Re: cygwin quite mode install with non default packages

Hi Larry, Thanks for the reply. It works... Also it installs the packages when I add the package in "misc" category. Thanks, Shaick. On 4/23/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shaick mohamed wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to install cygwin in quite mode with selecting few packag

RE: Windows 95 support ?

> From: Samuel Thibault > > Gary R. Van Sickle, le Mon 24 Apr 2006 23:20:55 -0500, a écrit : > > > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/SetupInstaller/SetupInstalle > > r.exe > > Same result as when I manually copied MSVCRT.DLL to my system > for getting the usual setup.exe running: when I

RE: Windows 95 support ?

> From: Brian Dessent > > "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > > > Looking through the source tarball brings up another issue though: > > there's no copy of the GPL included with the source, nor > could I find > > one pending in cvs for an upcoming release. I took the liberty to > > include a copy

Re: Windows 95 support ?

"Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > Looking through the source tarball brings up another issue though: there's > no copy of the GPL included with the source, nor could I find one pending in > cvs for an upcoming release. I took the liberty to include a copy in > SetupInstaller.exe; it gets installed in

RE: Windows 95 support ?

> From: Brian Dessent > "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > > > locate said source. However, it is not where this page < > > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html> indicates it is > > ("Source code for setup.exe is available from > > http://cygwin.com/setup/."; - no, it isn't, at least no

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Samuel Thibault wrote: > Cygwin installed and running fine. > > So "IE3 required" should somehow be added to FAQs. Well I'm not sure it's going to be asked that frequently given the age and obscurity of such systems. However I have checked in the attached so that this is documented on the setup

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Samuel Thibault, le Wed 26 Apr 2006 02:15:53 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 26 Apr 2006 01:43:44 +0200, a écrit : > > Only IE2 is installed by default. I'll try to get subsequent versions. > > With IE3 installed, setup.exe runs fine. It now has troubles connecting > to mirror sites, b

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Samuel Thibault, le Wed 26 Apr 2006 01:43:44 +0200, a écrit : > Only IE2 is installed by default. I'll try to get subsequent versions. With IE3 installed, setup.exe runs fine. It now has troubles connecting to mirror sites, but I guess this is because mirror sites use FTP (which is filtered by my

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Brian Dessent, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 15:05:17 -0700, a écrit : > That's just the standard PE header version fields, which isn't really > useful. The meaningful version is stored as a resource and can be > viewed in explorer: right click, Properties, Version tab, "Product > Version". It should be bet

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 23:57:46 +0100, a écrit : > > there's a difference there that matters. I don't remember w95 all that > > well - > > does it install winsock and tcp/ip by default, or was it an optional > > component > > back then? > > Win95 did include TCP/IP in the stock install,

Re: Windows 95 support ?

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:04:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Christopher Faylor, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 14:05:54 -0400, a ?crit : >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:01:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ^^^ tsk, tsk. This really is a losin

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:53:00PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >I looked at the differences and I think the problem is due to one of >them. Yep, no doubt about it. There's got to be a change in there >that's the cause of this problem. Thanks for narrowing it down, Larry. That really helps

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn wrote: > You know, we may be barking up the wrong hippo here. Perhaps it's now worth > installing IE4 on the recalcitrant machine and see if having the whole package > actually does make the difference or not; maybe there's *another* significant I think it's entirely appropriate to r

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Brian Dessent wrote: I don't recall which minimum version setup.exe was coded to require, but it seems that not even having IE3 (comctl32 v4.7) is probably going to be a problem. I have a foggy recollection that IE3 was exactly the requirement, at least at the time this requirement was being di

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 22:57, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 22:43:43 +0100, a écrit : >> Sounds like the comctl32 theory would be the next one to test then. > > It is installed, I don't know what is considered as version: > > MajorOSystemVersion 1 > MinorOSystemVersion

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: On 25 April 2006 21:43, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: Ernie Coskrey wrote: it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario that causes this problem to occur. Maybe not, but if he can reproduce it it would be worth che

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 23:02, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 22:50:47 +0100, a écrit : >>> Is Setup.exe compressed or something? objdump -x doesn't show me its >>> list of needed symbols. >> >> Yep. You need to "upx -d" it. > > Mmm, upx succeded, and gave me a 830kB setup.ex

