunately, Googling for it mostly turns up references to it in the > > mailing list archives, and the actual site comes up only at the bottom of > > the page. It would be nice if t

Re: Folder ftp%3a%2f%2fftp.sunsite.utk.edu%2fpub%2fcygwin remains after install (FAQ alert)

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote: > > > Christian Franke wrote: > > > > > Somewhat offtopic and probably FAQ: > > > The local package cache fills up with outdated (no longer in setup.ini) > > > versions. > > > Is there any hidden setup.exe fu

Re: Folder ftp%3a%2f%2fftp.sunsite.utk.edu%2fpub%2fcygwin remains after install (FAQ alert)

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote: > Christian Franke wrote: > > > Somewhat offtopic and probably FAQ: > > The local package cache fills up with outdated (no longer in setup.ini) > > versions. > > Is there any hidden setup.exe functionality or cleanup script available > > to delete old pack

Re: OLOCA-unlisted acronym alert: "NP" = "No problem"

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:32:49PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > NP. Added to the list. Ditto. :-) > Other earlier appearances in (not an exclusive list): > [snip] Thanks for the list of uses -- however, I think this is old enough to

OLOCA-unlisted acronym alert: "NP" = "No problem" (was: Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

Other earlier appearances in (not an exclusive list): http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-10/msg00157.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00492.html (kind of) http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01483.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01952.html http://sou

Re: non-OLOCA acronym alert (was: Re: Proposal singular-3.0.0-1 (final directory structure))

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Oliver Wienand wrote: > > JFTR: Packages required: gcc, gmp, make, flex, bison, perl, readline, > Yeah, I noticed it. The OLOCA isn't meant to be all-inclusive. FWIW,

non-OLOCA acronym alert (was: Re: Proposal singular-3.0.0-1 (final directory structure))

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Oliver Wienand wrote: > JFTR: Packages required: gcc, gmp, make, flex, bison, perl, readline, -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cy

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

On Aug 3, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Jon A. Lambert indited: Stein Somers wrote: In short, cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 bad. As Gerrit wrote from the start. Just as a point of strange coincidence, "cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 bad" seems to be the case with the recent Python and Postgres proble

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

Corinna Vinschen wrote: http://cygwin.com/problems.html I've already done gone and did that. I'm happy on existing configuration. I withdraw my casual observation. -- J Lambert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

On Aug 3 15:38, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > Stein Somers wrote: > > > >In short, cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 bad. As Gerrit wrote from the > >start. > > > > Just as a point of strange coincidence, "cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 > bad" seems to be the case with the recent Python and Postgres prob

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

Stein Somers wrote: In short, cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 bad. As Gerrit wrote from the start. Just as a point of strange coincidence, "cygwin 1.5.17-1 good, 1.5.18-1 bad" seems to be the case with the recent Python and Postgres problems reported as well. Also both appear on the surfac

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 8/3/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Stein Somers wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, I was too eager to try the upgrade to note the version it > > > was upgraded from. > > > > FYI, the information about all of your upgrades do

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

On 8/3/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Stein Somers wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I was too eager to try the upgrade to note the version it > > was upgraded from. > > FYI, the information about all of your upgrades done via Cygwin setup > (including the version you upgraded from)

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: FYI, the information about all of your upgrades done via Cygwin setup (including the version you upgraded from) can be obtained from /var/log/setup.log. I actually checked this file on my machine (and all others changed recently) and couldn't find anything relevant.

Re: bug report: abort in g++ 3.4.4 generated DLL & client (FAQ alert)

On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Stein Somers wrote: > Unfortunately, I was too eager to try the upgrade to note the version it > was upgraded from. FYI, the information about all of your upgrades done via Cygwin setup (including the version you upgraded from) can be obtained from /var/log/setup.log. I think

ChevronTexaco Email Firewall Alert

Your message with subject sent on 08/02/05, 03:39:11 contained one or more attachments not allowed by ChevronTexaco and was blocked. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.co

Re: [FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

On 6/22/05, Dave Korn wrote: > Original Message > >From: Brian Dessent > >Sent: 22 June 2005 16:36 > > > Patrick Rotsaert wrote: > > > >> I need to build a DLL in cygwin (I use a lot of POSIX functions), that I > >> can use in MSVC and Borland CBuilder apps. > > > > http://cygwin.com/faq/f

