Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Didn't see tihs in the FAQ: how do I install just one package? My
> only options at the global level are "Default", "Install",
> "Reinstall", and "Uninstall". I want "Skip" for everything except the
> one package I've selected. I don't want to upgrade anything I've
> alrea
Didn't see tihs in the FAQ: how do I install just one package? My
only options at the global level are "Default", "Install",
"Reinstall", and "Uninstall". I want "Skip" for everything except the
one package I've selected. I don't want to upgrade anything I've
already installed, or install anyth
procmon.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:18:45AM +0100, Julio Costa wrote:
>You know, you shouldn't take everything that is asked in this list as
>a criticism.
I didn't take it as criticism but, you're right, my reply was overly
harsh. I apologize for the tone.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
Eric Blake wrote:
> Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
>
>>> I'm wondering if the problem is not how I compiled bash, but how I compiled
>>> readline. Dave, any pointers I should try or maybe a missed compiler flag
> I
>>> should have used to build libreadline7 with gcc4? I'm shooting in the
Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
> > I'm wondering if the problem is not how I compiled bash, but how I compiled
> > readline. Dave, any pointers I should try or maybe a missed compiler flag
I
> > should have used to build libreadline7 with gcc4? I'm shooting in the
dark,
> > since I can'
Eric Blake wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if the problem is not how I compiled bash, but how I compiled
> readline. Dave, any pointers I should try or maybe a missed compiler flag I
> should have used to build libreadline7 with gcc4? I'm shooting in the dark,
> since I can't seem to reproduce the c
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:44:23PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I have some testing code which only tries to create an invisible console
>if the application to execv is not a Cygwin application. It seems to
>work nicely. I'm just not sure if it's really *that* simple...
I actually had some pl
Vincent R. smartmobili.com> writes:
> is it the first time you compile readline with gcc-4 ?
Yes, plus readline 6.0 is a new upstream release.
--
Eric Blake
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://
Corinna,
Sorry for the delay -- I'm waiting for the sysadmins to tell me what the
filesystem of the U drive is...
In the meantime, I attach the output of strace on 1.7 (I don't know why
I sent you the output of 1.5.25).
I hope I'll soon have more information on the filesystem...
Steve
lsu.t
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:03:35 + (UTC), Eric Blake wrote:
> Edward Lam sidefx.com> writes:
>
>> > 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll.
>> > It
>> > would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may
>> > require
>> > rebuilding a bash image with
Edward Lam sidefx.com> writes:
> > 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll. It
> > would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may require
> > rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do any
> > rebasing? Maybe this is a c
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 3 10:18, Julio Costa wrote:
>> Let me rephrase that in three questions:
>> "What happens if we launch commands without a console created?"
>
> That's actually the same question as the next one, isn't it?
>
It is now, that I seen the a
Eric Blake wrote:
61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll. It
would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may require
rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do any
rebasing? Maybe this is a case where I didn't use the co
On 7/2/2009 11:54 PM, Haojun Bao wrote:
When I start emacs (alternated to emacs-X11) with `run emacs' on the
Windows console (started with the Cygwin.bat shortcut), the emacs
performance is not good (moving the cursor up/down is not smooth), and
not stable (hang/crash sometimes).
I can't reprod
2009/7/3 Corinna Vinschen:
> I have some testing code which only tries to create an invisible console
> if the application to execv is not a Cygwin application. It seems to
> work nicely. I'm just not sure if it's really *that* simple...
Me neither.
Given that Cygwin applications themselves ar
On Jul 3 10:18, Julio Costa wrote:
> Let me rephrase that in three questions:
> "What happens if we launch commands without a console created?"
That's actually the same question as the next one, isn't it?
> "What are the type of programs that really need that console?"
Cygwin processes don't wo
On Jul 3 10:11, Vincent R. wrote:
> >> Ok, so I can confirm a problem with bash 3.2.49-23 on Windows 7 RC build
> >> 7100 64-bit. Basically, bash just crashes on startup. I don't have
> >> access to a Vista machine right now but it's worthwhile confirming on
> it.
> >
> > I don't have access to a
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 18:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:41:18PM +0100, Julio Costa wrote:
>>HKCU\Console\\WindowPosition = 0x80008000, where
>>is the name of current command being launched
>>
>>Yes, I know, more klumsy workaround... I'm not happy with that also,
>>but
>> Ok, so I can confirm a problem with bash 3.2.49-23 on Windows 7 RC build
>> 7100 64-bit. Basically, bash just crashes on startup. I don't have
>> access to a Vista machine right now but it's worthwhile confirming on
it.
>
> I don't have access to any of these (just XP, here), so I can't really
20 matches
Mail list logo