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Christopher Faylor, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 14:05:54 -0400, a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:01:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Setup.exe or msvc.dll? I guess either way, cygcheck should tell you. > > Maybe not: Cygcheck returns .\setup.exe C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\KERNEL32.DLL C:\WINDOWS

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Samuel Thibault wrote: > It is installed, I don't know what is considered as version: > > MajorOSystemVersion 1 > MinorOSystemVersion 0 > MajorImageVersion 0 > MinorImageVersion 0 > MajorSubsystemVersion 4 > MinorSubsystemVersion 0 > Win32Version That'

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 22:50:47 +0100, a écrit : > > Is Setup.exe compressed or something? objdump -x doesn't show me its > > list of needed symbols. > > Yep. You need to "upx -d" it. Mmm, upx succeded, and gave me a 830kB setup.exe, but objdump -x still doesn't show me any list of need

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 22:43:43 +0100, a écrit : > Sounds like the comctl32 theory would be the next one to test then. It is installed, I don't know what is considered as version: MajorOSystemVersion 1 MinorOSystemVersion 0 MajorImageVersion 0 MinorImageVersion 0 Majo

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 22:44, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], le Tue 25 Apr 2006 18:01:49 +, a écrit : >>> It's also possible that it has some dependencies on other dlls that >>> normally get >> ^^ >> Setup.exe or msvc.dll? > > Is Setup.exe compressed or something?

Re: Windows 95 support ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Tue 25 Apr 2006 18:01:49 +, a écrit : > > It's also possible that it has some dependencies on other dlls that > > normally get > ^^ > Setup.exe or msvc.dll? Is Setup.exe compressed or something? objdump -x doesn't show me its list of needed symbols.

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 22:38, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 18:34:48 +0100, a écrit : >> Hm. Sounds like a silent dll initialisation failure. I have to ask the >> dread question: do you have any debgging tools installed? Setup requires >> the following functions from msvcrt

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 18:34:48 +0100, a écrit : > Hm. Sounds like a silent dll initialisation failure. I have to ask the > dread question: do you have any debgging tools installed? Setup requires the > following functions from msvcrt: > > _access, _fdopen, _mktemp, _putenv, _read, _se

Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

Dave Korn wrote: ... diff -rup patch-2.5.8-8.orig/partime.c patch-2.5.8-8/partime.c --- patch-2.5.8-8.orig/partime.c2002-12-15 21:37:32.00100 +0100 +++ patch-2.5.8-8/partime.c 2006-04-25 12:14:59.797168500 +0200 @@ -753,6 +753,8 @@ parse_pattern_letter (s, c, t) int frac;

Re: php-5.1.2 on Cygwin

Pm mR wrote: > Can anybody give me some references, link, manual, anything to how to get > running > php-5.1.2 plus apache-2.2.0 on Cygwin? how to get a successful make and make > install of php on Cygwin? I followed the instructions on the third link below > and I've compiled but make > instal

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 25 April 2006 21:43, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > >> Ernie Coskrey wrote: >>> it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario that causes this problem to >>> occur. Maybe not, but if he can reproduce it it would be worth checking. >> >> I ca

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Samuel Thibault wrote: > Same result as when I manually copied MSVCRT.DLL to my system for > getting the usual setup.exe running: when I type setup.exe from > c:\cygwin\setup, the mouse cursor turns into a sandglass, then back to > a normal arrow shape, and I get the command.com prompt again witho

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On 25 April 2006 21:43, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > Ernie Coskrey wrote: >> it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario that causes this problem to >> occur. Maybe not, but if he can reproduce it it would be worth checking. > > I can reproduce the problem. That's not the issue. I cannot provide

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:39 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: >

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

Corinna Vinschen wrote: - The problem with Ctrl-C propagated to an unrelated child process (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00556.html) should be fixed. Thanks. This also solved a problem we had with a nohup'ed background processing receiving SIGINT from the interactive shell from wh

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

Ernie Coskrey wrote: > it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario that causes this problem to > occur. > Maybe not, but if he can reproduce it it would be worth checking. I can reproduce the problem. That's not the issue. I cannot provide a little test app to produce the problem at will. As

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: >Well, what I got from your message was that you were pretty sure that >your fix may have addressed the problem, but not 100% sure. That's why >I posted this follow-up; it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario >that causes this pr

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:26 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:37:46PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: >

