}
`make` runs this as `psize.aux | sleep 3` which gives plenty of time to fill the
pipe before getting SIGPIPE when it outputs how much it has written.
To see what goes wrong, first build psize.exe:-
| gcc psize.c -g3 -gdwarf-5 -o psize
Now run psize with a longer sleep time so you can attach gdb to
On 2025-09-18 13:09, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
Please, can you handle this bug report, specific to Cygwin?
The GNU bash maintainer cannot reproduce it, as he doesn't use Cygwin.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2025-09/msg00186.html
Confirm it hangs in bash but not with dash/as
Please, can you handle this bug report, specific to Cygwin?
The GNU bash maintainer cannot reproduce it, as he doesn't use Cygwin.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2025-09/msg00186.html
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.c
On 2025-08-12 10:34, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
Is there any example for cygrunsrv to run a (cleanup) dash/bash script
when a Win32 service (set up via cygrunsrv) gets stopped ?
I am unaware of any possible Windows shutdown dependency options desktop users
can access, and any service
Hi!
-
Is there any example for cygrunsrv to run a (cleanup) dash/bash script
when a Win32 service (set up via cygrunsrv) gets stopped ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix prog
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 9:57 AM Sebastian Feld via Cygwin
wrote:
> Now that Microsoft is porting Cygwin to Aarch64:
>
> Do you know how to run Windows Aarch64 in qemu, so people can test
> Cygwin Aarch64 changes?
I use this script for Windows 11 experiments (same as
https://nrubsi
Greetings, Jeremy Drake!
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
>> Though, I'm using takecommand's free runtime (TCC-RT), which has an explicit
>> START /ELEVATED command, and I'm using a wrapper for such tasks.
> cygutils'
> cygstart -a runas /bin/bash ... ?
runas is not necessa
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
> Though, I'm using takecommand's free runtime (TCC-RT), which has an explicit
> START /ELEVATED command, and I'm using a wrapper for such tasks.
cygutils'
cygstart -a runas /bin/bash ... ?
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.
On 2025-04-11 14:11, Backwoods BC wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:32 AM Brian Inglis via Cygwin
wrote:
On 2025-04-11 10:21, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Greetings!
How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Windows
On 2025-04-11 10:46, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 6:32 PM Brian Inglis via Cygwin
wrote:
On 2025-04-11 10:21, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Greetings!
How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
Administrator mode when someone double-clicks
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:32 AM Brian Inglis via Cygwin
wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-11 10:21, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
> > Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Wind
Greetings, Mark Liam Brown!
> How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
> Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Windows Explorer?
Add a block that runs an admin only command and check for exit code.
The `net session` or `openfiles` commands are a good can
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 6:32 PM Brian Inglis via Cygwin
wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-11 10:21, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
> > Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Wind
On 2025-04-11 10:21, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Greetings!
How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Windows Explorer?
Use a Run as admin shortcut?
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta
Greetings!
How can I modify a Cygwin bash script so it runs in elevated
Administrator mode when someone double-clicks it in Windows Explorer?
Mark
--
IT Infrastructure Consultant
Windows, Linux
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com
On Mar 12 06:40, Peter Board via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Cygwin Developers,
>
> In the source code for the session.c Cygwin is using the standard
> OpenSSH source code, which checks for both the user ID of 0 and a
> permissions for who can write to the new folder.
> Chroot mounting test that I can't ge
Hi Cygwin Developers,
In the source code for the session.c Cygwin is using the standard OpenSSH
source code, which checks for both the user ID of 0 and a permissions for who
can write to the new folder.
Chroot mounting test that I can't get Cygwin to pass
if (st.st_uid != 0 || (st.st_mode & 022)
On 29/12/2024 at 00:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:07:10 +
Chris Elvidge wrote:
I have a directory of files that I need the contained executables run
from CRON. (Like run-parts.)
I have found that since 25/12/2024, when run from CRON, it doesn't
differentiate betw
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:07:10 +
Chris Elvidge wrote:
> I have a directory of files that I need the contained executables run
> from CRON. (Like run-parts.)
>
> I have found that since 25/12/2024, when run from CRON, it doesn't
> differentiate between executable and non-executable files. I.e.
I have a directory of files that I need the contained executables run
from CRON. (Like run-parts.)
I have found that since 25/12/2024, when run from CRON, it doesn't
differentiate between executable and non-executable files. I.e. tries to
run the non-executables. It ran correctly on 24/12/2024
I developed a bash script to get SMART stats from hard drives and it has
been working with success for years. It is working for both Linux and
Windows using Cygwin. Recently I ran into a new installation of this
script on a Server 2022 Standard host and found it failed. On closer
On 20/01/2024 21:26, James via Cygwin wrote:
Latest version of Cygwin installed and updated.
