Re: How to close a SSH connection from a BAT file

2007-08-20 Thread Sylvain Richard
Anthony de Sousa wrote: the next time that net start ssh is issued the following errors are in the log bind: Address already in use channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 139 Could not request local forwarding Re your port 139 problem, see: http://www.blisstonia.com/eolson/notes/sm

Re: How to close a SSH connection from a BAT file

2007-08-20 Thread Anthony de Sousa
Anthony de Sousa csc.com> writes: > > > I would like to conclude that we have decided to use AUTOSSH to control ssh. With autossh the processes are stoped automatically whenever autossh is stoped. As Brian originally suggested all that is then required on either side of the bat file is a Ne

Re: cygwin compliation crash when uninstalling the old version of bash

2007-08-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please keep replies on the list - http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE According to wei on 8/20/2007 12:16 PM: > Hi Eric > >> And what did the popup say? Nothing in your cygcheck output is jumping >> out at me as unusual, but without knowing what the

Re: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread g6522c
-Original Message- >From: Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 20, 2007 7:40 AM >To: cygwin@cygwin.com >I wouldn't spend too much effort on that. It's fixed in 4.x, and the >3.x branches were closed a long time ago. OTOH, it might be nice to >have this fixed in the Cygwin-distrib

Re: rsync problems from Vista installed cygwin, ok on XP

2007-08-20 Thread DaveB
Igor Peshansky wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, DaveB wrote: > >> Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote: >> > >> > On Aug 18 21:06, DaveB wrote: >> >> So... two interesting followon points... >> >> >> >> 1. Why didn't the ACLs get set to something reasonable as opposed to >> >> 000 in the first place when I

Re: Cygwin: Problem detecting subprocess termination after _spawn_posix in distutils?

2007-08-20 Thread Steve Holden
Steve Holden wrote: Martin v. Löwis wrote: The only environment variables that don't appear in the shell output from the env command are INFOPATH, MAKE_MODE and PLAT. I am still flummoxed. At this point, I'd recommend to perform a cygwin update; with Cygwin, these problems often go away with an

symbolic link untar issue

2007-08-20 Thread Tom Rodman
These steps 'hide bash', so invoking bash again fails: /tmp $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.0 argon 1.5.24(0.156/4/2) 2007-01-31 10:57 i686 Cygwin /tmp $ tar tvf bar.tar drwxrwxr-x staffuser1/XYZ_ES_STAFF 0 2007-08-20 17:29 ZZ/ lrwxrwxrwx staffuser1/XYZ_ES_STAFF 0 2007-08-20 17:29 ZZ/bash2 -> /bi

Re: Latest mutt (1.4.2.2-1) does not work on (my) XP

2007-08-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:35:37PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> What does "tried different temp dirs" mean? How did you try them? By >> setting an environment variable. > >editing ~/.muttrc's tmpdir property > >> Please prov

Re: Latest mutt (1.4.2.2-1) does not work on (my) XP

2007-08-20 Thread Pedro Alves
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > What does "tried different temp dirs" mean? How did you try them? By > setting an environment variable. editing ~/.muttrc's tmpdir property > > Please provide a *specific* operation that does not work. The simplest one,

Re: Latest mutt (1.4.2.2-1) does not work on (my) XP

2007-08-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:57:52PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >I can't run latest mutt, version mutt-1.4.2.2-1 on my XP. For every >operation I try to do I get an error like 'cannot create temporary file'. >It's not a permission problem... files are created (even tried different >temp dirs) with 0 s

Latest mutt (1.4.2.2-1) does not work on (my) XP

2007-08-20 Thread Pedro Alves
Hello. I can't run latest mutt, version mutt-1.4.2.2-1 on my XP. For every operation I try to do I get an error like 'cannot create temporary file'. It's not a permission problem... files are created (even tried different temp dirs) with 0 size. Reverting to version 1.4.2.1i-1 everything work

