Re: listen/accept/fork behavior problem between cygwin1 1.5.18 and cygwin1.dll 1.5.19

> From: Corinna Vinschen > To: cygwin at cygwin dot com > Subject: Re: listen/accept/fork behavior problem between cygwin1 1.5.18 and > cygwin1.dll 1.5.19 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com > > On Mar 9 17:54, BRC wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a perl based s

RE: gcc-3.4.4-2 progress report

On 18 May 2006 22:27, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00979.html Oh, good catch on those cobol libraries BTW, I *didn't* notice that one yet. Before I do a release, I'll diff the listings of all the tarballs against the 3.4.4-1 tarballs as released and mak

RE: gcc-3.4.4-2 progress report

On 18 May 2006 22:27, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > Dave Korn wrote : > >> I don't know what went wrong with D yet. > > > I do not know if this is the same I posted in April: > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00979.html :) Thanks, but I found that one and fixed the script to create

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

On 19 May 2006 00:31, Nelson Pereira wrote: > OUPS ! I sent this to you directly, sorry Dave ! OOPS! I replied to that one before I saw this one! > Now what? As I said, you need someone who knows about the php is_executable function to suggest a few clues. You should probably mention wha

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Package: cygport-0.1.93-1

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:13:50PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bob Rossi wrote: > > I have a package called CGDB. Do I understand you correctly by > > thinking that cygport would help me easily be able to create a cygwin > > package?

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Package: cygport-0.1.93-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Rossi wrote: > I have a package called CGDB. Do I understand you correctly by > thinking that cygport would help me easily be able to create a cygwin > package? In the future, please respect the following: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE How

[ANNOUNCEMENT] New Package: cygport-0.1.93-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The following package has been added to the Cygwin net release: *** cygport-0.1.93-1 cygport is a brand new way to create Cygwin packages. More information is contained in the README, and a tutorial at the URL below. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-app

Re: keeping program running after closing of bash

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Tyler Spivey wrote: > How can I keep a program running after bash exits? If I run nohup, I > have no luck - since pressing control-d or logging out of the terminal > window will kill the process that nohup started. > Any tips? Use 'setsid' (a program) or 'disown' (a bash buil

keeping program running after closing of bash

How can I keep a program running after bash exits? If I run nohup, I have no luck - since pressing control-d or logging out of the terminal window will kill the process that nohup started. Any tips? Thanks, Tyler -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

OUPS ! I sent this to you directly, sorry Dave ! I appologize Dave, I should have given more details but was unsure what to say... After your suggestion, I looked at the script and found this: // check binaries if (!is_executable($s_rsync)) { writeln("WARNING: The rsync program: '$s_rsync'

Re: python: update soon?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Tishler wrote: > Done. > > Thanks for the nudge. :,) And thank you for the quick version bump! BTW, for your next release, would you mind making a /usr/lib/libpython2.4.dll.a -> /usr/lib/python2.4/config/libpython2.4.dll.a symlink? It would h

Re: gcc-3.4.4-2 progress report

Dave Korn wrote : > I don't know what went wrong with D yet. I do not know if this is the same I posted in April: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00979.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00822.html Cheers, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#un

Re: ssh (protocol 2) crash on brand new T2600 dual core cpu (Dell Latitude D620)

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:36:25PM +0200, Andreas Loebel wrote: >Hi all, > >I observed a ssh (protocol 2) crash (using cvs, rsync, scp, unison, >etc.) only on my brand new T2600 dual core cpu whenever the load on the >ssh tunnel raises. > >I have also noticed a thread about "scp timeout on dual-c

Re: Python 2.4.1-1 time.altzone does not include DST offset

Jason, [...] Done. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1490224&group_id=5470&atid=305470 Since your patch was accepted, I have applied it to the Cygwin Python 2.4.3-1 package that I just released. time.altzone is now OK and rdiff-backup [Maybe ITP] now works

Re: console question

I find a full screen console for each monitor is the way to go. the programme 'screen' is a better way to juggle multiple windows than any grpahics window manager in my experience, Mac OS X has nice transparencies, but it doesnt interoperate with X11 very well (at all afaik). On Thu, 18 M

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

On 18 May 2006 18:15, Nelson Pereira wrote: > Ok, that explains it, > > But still does not explain why im getting : > > WARNING: The rsync program: '/bin/rsync' is not valid. You really do need to improve the level of detail of your bug reports. Saying "I'm trying to get rsync to work" doesn'

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

Ok, that explains it, But still does not explain why im getting : WARNING: The rsync program: '/bin/rsync' is not valid. Regards, npereira On 18 May 2006 17:42, Nelson Pereira wrote: > Also, > > Not sure if this is relevant or not, but thought I would mention it. > > In windows, when I lo

Re: console question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you use a 640x480 screen? Full screen for a console sounds like a grand waste of field of vision. Eh, I *love* my full-screen consoles... sooo much text you can see at once! Of course, I also have no fewer than... um... four ;) monitors here. -- Matthew Hey, buddy

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

On 18 May 2006 17:42, Nelson Pereira wrote: > Also, > > Not sure if this is relevant or not, but thought I would mention it. > > In windows, when I look at c:\cygwin\usr\bin there is nothing in that > folder > But when I do an LS on /usr/bin, I see all the EXE files... Yes: /usr/bin is just a

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

Also, Not sure if this is relevant or not, but thought I would mention it. In windows, when I look at c:\cygwin\usr\bin there is nothing in that folder But when I do an LS on /usr/bin, I see all the EXE files... Is this normal? Regards, > I'm trying to get rsync to work, but I get this mes

RE: Rsync invalid?!?