I'm trying to run this python script which uses chromium in order to execute.
I got it all installed, and I'm just now trying to run the script and login,
but it keeps saying it canno
Latest version of Cygwin installed and updated.
I'm trying to run this python script which uses chromium in order to execute.
I got it all installed, and I'm just now trying to run the script and login,
but it keeps saying it cannot find the chromedriver.exe.
But the file exists
On 2023-09-22 06:39, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:42 AM Christian Franke via Cygwin
wrote:
Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello,
Does Cygwin have a tool to run a bash script as SYSTEM user if my
account already have admin rights
Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:42 AM Christian Franke via Cygwin
wrote:
Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello,
Does Cygwin have a tool to run a bash script as SYSTEM user if my
account already have admin rights?
No (AFAIK).
I use psexec from Sysinternals tools
(https
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:42 AM Christian Franke via Cygwin
wrote:
>
> Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does Cygwin have a tool to run a bash script as SYSTEM user if my
> > account already have admin rights?
>
> No (AFAIK).
>
> I u
Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
Hello,
Does Cygwin have a tool to run a bash script as SYSTEM user if my
account already have admin rights?
No (AFAIK).
I use psexec from Sysinternals tools
(https://learn.microsoft.com/sysinternals/downloads/psexec)
This starts a Cygwin terminal as SYSTEM
Hello,
Does Cygwin have a tool to run a bash script as SYSTEM user if my
account already have admin rights?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info
On Aug 24 18:24, Martin Wege via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:15 AM ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
> >
> > Martin Wege via Cygwin writes:
> > > How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> > > Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> > > simple tes
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:52 AM Bill Stewart wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Andrew Schulman wrote:
>
> > How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
>> > Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
>> > simple test and bail out with an error if someone
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:15 AM ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
>
> Martin Wege via Cygwin writes:
> > How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> > Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> > simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Andrew Schulman wrote:
> How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> > Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> > simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
> > stuff (say: regtool) without admin
> Hello,
>
> How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
> stuff (say: regtool) without admin privileges.
https://superuser.com/questions/66019
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 2:15 AM ASSI wrote:
Windows really doesn't have a defined notion of what is or is not an
> "administrator". Each particular definition will be insufficient or
> invalid in certain contexts.
>
There is a definition of administrator in Windows: Your account is a
member, eit
Martin Wege via Cygwin writes:
> How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
> stuff (say: regtool) without admin privileges.
Windows really doe
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:02 PM Martin Wege via Cygwin
wrote:
> How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
> stuff (say: regtool) without admin
Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
Backwoods BC via Cygwin wrote:
[...]
I don't know if this is the official method, but it works for me:
# Shell Options
# Elevated privilege windows have $SESSIONNAME set
if [ "$SESSIONNAME" == "" ] ;then
printf -v adminPmt '[\u2022Admin\u2022] '
else
ex
Backwoods BC via Cygwin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:01 PM Martin Wege via Cygwin
wrote:
How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
stuff (s
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:01 PM Martin Wege via Cygwin
wrote:
> How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
> Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
> simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
> stuff (say: regtool) without admin
Hello,
How can I find out whether the current Cygwin terminal has
Administrator rights? I want to safeguard our admin scripts with a
simple test and bail out with an error if someone wants to do admin
stuff (say: regtool) without admin privileges.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Problem reports: https:/
On 2023-07-03 16:12, ravi r via Cygwin wrote:
Using
Cygwin Python interpreter invoked from shebang line
$ cat /tmp/script1
#!/usr/bin/python
print("hello");
$ /tmp/script1
hello
$
works as expected.
Conda Python interpreter invoked from shebang line
$ cat /tmp/sc
Using
Cygwin Python interpreter invoked from shebang line
$ cat /tmp/script1
#!/usr/bin/python
print("hello");
$ /tmp/script1
hello
$
works as expected.
Conda Python interpreter invoked from shebang line
$ cat /tmp/script2
#!/usr/local/anaconda3/python
print(
Greetings, Brian Inglis via Cygwin!
> On 2023-04-06 06:21, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
>>> I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
>>> #! /bin/sh
>>> or equivalently
>>> #! /bin/bash
>> By default, sh is bash in base Cygwin
On 2023-04-06 06:21, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
#! /bin/sh
or equivalently
#! /bin/bash
By default, sh is bash in base Cygwin installation.