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ? Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!! It was a permissions problem afterall. Very sorry for poluting your mailing list. Regards, Aaron -- Unsubscribe

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
Okay getfacl is reporting 'user::---' rather than 'user::rwx' for depcomp on my patched version of GCC. This leads to two questions ... How do I modify this to be correct ? Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ? Thanks for bearing with me. Aaron -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
Ignore the previous post depcomp is under src/gcc-4.2.0 not build/gcc-4.2.0 ! Sorry to mess you about. I'll get some ACL results now ... Aaron -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http:

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
Okay I printed out '$am_depcomp' which was effectivly 'gcc4.2.0/libcpp/../depcomp' and put an 'exit' at (effective) line 2888 and the file gcc4.2.0/depcomp does not seem to exist. Very strange as I found 'depcomp' before previously and its printing 'line: 2888: ./depcomp: permisssion denied' r

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
Aaron Gray wrote: A Windows text editor called Zeus. That's it. I bet the problem disappears if you use a Cygwin text editor such as vim. When a native Windows app creates a file, it usually does not do anything special with the ACL, so it gets whatever the default inheritable permissions of

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Aaron Gray wrote: > A Windows text editor called Zeus. That's it. I bet the problem disappears if you use a Cygwin text editor such as vim. When a native Windows app creates a file, it usually does not do anything special with the ACL, so it gets whatever the default inheritable permissions of

RE: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 19:13, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> Hopefully I shall get to the bottom of it if I perservere, but any help or >>> suggestions are welcome. >> >> Well, why don't you actually *look* at those perms, instead of asking people >> who have no

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote: Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when modified cracks appear, only on Vista though, XP is okay. So must be something to do with permissions. So, what tool did you use to 'modify' it? A Windows text editor called Zeus. I have been altering

RE: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 18:16, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> Unmodified GCC 4.2.0 compiles okay, but when modified cracks appear, only >>> on Vista though, XP is okay. So must be something to do with permissions. >> >> So, what tool did you use to 'modify' it? > > A Windows text editor called Zeus. > > I ha

Re: Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
On 20 August 2007 17:42, Aaron Gray wrote: On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote: BTW, you didn't by any chance use winzip to unpack the tarball did you? No. Just checking. Windoze tools don't generally do the right thing for cygwin's emulation of posix perms. Apart from that, the file p

RE: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 17:42, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote: >>> BTW, you didn't by any chance use winzip to unpack the tarball did you? > > No. Just checking. Windoze tools don't generally do the right thing for cygwin's emulation of posix perms. >> Apart from that, th

Re: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote: On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote: > AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem. > [...] Hm, that sounds like a file that you have write but not delete permissions to. > Can someone look into this plea

Re: permissions/owners seen on cygwin-client vs. server

2007-08-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:11:56PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote: >On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Linda Walsh wrote: >>As for including cygcheck, I don't have a problem doing that when >>necessary, but I prefer to check that it's not some "braino", or that >>it is a "real" problem before attaching a full cygdu

Re: rsync problems from Vista installed cygwin, ok on XP

2007-08-20 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, DaveB wrote: > Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote: > > > > On Aug 18 21:06, DaveB wrote: > >> So... two interesting followon points... > >> > >> 1. Why didn't the ACLs get set to something reasonable as opposed to > >> 000 in the first place when I created this little test area in Vista

Re: permissions/owners seen on cygwin-client vs. server

2007-08-20 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Linda Walsh wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Larry is right, of course, but I make a wild guess, nevertheless: > > CYGWIN=nosmbntsec --- Assuming you mean having that string in the CYGWIN env var, unfortunately, this is not the case. See

Re: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 20 16:20, Dave Korn wrote: > On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote: > >>> On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote: > > AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem. > > [...] > Hm, that sounds like a file that you have write but not delete permissions > to. > > > Can someone look

RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 12:40, Brian Dessent wrote: > g6522c wrote: > >> If I can locate the relevant routines in gcc I might be able to provide a >> patch. My > > I wouldn't spend too much effort on that. It's fixed in 4.x, and the > 3.x branches were closed a long time ago. OTOH, it might be nic

RE: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 15:49, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Now I having a problem with libcpp getting the error :- >> >>checking dependancy style of gcc... >> /usr/src/gcc-4.2.0/libcpp/configure: line 2887: ./depcomp: premission >> denied. > > AFACT this act

RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On , Dave Korn wrote: [ Please try to snip rawquotes of email addresses from replies (or even better, configure your mailer to snip em out), posting someone's address to the list causes them to receive more spam. (http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR) ] > This preprocessed input

Re: REAL Problem building GCC on Cygwin on Vista

2007-08-20 Thread Aaron Gray
On 19 August 2007 20:22, Aaron Gray wrote: Now I having a problem with libcpp getting the error :- checking dependancy style of gcc... /usr/src/gcc-4.2.0/libcpp/configure: line 2887: ./depcomp: premission denied. AFACT this actually looks like a Vista problem. I replaced line 2875 with :

Re: python module patch

2007-08-20 Thread Jason Tishler
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) schrieb: > >Reini Urban wrote: > >>extern __declspec(dllexport) cannot be used as constant during > >>compile-time. > >>=> "initializer element is not constant" > >>cygwin auto-import feature get's that right at li

Default group shown by mkpasswd

2007-08-20 Thread Saro Engels
Currently I have installed cygwin on two xp professional machines which behave slightly different. The problem is basically how to change my default group which is currently set in one machine to 513(None) and 547(Power Users) on the newer machine; as far as I found out yesterday, cygwin seems t

Re: cygwin compliation crash when uninstalling the old version of bash

2007-08-20 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to wei on 8/19/2007 3:09 PM: > Hi Eric > > It's a popup box from setup.exe. I also attached the cygcheck.out in the > email And what did the popup say? Nothing in your cygcheck output is jumping out at me as unusual, but without knowing wh

Re: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I can locate the relevant routines in gcc I might be able to provide a > patch. My I wouldn't spend too much effort on that. It's fixed in 4.x, and the 3.x branches were closed a long time ago. OTOH, it might be nice to have this fixed in the Cygwin-distributed

RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread g6522c
-Original Message- >From: Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 20, 2007 6:25 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com >Subject: RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb? > >On 20 August 2007 10:54, g6522c wrote: > >[ List Cc'd back in. http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE, thanks! ] >

RE: Copy/Paste doesn't run on Cygwin

2007-08-20 Thread Jose Luis
Here there is another link about this issue: http://www.nabble.com/Serious-flaw-in-Cygwin-X-clipboard-integration-prevents-paste-from-X-to-Windows-apps-tf946678.html#a2458589 It seems that it is a Cygwin X bug. Does anybody know if there is a fix to this problem? Regards, Jose Luis. J

RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 10:54, g6522c wrote: [ List Cc'd back in. http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPIOSPE, thanks! ] >>> This preprocessed input causes GCC (3.4.4) to segfault >>> >>> # 1 "test.c" 1 >>> >>> int main () { >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> ... and this doesn't: >>> >>> # 1 "

RE: Copy/Paste doesn't run on Cygwin

2007-08-20 Thread Jose Luis
Thanks for your help. I have tried it, but the problem persist. I have found som information about this issue on a "Vim Forum": http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-problems-with-X11-GUI---XTERM-clipboard-integration-with-native-Win-applications---was-%22clipboard-support-with-GTK-GUI-under-cygwin

Re: Fw: clear

2007-08-20 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > However, neither of these packages in available in Setup.exe. Only > libncurses libraries are available, and they are already installed on my > computer. They are available in setup. Set the view to Full for a flat list. If they're still not listed, then there must be