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:37:46PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner >> [mailto:cygwin-owner]... Btw, to the OP: *please* don't quote raw email addresses, especially when it's the cygwin or cygwin-owner email address. Adding this is just noise and hel

Re: How to understand proc directory?

siegfried wrote: To find the documentation about /proc look in the Documentation directory under your kernel source root directory under filesystems. It is contained in a file name proc.txt. The path would be: Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt Could you give me a full pathname assuming the de

RE: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

On 25 April 2006 12:16, Christian Franke wrote: > Hi, > > the patch 2.5.8-8 options -Z and -T do not set filetime if the seconds > part > of the timestamp is greater or equal 59.5 > This is because maketime() does not handle "denormalized" times and > returns an error on tm_sec = 60. > The attach

RE: How to understand proc directory?

>To find the documentation about /proc look in the Documentation >directory under your kernel source root directory under filesystems. >It is contained in a file name proc.txt. The path would be: >Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt Could you give me a full pathname assuming the default installat

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Jerry D. Hedden > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:27 AM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot > > > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > >I have a cron job (a bash script) > >that

Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 25 16:17, Christian Franke wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Can you tell me exactly where the problem happens which leads to this patch, please? partime.c: ... parse_pattern_letter (s, c, t) ... case 's': /* second [00-60 followed by optional fractio

Re: How to understand proc directory?

Siegfried, To find the documentation about /proc look in the Documentation directory under your kernel source root directory under filesystems. It is contained in a file name proc.txt. The path would be: Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt Cal Erickson siegfried wrote: Where is a good place to

How to understand proc directory?

Where is a good place to start learning about the proc directory? I'm not all that familiar with it on *nix. Should I look in the cygwin documentation or go to the forums on unix.org (where they specialize in *nix but not cygwin)? I tried "man proc" and "info proc" and that did not work. Is there

Re: Windows 95 support ?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:01:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Setup.exe or msvc.dll? I guess either way, cygcheck should tell you. Maybe not: l:\>cygcheck /bin/cygcheck.exe d:/cygwin/bin/cygcheck.exe L:\WINXP\system32\msvcrt.dll L:\WINXP\syste

RE: Windows 95 support ?

-- Original message from "Dave Korn" : -- > On 25 April 2006 17:23, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 16:52:36 +0100, a écrit : > >> Did it leave a log file lying around anywhere? > > > > Not in the current directory, and neither of > > >

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

Jerry D. Hedden wrote: >I have a cron job (a bash script) that runs every 6 minutes, polling >and downloading info off the web. > >The problem is the script hangs at various places and the stuck >processes keep building up. > >Further, I have to kill these processes using the task monitor: kill >re

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 17:23, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 16:52:36 +0100, a écrit : >> Did it leave a log file lying around anywhere? > > Not in the current directory, and neither of > > find -name \*cyg\* > find -name \*setup\* > > found anything. > > Samuel Hm. So

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: tin-1.8.2-1

I've updated the version of tin to 1.8.2-1. New minor release with some bugfixes: - -- 1.8.2 release 20060425 "Shillay" -- 011) Andrey Simonenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ADD. updated russian translation FIX. ru.po 010) Urs Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

On Apr 25 16:17, Christian Franke wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Can you tell me exactly where the problem > > happens which leads to this patch, please? > > partime.c: > ... > parse_pattern_letter (s, c, t) > ... > case 's': /* second [00-60 followed by optional fraction] */ > { > int

php-5.1.2 on Cygwin

Can anybody give me some references, link, manual, anything to how to get running php-5.1.2 plus apache-2.2.0 on Cygwin? how to get a successful make and make install of php on Cygwin? I followed the instructions on the third link below and I've compiled but make install fail with the next err

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Dave Korn, le Tue 25 Apr 2006 16:52:36 +0100, a écrit : > Did it leave a log file lying around anywhere? Not in the current directory, and neither of find -name \*cyg\* find -name \*setup\* found anything. Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem repo

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:27:17AM -0700, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: >Jerry D. Hedden wrote: >>I have a cron job (a bash script) that runs every 6 minutes, polling >>and downloading info off the web. >> >>The problem is the script hangs at various places and the stuck >>processes keep building up. >> >

RE: Windows 95 support ?

On 25 April 2006 16:25, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Gary R. Van Sickle, le Mon 24 Apr 2006 23:20:55 -0500, a écrit : >> http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/SetupInstaller/SetupInstaller.exe > > Same result as when I manually copied MSVCRT.DLL to my system for > getting the usual setup.exe runn

Re: Windows 95 support ?