Q3 - at 1/8 the size of bash and sh, I am not at all sure of the role and reac
rl, C,
text tools, etc - had to be tested and usage adjusted accordingly. It
wasn't uncommon to have a starter script that performed compatibility tests
and forked to the appropriate version... of the same code, functionally.
Back to the OP's problem.
I haven't seen the bash sou
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:43:51AM +, Fergus Daly via Cygwin wrote:
> I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
> #! /bin/sh
> or equivalently
> #! /bin/bash
> For various reasons I want this file to be identified as binary so its second
> line
> is
Greetings, Fergus Daly!
> I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
> #! /bin/sh
> or equivalently
> #! /bin/bash
By default, sh is bash in base Cygwin installation.
> Q3 - at 1/8 the size of bash and sh, I am not at all sure of the role and
> reac
Place the nul on the third line. For example:
#!/bin/bash
#
# ^@ identify as a binary file
...
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 4:03 AM Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <
cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6 04:43, Fergus Daly via Cygwin wrote:
> > I have a "hash bang" bash she
On Apr 6 04:43, Fergus Daly via Cygwin wrote:
> I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
> #! /bin/sh
> or equivalently
> #! /bin/bash
> For various reasons I want this file to be identified as binary so its second
> line
> is the single charact
I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line
#! /bin/sh
or equivalently
#! /bin/bash
For various reasons I want this file to be identified as binary so its second
line
is the single character null \x00 showing up in some editors e.g. nano as
^@
This does not prevent the s
On 02/02/2023 22:42, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
Hi folks,
Using previously posted reinstall incomplete packages script as a number
of my packages are now flagged Incomplete.
The script now seems to do nothing to any package as setup comes up with
a blank list of packages.
Also tried a
Hi folks,
Using previously posted reinstall incomplete packages script as a number of my
packages are now flagged Incomplete.
The script now seems to do nothing to any package as setup comes up with a blank
list of packages.
Also tried a number of variations including shell script invocations
, see perl -V
for more detail)
Copyright 1987-2021, Larry Wall
[snip]
That is Cygwin's perl, but...
$ which perl
/usr/local/bin/perl
That is not the same.
The first one is at /usr/bin/perl. And your PATH correctly leads to it.
Your problem is the script, which explicitly calls the 2nd
nternal Server Error running perl script in
browser
WARNING: This email originated outside of the Salina Regional Health Center
email system.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
On 11/17/2022 10:22 AM, Michael Lascuola via Cygwin wrote:
&g
On 11/17/2022 10:22 AM, Michael Lascuola via Cygwin wrote:
Good day!
I have an issue where I receive "Internal Server Error" when running perl
scripts in the browser. Here's an example script that works OK when running from the
Cygwin Terminal:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
Tha
Good day!
I have an issue where I receive "Internal Server Error" when running perl
scripts in the browser. Here's an example script that works OK when running
from the Cygwin Terminal:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use DBI;
my @ary = DBI->available_drivers();
print @ary;
print
On 2022-07-19, Kutty, Rejeesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently ran the installer and it updated vim to 8.2
>
> :version
> VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Feb 13 2022 22:00:24)
> Included patches: 1-4372
>
>
> Now when I open a perl script, I get the f
Hi,
I recently ran the installer and it updated vim to 8.2
:version
VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Feb 13 2022 22:00:24)
Included patches: 1-4372
Now when I open a perl script, I get the following message:
Command terminated
Error detected while processing BufRead Autocommands
On 2021-09-15 15:11, Bryan VanSchouwen via Cygwin wrote:
I just tried executing an old, previously-functional awk script using a
version of gawk that I had downloaded last year, and a command of the
following format (as recommended in a previous communication with the
Cygwin mailing list):
gawk
On 9/15/21, Bryan VanSchouwen via Cygwin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just tried executing an old, previously-functional awk script using a
> version of gawk that I had downloaded last year, and a command of the
> following format (as recommended in a previous communication with the
> C
Hello.
I just tried executing an old, previously-functional awk script using a
version of gawk that I had downloaded last year, and a command of the
following format (as recommended in a previous communication with the
Cygwin mailing list):
gawk -vRS="\r\n" -f data_collect_e_-_FF_4-sta
On 9/15/2021 5:11 PM, Bryan VanSchouwen via Cygwin wrote:
Hello.
I just tried executing an old, previously-functional awk script using a
version of gawk that I had downloaded last year, and a command of the
following format (as recommended in a previous communication with the
Cygwin mailing
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:11 PM Bryan VanSchouwen wrote:
WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON WITH THIS SOFTWARE?!
>
I don't know what the technical problem is, but I would politely point out:
1. Typing things in all caps is considered shouting
2. Shouting at the people who might be able to help you is p
Hello.