RE: Copy/Paste doesn't run on Cygwin

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 10:26, Jose Luis wrote: > Hi, > > Without the ".vimrc" file the copy/paste runs fine in a vim's edited file, > but when I copy the example vimrc file > (/usr/share/vim/vim71/vimrc_example.vim) in $HOME/.vimrc, the selected text > isn't copy automatically on the clipboard. Whe

Re: Fw: clear

2007-08-20 Thread PDeRochambeau
Hello, when you search for "ncurses" in the Cygwin Package List of the cygwin.com website, two ncurses packages appear: - ncurses-5.5-2 - ncurses-5.5-3 However, neither of these packages in available in Setup.exe. Only libncurses libraries are available, and they are already installed on my c

RE: Permission denied problem

2007-08-20 Thread Marko Loparic
On 17 August 2007 17:35, Dave Korn > For comparison, what does the standard windows 'cacls.exe' utility tell you > about that directory, and about one where the problem doesn't happen? cacls will certainly be of great help, thanks a lot. Here is what I get for the directory without problems: $

Re: Fw: clear

2007-08-20 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In Cygwin Package List, it says that clear was removed and that ncurses > should be used instead (?). However, libncurses7 and libncurses8 ARE > installed on my machine, according to setup.exe, which means, I guess, > that ncurses is installed. No, it means that libncur

RE: clear

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 August 2007 10:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I have just reinstalled cygwin from scratch (deleted c:\cygwin directory) > and noticed that the clear command was not in /usr/bin anymore. > > In Cygwin Package List, it says that clear was removed and that ncurses > should be used

Re: rsync problems from Vista installed cygwin, ok on XP

2007-08-20 Thread DaveB
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote: > > On Aug 18 21:06, DaveB wrote: >> So... two interesting followon points... >> >> 1. Why didn't the ACLs get set to something reasonable as opposed to 000 >> in >> the first place when I created this little test area in Vista? After >> all, I > > The directory has

Fw: clear

2007-08-20 Thread PDeRochambeau
Hello, I have just reinstalled cygwin from scratch (deleted c:\cygwin directory) and noticed that the clear command was not in /usr/bin anymore. In Cygwin Package List, it says that clear was removed and that ncurses should be used instead (?). However, libncurses7 and libncurses8 ARE installe

Copy/Paste doesn't run on Cygwin

2007-08-20 Thread Jose Luis
Hi, Without the ".vimrc" file the copy/paste runs fine in a vim's edited file, but when I copy the example vimrc file (/usr/share/vim/vim71/vimrc_example.vim) in $HOME/.vimrc, the selected text isn't copy automatically on the clipboard. The ".vimrc" is attached. http://www.nabble.com/file/p122

RE: Problem with Text mounts after updating using setup.exe

2007-08-20 Thread Bart van der Werf
Could someone confirm this is introduced in grep-2.5.1a-4, grep-2.5.1a-2 seems to be good? Greets, Bart > -Original Message- > From: Bart van der Werf > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:44 AM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Problem with Text mounts after updating using setup.exe

RE: Line info causes GCC to bomb?

2007-08-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 19 August 2007 21:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I haven't seen this problem anywhere in the list archive, so > here it is. > > This preprocessed input causes GCC (3.4.4) to segfault > > # 1 "test.c" 1 > > int main () { > return 0; > } > > ... and this doesn't: > > # 1 "te

Re: RXVT doesn't recognize ALT + Cursor keys

2007-08-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 19 13:55, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > I understand, however even as a vi user you use the "j" and "k" keys for > up and down movement, the "h" and "l" keys for left and right movement > and the "w" for word forward forward, "b" for word back no? I've always > heard that the reason for that is

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Unicode text editor mined 2000 release 14

2007-08-20 Thread Thomas Wolff
mined 2000 release 14 (July 2007) Mined is a powerful text editor with a comprehensive yet concise and easy-to-use user interface supporting modern interaction paradigms, and fast, small-footprint behaviour. Mined provides both extensive Un