Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:50:18PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
J. Johnston wrote:
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down
J. Johnston wrote:
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?
Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it&#x
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?
Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse than a factor of 20.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:25:07PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Cygwin has a struct __stat64. We could also define a struct stat64
but this would be contrary to the effort to handle the new structures
transparent. struct __stat64 is struct stat
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:01:44PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
For clarification, I am not referring to a function, I am referring to the
struct stat64
which is needed as an argument to _fstat64_r or _stat64 for that matter.
There is no struct
stat64 or struct _stat64
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
A monster patch has been checked in. I found a problem in
stdio64/fseeko64.c
using struct stat when calling _fstat64_r. I could not switch to use stat64
as Cygwin has not defined it externally. For now
_GLOBAL_REENT instead of _REENT
until there is a better solution.
Thomas
J. Johnston wrote:
It's a design problem that isn't the fault of __DYNAMIC_REENT__ and
is going to require a little bit of thought. One way you might bypass
this problem is
to create an fopen stub for your application a
David,
Could you provide more details on the failure. Does the latest version of the
testcases test long
double by any chance? The newlib version matches the C99 sample definition except
that it is
missing long double support.
-- Jeff J.
Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I have been working
Chris,
Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
new one.
-- Jeff J.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:22PM +1100, Robert Co
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:34:37AM +1000, Arseny Slobodjuck wrote:
Sunday, November 24, 2002, 9:04:04 AM, you wrote:
j> I use a pretty new Cygwin release and I notice that the strtof function is
j> missing in stdlib.h. On my Linux system the function is declared in stdl
10 matches
Mail list logo