Re: [FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

Patrick Rotsaert wrote: > No problem that my dll will fall under the GPL. > Just out of curiosity, does this also apply for applications that use my > DLL? As far as I understand it, "linking" as defined by the GPL is when you incorporate code into the running process space. If you keep them sep

Re: [FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

Original Message From: Brian Dessent Sent: 22 June 2005 16:36 Patrick Rotsaert wrote: I need to build a DLL in cygwin (I use a lot of POSIX functions), that I can use in MSVC and Borland CBuilder apps. http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#TOC102 And, as far as I know, using cygwi

RE: [FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

Original Message >From: Corinna Vinschen >Sent: 22 June 2005 17:01 > On Jun 22 16:45, Dave Korn wrote: >> Note also that Cygwin is GPL'd software (as indeed are all other >> Cygwin-based libraries). That means that if your code links against the >> cygwin dll (and if your program is ca

Re: [FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

On Jun 22 16:45, Dave Korn wrote: > " Download crt0.c from the cygwin website and include it in your sources. > Modify it to call my_crt0() instead of cygwin_crt0(). " > > for point 5, and then something like > > " Note that if you are using any other Cygwin-based libraries that you will > pro

[FAQ Alert, ping JDF!] RE: How to make DLLs in cygwin for MSVC and BCB

Original Message >From: Brian Dessent >Sent: 22 June 2005 16:36 > Patrick Rotsaert wrote: > >> I need to build a DLL in cygwin (I use a lot of POSIX functions), that I >> can use in MSVC and Borland CBuilder apps. > > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#TOC102 > And, as far as I know, using

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, René Berber wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > Another thing to mention is the fact that programs other than firewalls > > might have that behavior (notably Norton Ghost and various antivirus > > programs). Two points, addressed separately. > Norton Ghost? That one is

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Another thing to mention is the fact that programs other than firewalls > might have that behavior (notably Norton Ghost and various antivirus > programs). Norton Ghost? That one is a hard disk duplication program, nothing to do with firewalls or antivirus. I've never

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 6/17/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>Why not just use the system firewall which is part of XP SP2? > > > Joshua, do you think you could add an entry about this concerning > > what seems to work and what doesn't seem to work? > > Done. htt

RE: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

Original Message >From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes >Sent: 21 June 2005 07:16 > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:06:47PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> On 6/17/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Why not just use the system firewall which is part of XP SP2? >> >>> Joshua, do you think you

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:06:47PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > Me too, but it is a popular product and maybe they've improved. > > I also thought I remembered one that never worked for anyone > > but a quick search didn't turn up t

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:06:47PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 6/17/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>Why not just use the system firewall which is part of XP SP2? > > > Joshua, do you think you could add an entry about this concerning > > what seems to work and what doesn't see

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On 6/17/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>Why not just use the system firewall which is part of XP SP2? > Joshua, do you think you could add an entry about this concerning > what seems to work and what doesn't seem to work? Done. http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC55 > Although, I thought I

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

At 05:07 PM 6/17/2005, you wrote: >On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:01:28PM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >>Corinna Vinschen wrote: I am wondering if there is a firewall that coexists with Cygwin well. IIRC, there were complaints about Norton software and about some other firewalls too. Wha

Re: Cygwin and firewalls (FAQ alert)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:01:28PM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>I am wondering if there is a firewall that coexists with Cygwin well. >>>IIRC, there were complaints about Norton software and about some other >>>firewalls too. What would you recommend me? >>> >>>I ask

Re: Updated: coreutils-5.3.0-6 [FAQ alert]

On 5/27/05, Eric Blake wrote: > Therefore, http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC45 is out of date, and we > need a FAQ update. It is now possible to do `mkdir -p > //MACHINE/Share/path/to/new/dir' and everything just works fine! However, > `mkdir -p machine\\share\\path' fails, because coreu

Re: Updated: coreutils-5.3.0-6 [FAQ alert]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 5/27/2005 6:38 AM: > A new release of coreutils, 5.3.0-6, is available. > > This release changes dd(1) to default to binary mode, and adds command > line options iflag=text and oflag=text to specify binary. It also fixes >

ChevronTexaco Email Firewall Alert

Your message with subject Re: Your software sent on 04/29/05, 17:36:10 contained one or more attachments not allowed by ChevronTexaco and was blocked. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: rxvt problem: Prompt doesn't look very nice [FAQ alert]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:33:54 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > Also, check out the generic build script, it automates several of the > steps in Chuck's email as listed in the FAQ (can we get FAQ 88 updated to > add a link to the latest version of the GBS?). It is covered in more > detail near the end of