I just tried executing an old, previously-functional awk script using a
version of gawk that I had downloaded last year, and a command of the
following format (as recommended in a previous communication with the
Cygwin mailing list):
gawk -vRS="\r\n" -f data_collect_e_-_FF_4-sta
Allen Hewes via Cygwin writes:
> I think the recent man* package update has an issue in the postinstall script:
Yes, the script got broken when it was generated for packaging. It's
hopefully fixed now.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda
Hi,
I think the recent man* package update has an issue in the postinstall script:
Postinstall script errors
Package: z/Perpetual
zp_man-db-update-index.dash exit code 2
$ /etc/postinstall/zp_man-db-update-index.dash
/etc/postinstall/zp_man-db-update-index.dash: line 4: syntax error near
On 2020-12-15 13:51, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 15.12.2020 21:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2020-12-15 01:43, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
Not a recent bug but annoying anyway
It seems the post-install script is not considering that the
installation can be in a disk different from C
On 15.12.2020 21:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2020-12-15 01:43, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
Not a recent bug but annoying anyway
It seems the post-install script is not considering that the
installation can be in a disk different from C: , properly
in this case D:
The post-install script
On 2020-12-15 01:43, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
Not a recent bug but annoying anyway
It seems the post-install script is not considering that the
installation can be in a disk different from C: , properly
in this case D:
The post-install script does not care as mkshortcut uses POSIX paths
Not a recent bug but annoying anyway
It seems the post-install script is not considering that the
installation can be in a disk different from C: , properly
in this case D:
2020/12/15 08:40:13 running: d:\cygwin32\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
"/etc/postinstall/cygwin-doc.sh"
Please ignore this. There was an error in my test case.
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Simple Bash script:
> #!/bin/bash
>
> cut
Save as "testme.sh" in C:\ or elsewhere.
Open a Windows command prompt and type:
> cmd /c bash -c /c/testme.sh
I get the following error:
> -gThe system cannot find the file specified.
This only seems to trigger when b
B db.h version >= 4.1 ... no (version numbers not
> found)
> configure: error: Berkeley DB db.h is missing or has incompatible version
No, that does not mean that the configure script failed. It means the
configure script determined that your build machine lacks some
capabilities this p
ttp%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 lkclooney lkclooney 1225235
> Nov 3 11:54 setup-x86_64.exe
> The video instructs the user to execute the cygwin install configure script
> in gnu-cobol-1.1 directory.
> lkclooney@CLO
lkclooney lkclooney 1225235
Nov 3 11:54 setup-x86_64.exe
The video instructs the user to execute the cygwin install configure script in
gnu-cobol-1.1 directory.
lkclooney@CLOONEY-1 /cygdrive/c/OC/gnu-cobol-1.1
$ ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
extension .sh hoping to have that
work as a shell script. I then input in the terminal the uncensored
"./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH" and got the uncensored version of
"-bash: ./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH: No such file or directory". Oh!
And it likely is the right path a
L_PATH". I then copy-pasted it (from Cygwin64
>> Terminal) into a file I saved with the extension .sh hoping to have that
>> work as a shell script. I then input in the terminal the uncensored
>> "./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH" and got the uncensored version o
L_PATH". I then copy-pasted it (from Cygwin64
>> Terminal) into a file I saved with the extension .sh hoping to have that
>> work as a shell script. I then input in the terminal the uncensored
>> "./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH" and got the uncensored version o
ed to do a command that give the result I wanted (I've tested it
successfully) ; its censored version is "sed -e 'WORKING_REGEX' -i
/cygdrive/REGEX_FILE_FULL_PATH". I then copy-pasted it (from Cygwin64
Terminal) into a file I saved with the extension .sh hoping to have
ith the extension .sh hoping to have that
> work as a shell script. I then input in the terminal the uncensored
> "./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH" and got the uncensored version of
> "-bash: ./cygdrive/SHELL_SCRIPT_FULL_PATH: No such file or directory". Oh!
> And it l
nted (I've tested it
successfully) ; its censored version is "sed -e 'WORKING_REGEX' -i
/cygdrive/REGEX_FILE_FULL_PATH". I then copy-pasted it (from Cygwin64
Terminal) into a file I saved with the extension .sh hoping to have that
work as a shell script. I then input in the
I frequently cannot contribute discussion to Cygwin topics, but due to
my work porting a database (fis-gtm) to Cygwin, I can chime in here.
This is a good article to give you an overview of the different
calling conventions out there:
https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2011/09/06/stack-frame-layout-on-
On 4/26/2019 5:04 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
Ultimately what I am trying to research is how to begin building a simple
compilation system of my own, so how do the *makers* of compilers deal with
these differences in calling convention?