Gary R. Van Sickle, le Mon 24 Apr 2006 23:20:55 -0500, a écrit : > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/SetupInstaller/SetupInstaller.exe Same result as when I manually copied MSVCRT.DLL to my system for getting the usual setup.exe running: when I type setup.exe from c:\cygwin\setup, the mous

[OT] RE: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

On 25 April 2006 15:17, Christian Franke wrote: [ Note F-ups set ] > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> This doesn't look like a Cygwin specific problem. > > Agree, but the RCSID "$Id: partime.c,v ... corinna ...$" encourages me > to report the problem to this list first ;-) Then you're misinterpr

Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > This doesn't look like a Cygwin specific problem. Agree, but the RCSID "$Id: partime.c,v ... corinna ...$" encourages me to report the problem to this list first ;-) > I don't see this in > patch-2.5.9, nor in any patched version from Fedora Core or SuSE Linux. > Did y

Re: Cygwin and Interix interoperability?

Cary Jamison wrote: I read that Vista will have "Built-in NFS for Unix interoperability." [snip] If it is true, you may want to wait for Vista, where all your problems will be solved! :-) It's called "Services for UNIX-based Applications" (SUA). It's also in Windows 2003 R2, which is what I ha

Cygwin mount issue

Hi, I have an issue of “Permission denied” type, but it is more complicated than it seems. 1) I have Cygwin installed on a server (Windows server). I connect myself through Cygwin + SSH to another server of Windows type. I create a mount point ‘/home/toto’, of (binmode,cygexec) type, mapped to a

RE: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

Jerry D. Hedden wrote: >I have a cron job (a bash script) >that runs every 6 minutes, polling and downloading info off the web. > >The problem is the script hangs at various places and the stuck >processes keep building up. > >Further, I have to kill these processes using the task monitor: kill >

Re: emacs debugging conundrum (success ?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Angelo Graziosi on 4/23/2006 8:12 AM: > > Eric, > > I do not know if this can help but I have experimented the following. > > > cd /tmp > rm -rf emacs/ > tar -xjvf emacs-22.0.50-cvs-src.tar.bz2 > > mkdir emacs-build > cd emacs-bu

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Charles Wilson on 4/24/2006 10:42 PM: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> - Reintroducing the dirent member d_ino. 1.5.20 tries hard to return a >> useful d_ino value, which is supposed to be also the same as st_ino as >> returned by stat

Re: [OT] rxvt/UTF-8

Oliver Vecernik wrote: Hi, I'm quite sure this is not Cygwin related, but maybe someone can give me a pointer. I'm using rxvt without X to access all my hosts. Recently I added a box with UTF-8 output (Ubuntu 5.10) and found there is a special version urxvt somewhere, but I couldn't find it in

RE: Redirecting bash stdin

Dave wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> According to Dave on 4/21/2006 11:45 AM: >> >>> I'm trying to get a mingw GUI application to pipe commands to >>> cygwins bash by redirecting its stdin as described here >>> . >> >> Why not just spawn bash with command li

Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

On Apr 25 13:15, Christian Franke wrote: > Hi, > > the patch 2.5.8-8 options -Z and -T do not set filetime if the seconds > part > of the timestamp is greater or equal 59.5 > This is because maketime() does not handle "denormalized" times and > returns an error on tm_sec = 60. > The attached patch

[Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5

Hi, the patch 2.5.8-8 options -Z and -T do not set filetime if the seconds part of the timestamp is greater or equal 59.5 This is because maketime() does not handle "denormalized" times and returns an error on tm_sec = 60. The attached patch is a quick fix (and a testcase ;-) for this issue. Chri

[OT] rxvt/UTF-8

Hi, I'm quite sure this is not Cygwin related, but maybe someone can give me a pointer. I'm using rxvt without X to access all my hosts. Recently I added a box with UTF-8 output (Ubuntu 5.10) and found there is a special version urxvt somewhere, but I couldn't find it in the packages. Is there

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot

On Apr 25 00:42, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >- Reintroducing the dirent member d_ino. 1.5.20 tries hard to return a > > useful d_ino value, which is supposed to be also the same as st_ino as > > returned by stat(2) in all cases, regardless of the obstacles to do > > th