Re: rxvt problem: Prompt doesn't look very nice [FAQ alert]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jonathan Arnold on 3/25/2005 7:16 AM: >> I would prefer the cygwin default for bash to be: >> >> PS1='\[\e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED] \[\e[33m\]\w\[\e[0m\]\n\$ ' > > > Well, I'm hoping I can find the time to propose a bash update this weekend >

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > Fixed. By the way, does anyone know exactly what Devel packages are required > to build Cygwin? I used to just think "install everything" but now > there's a lot of > new X or GNOME related stuff. I know I've got more than I need > installed, but I'm > thinking tha

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:36:50 -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:29:29 +0100, David Dindorp wrote: > > And the link in the FAQ is wrong: > > > > "How can I debug cygwin" (entry 105) says: > > > > "To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL, > > you will need to follow

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:29:29 +0100, David Dindorp wrote: > How about adding a line in the FAQ to the "how to build cygwin" (104) > entry > stating that the "configure ; make" mentioned does produce a Cygwin with > all > debugging symbols? > > And the link in the FAQ is wrong: > > "How can I debug

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

Ack! Apologies for the formatting. The company I'm employed at uses Outlook (thereby MS-WORD) for e-mail. Here's what I wanted to say: The FAQ entry 105 links to entry 102 under "how to compile". Shouldn't this point to 104 instead? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-s

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> Umm, that was my bad. The thing is, "--enable-debugging" really produces >> a developer debug version, with extra tracing, etc. If all you want is a >> version of DLL with all the symbols (i.e., unstripped), the regular build >> produces that as well. Cristopher Fayl

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:07:18PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, David Dindorp wrote: > >> Cristopher Faylor wrote: >> > Actually, we do. We provide the source code. It's easy to build. >> >> On your particular system which is tuned to do precisely this, maybe. >> If it's

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, David Dindorp wrote: > Cristopher Faylor wrote: > > Actually, we do. We provide the source code. It's easy to build. > > On your particular system which is tuned to do precisely this, maybe. > If it's as easy as you say, I'll spend some more time on it. > > > Have you even t

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

Cristopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, we do. We provide the source code. It's easy to build. On your particular system which is tuned to do precisely this, maybe. If it's as easy as you say, I'll spend some more time on it. > Have you even tried it? No. For a couple of reasons. 1. Prior exp

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:42:15PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >Yep, I missed that. It's gone, but with the other FAQ additions it moved: > > > >http://cygwin.com/faq/faq0.html#SEC104 On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:46:41 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > This feels vaguely like I'm programmi

Re: Multiple installations and 3PPs (FAQ alert)

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Steve Munson wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:32:08 -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > > I like the idea of it at least saving mounts. And the paths should work > > (note the "bin"). :) > > The only thing I would change is to save the state of the mounts within > the unin

Re: Multiple installations and 3PPs (FAQ alert)

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:32:08 -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > I like the idea of it at least saving mounts. And the paths should work > (note the "bin"). :) The only thing I would change is to save the state of the mounts within the uninstall script (just before uninstalling), rather than

Re: Multiple installations and 3PPs (FAQ alert)

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:51:38 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > > | Should we, perhaps, provide a small 'uninstall' script, maybe in > > | /usr/sbin, that would perform a umount and then use regtool to remove the > > | registry key?

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:42:15PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> >To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL, you will need to follow >> >the instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102, adding the

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL, you will need to follow > >the instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102, adding the > >`--enable-debugging' option to `../configure'. You can also contact the

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >To build a debugging version of the Cygwin DLL, you will need to follow >the instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102, adding the >`--enable-debugging' option to `../configure'. You can also contact the >mailing

Re: cygwin bughunt (FAQ alert?)

OK the three FAQs beginning at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq0.html#SEC102 now read: How do I build Cygwin on my own? First, you need to get the Cygwin source. Ideally, you should check out what you need from CVS (http://cygwin.com/cvs.html). This is the preferred method for acquiring the sources. Oth

Re: Multiple installations and 3PPs (FAQ alert)

> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:51:38 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > | Should we, perhaps, provide a small 'uninstall' script, maybe in > | /usr/sbin, that would perform a umount and then use regtool to remove the > | registry key? It could even be a .bat, which will enable it to delete all >

  1   2   3   >