They make parts of the compilers conditional on the overall
Just two thoughts:
1. You probably know that 'cc -S foo.c' produces foo.s which is the
assembler output. Might be worthwhile examining how the experts who
wrote the C compiler handle all this. The output is usually quite
readable for someone prone to reading such things.
2. Rather than generati
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:04, Jesse Thompson <> wrote:
>
> > From: Eliot Moss <>
> > To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:16:38 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Request for an example x68 assembler portable Hello World
> Ultimately what I am trying to research is how to begin building a simp
> From: Eliot Moss
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:16:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: Request for an example x68 assembler portable Hello World
script
>
> Der Jesse -- Someone else may be able to speak to the specifics, but
> register use and calling convention
On 4/26/2019 3:25 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
I would like to learn how to write assembly programs for the command line
that with as little alteration as is feasable will compile both in Cygwin
and in other flavors of Unix like Linux and/or FreeBSD.
I am targeting only x64 CPUs and I'm perfectly h
I would like to learn how to write assembly programs for the command line
that with as little alteration as is feasable will compile both in Cygwin
and in other flavors of Unix like Linux and/or FreeBSD.
I am targeting only x64 CPUs and I'm perfectly happy to use libc calls
instead of direct sysca
Am 25.04.2019 um 18:11 schrieb Peter Palaparthy:
> Cygwin bash script is removing equals sign from command call.
On what basis did you conclude it was bash doing that, and not, say, make?
> *Here is the relevant command in my makefile.*
> *$(elabcmd) = $(XELAB_DEFAULT) \-generic VERSI
On 4/25/2019 12:11 PM, Peter Palaparthy wrote:
Cygwin bash script is removing equals sign from command call. How do I
escape it so that = is sent to command?
I tried different things like escaping = with \ and enclosing it with ""
and '' but none of them worked.
*Here is
Cygwin bash script is removing equals sign from command call. How do I
escape it so that = is sent to command?
I tried different things like escaping = with \ and enclosing it with ""
and '' but none of them worked.
*Here is the relevant command in my makefile.*
*$(elabcm
On 2019-03-03 14:48, Vince Rice wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Mason Giles wrote:
>> The /usr/bin/script program seems to have gone missing from the util-linux
>> package somewhere between the 2.25 and 2.32 timeframe.
>> As far as I can tell this program is still in
> On Mar 3, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Mason Giles wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The /usr/bin/script program seems to have gone missing from the util-linux
> package somewhere between the 2.25 and 2.32 timeframe.
>
> As far as I can tell this program is still included upstream (and the
&g
Hi,
The /usr/bin/script program seems to have gone missing from the util-linux
package somewhere between the 2.25 and 2.32 timeframe.
As far as I can tell this program is still included upstream (and the
util-linux package still contains its /usr/bin/scriptreplay counterpart).
Any ideas what
Jon Turney wrote:
On 01/10/2018 10:20, Mark Geisert wrote:
For those Cygwin developers who tend to attract stackdump files...
..mark (who defines an alias 'bt' to launch the script because he can't get
gdb out of his head)
Nice. Thanks.
OTHERS=`ldd $IMG1 | awk '{print
On 01/10/2018 10:20, Mark Geisert wrote:
For those Cygwin developers who tend to attract stackdump files...
..mark (who defines an alias 'bt' to launch the script because he can't
get gdb out of his head)
Nice. Thanks.
OTHERS=`ldd $IMG1 | awk '{print $3}' | sort
For those Cygwin developers who tend to attract stackdump files...
..mark (who defines an alias 'bt' to launch the script because he can't get gdb
out of his head)
h/t to JT
#!/bin/bash
#
# stackdump2backtrace (incremented)
# Munges a Cygwin stackdump file into a
On Apr 23 11:20, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2018-04-23 02:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Apr 23 08:43, David Macek wrote:
> >> On 21. 4. 2018 17:38, Brian Inglis wrote:
> >>> See my other post in this thread where strace shows @ handling is not
> >>> i
On 2018-04-23 02:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 23 08:43, David Macek wrote:
>> On 21. 4. 2018 17:38, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> See my other post in this thread where strace shows @ handling is not
>>> involved,
>>> as the script directory and name are
On Apr 23 08:43, David Macek wrote:
> On 21. 4. 2018 17:38, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > See my other post in this thread where strace shows @ handling is not
> > involved,
> > as the script directory and name are normalized and converted to a win32
> > path
> >
1 - 100 of 1788 matches
Mail list logo