Actualy, both the version on cywin 2.6.3 is the same version as what is running on the server im trying to access. Do you have anyother idea how to fix this? I tried installing from source but still having the same problem. Regards, > I'm trying to get rsync to work, but I get this message:

ssh (protocol 2) crash on brand new T2600 dual core cpu (Dell Latitude D620)

Hi all, I observed a ssh (protocol 2) crash (using cvs, rsync, scp, unison, etc.) only on my brand new T2600 dual core cpu whenever the load on the ssh tunnel raises. I have also noticed a thread about "scp timeout on dual-core processor", which sounds very similar, but provides no solution.

Re: rvxt-20050409-1 console problem [SUMMARY]

Charles Wilson wrote: I'm leaning toward this solution, in a more generic sense, like: "gui-switcher.exe --config=/etc/rxvt-selector.conf" It'll go into the checkX package since it'll leverage a lot of the same code. And that's why I need to track down these issues with rxvt-unicode-X+run+

Re: Inconsistency in find ... -name ...

Eric Blake wrote: [snip] And be aware that my suggested alias is not perfect (think exit codes, among other things alias find='_find() { local result; trap "set +f; trap SIGINT" SIGINT find "$@"; result=$?; set +f; trap SIGINT return $result; }; set -f; _find' An improvement? --

Re: Rsync invalid?!?

I'm trying to get rsync to work, but I get this message: Rsync ver = 2.6.6 WARNING: The rsync program: '/bin/rsync' is not valid. Does anyone know why im getting this message? Rsync runs on the client and the server. This message means they our out of sync, no pun intended. The two programs

Re: PHP for Cygwin

Can anyone please help me compile PHP5 with Apache1.3 ? Im desperate... I've been trying to do this for 2 weeks now. If you didn't manage already then you should pretty much give up on this and use php as a cgi/fcgi under apache or lighttpd. rereading the thread, i noticed you said: I have a

Re: "fork problem" debugging

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Bryan D. Thomas wrote: > "Igor Peshansky" wrote: > > I've been plagued by these problems for a while (since you didn't provide > > full links in your message, I don't know whether you cited my message > > among them without a lot of cutting-and-pasting). > > I didn't cite your

Rsync invalid?!?

Hi all, I'm trying to get rsync to work, but I get this message: Rsync ver = 2.6.6 WARNING: The rsync program: '/bin/rsync' is not valid. Does anyone know why im getting this message? Regards, npereira -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: python: update soon?

Yaakov, On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:26:25PM -0500, Yaakov S wrote: > Could we have an update to python soon? Done. Thanks for the nudge. :,) Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscr

Re: Python 2.4.1-1 time.altzone does not include DST offset

Christian, On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > Sorry, but I'm timezone challenged. So, I recommend submitting your > > patch to http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=305470 for > > consideration. > > Done. > http://sourceforge

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated Cygwin Package: python-2.4.3-1

New News: === I have updated the version of Python to 2.4.3-1. The tarballs should be available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly. The following are the notable changes since the previous release: o upgrade to Python 2.4.3 o apply SourceForge patch #1490224 to fix the time.altzone

Re: [RFA] patch for run.exe -- ATTN: ago

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >As detailed here: >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-05/msg00471.html > >run.exe currently launches clients without any stdio handles and without >any console at all. That's over-ambitious: what run REALLY should do is >launch the c

RE: telnet: tcp/telnet: unknown service (XP)

On 18 May 2006 12:59, Jose Luis Fernandez wrote: > --- Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >> any. Ok, let's see.. >> >> Output from C:\cygwin\bin\id.exe (nontsec) >> UID: 12554(jlfdiaz) GID: 10545(mkgroup-l-d) >> 0(root) 544(Administradores) >> 545(Usuarios) >> 105

Re: "fork problem" debugging

"Igor Peshansky" wrote: > I've been plagued by these problems for a while (since you didn't provide > full links in your message, I don't know whether you cited my message > among them without a lot of cutting-and-pasting). I didn't cite your message[1], though it was one of the sources of the su

Re: [RFA] patch for run.exe -- ATTN: ago

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 02:45 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > run.exe currently launches clients without any stdio handles and without > any console at all. That's over-ambitious: what run REALLY should do is > launch the client with a *hidden* console and *working* stdio handles. > > Since run.ex

RE: telnet: tcp/telnet: unknown service (XP)

On 18 May 2006 07:38, Jose Luis Fernandez wrote: > After doing a lot more googleing, I've stumbled upon > this fix. Wonder if you know about this issue? Yes, of course we do. This is a duplicate of the post you sent last week. Oh, I get it. You just resent an old post as an easy way to

RE: Internet Apps (cvs, lynx, svn) spits out an error about not being able to connect to the internet

On 18 May 2006 02:23, Charli Li wrote: > socket. The internet features worked before some time, but now it is > completely blocked! > --- > BTW, is this a problem with Cygwin or is this a problem with my config? 10 to 1 you've misconfigured your firewall or anti-virus or similar security rela

Re: setup - duplicating cygwin

Hi Igor, > Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted. Oops - sorry. Some people prefer it :-( Does not include me actually. It gets a little hard to follow if it's not consistent. > On Wed, 17 May 2006, Jim Easton wrote: > > > > From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >