On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:03:35 +0000 (UTC), Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> wrote: > Edward Lam <edward <at> sidefx.com> writes: > >> > 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll.
>> > It >> > would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may >> > require >> > rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do >> > any >> > rebasing? Maybe this is a case where I didn't use the correct gcc-4 >> > flags >> > for compilation, at which point an updated binutils/gcc might fix >> > things. is it the first time you compile readline with gcc-4 ? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
