Re: Where is libxml2.dll?

Siegfried, . Thanks. It does sound like you do need to put "C:\cygwin\bin" in your Windows PATH, and make sure it gets propagated to Emacs. Alternatively, you could try to get Emacs to run "bash -l" as its shell (don't ask me how, I don't use Emacs).

Re: can not create a multi-volume archive using tar

Corinna Vinschen wrote: Did you try the -M or --multi-volume option of tar? Corinna Yes, I did. I even tried to force "tape size" to number below the size of floppy disk -- no success. I have experience with C, so I think I could find a problem, but I think that development could do it quicker.

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

GARY VANSICKLE wrote: Nobody's trying to force you to read. You shouldn't try to force them to write in a particular style. In the end communication, at least civil communication and I'd say any communication that is, in the long term, successsful, always requires *compromise* on both parties. Y

Re: Extending long threads

GARY VANSICKLE wrote: As a person who regularly uses HTML style email and posting (much to many peoples chargrin and complaints) I rarely "fester" them with "all" sorts of colors and fonts. Other HTML emails and posts I receive are also rarely "festered" with all sorts of colors and fonts. Why?

Re: bfd_get_section_size() undeclared

Op Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:03:20 +0100 schreef Dave Korn in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : > -Original Message- : > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Sean McCune : > Sent: 30 June 2004 04:51 : : > Howdy all, : > : > In building the latest source (checked out tonight), I'm getting the : > following error,

Re: Where is libxml2.dll?

Igor, That is a handy command! here is the results (from the emacs compile command: cd c:/busines/ cygcheck nd.exe Found: c:\util\nd.exe c:/util/nd.exe C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll

RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll

Larry, these messages are being repeated twice on the list. Josh, from now on, use reply to all. And take out your email address. That's what causing the repeats. Just use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall

RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll

At 10:58 PM 7/9/2004, you wrote: >Is it just the cygwin-1.5.10-3.tar.bz2 file or do I need anything else? I >remember hearing it is about 1.2MB in size so this sounds right. Thanks > >--Josh > That's the tarball you want. Oh, and see for specifics on the lic

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:37:10AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: [random, pointless verbiage deleted] Chris, can we just *plonk* this idiot already? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http:/

RE: Source Code for cygwin1.dll

Is it just the cygwin-1.5.10-3.tar.bz2 file or do I need anything else? I remember hearing it is about 1.2MB in size so this sounds right. Thanks --Josh -Original Message- From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:29 PM To: Joshua Halls; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cygwin1.dll

Yes it is open source (not GPL but the source code is freely available for no fee of any kind, it is DIKU derived). The whole point of releasing this is for people who would never download or touch cygwin (or code for that matter) to simply run on their machines for building/testing purposes. A

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Robert McNulty Junior wrote: > [snip] > I'm trying, however, to catch up on my cygwin updating. > Trying to figure out why GTK is telling me cygX11-6.dll (or something like > that) is missing. I hope we get a new X11 mainatainer soon. We do have an X11 maintainer. However, he

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> >I never used the word "fix", please do not misunderstand me. > I refer to > >this as "enhance". Yes, it is broken, by the way. > > So, it's "broken" and you want me to "enhance" it so that it > won't be "broken" anymore but you were not suggesting a > "fix". Got it. Can somebody show me w

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

I wrote him a letter last week. Get this. He's a Linux user who says Outlook and outlook express are the worm harvesters. My mother's old computer used to catch viruses all the time. The Source? Not Outlook, but Netscape Communicator. I've had a virus attack once. The I bought Norton Internet Secur

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> Nobody's trying to force you to read. You shouldn't try to > force them to write in a particular style. In the end > communication, at least civil communication and I'd say any > communication that is, in the long term, successsful, always > requires *compromise* on both parties. Your stated

RE: Extending long threads (was: RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?"))

> As a person who regularly uses HTML style email and posting > (much to many peoples chargrin and complaints) I rarely > "fester" them with "all" > sorts of colors and fonts. Other HTML emails and posts I > receive are also rarely "festered" with all sorts of colors > and fonts. Why? Because

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Responding before I read the whole thread, as I'm sure this gets a whole lot uglier: > > On Jul 9 11:03, William Blunn wrote: > > I think not. I think the counter argument would be "Yes we know it > > makes the occasional command-line appear line-wrapped, but > that is a > > nano-issue compa

Re: Source Code for cygwin1.dll

At 06:34 PM 7/9/2004, you wrote: >Hello, I am wishing to release a version of a Mud codebase I created and >have it packaged ready to run in windows. I am looking for the specific >files I need to have packaged up to meet the requirements for the source of >the cygwin1.dll. Are there specific fil

Source Code for cygwin1.dll

Hello, I am wishing to release a version of a Mud codebase I created and have it packaged ready to run in windows. I am looking for the specific files I need to have packaged up to meet the requirements for the source of the cygwin1.dll. Are there specific files required for the dll and do I need

Re: Where is libxml2.dll?

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Richard Heintze wrote: > I am running Windows 2003 server with on which I have > installed cygwin within the last month. > > I found a terrific little utility (webdav client) at > http://www.gohome.org/nd/ which I downloaded and > compiled (with gcc) with cygwin. At the bash co

Re: Password Problem - Cygwin

At 04:54 PM 7/9/2004, you wrote: >Hi there >Great job youre doing.I encountered this problem running >cygwin under Windows XP. >When changing my password with passwd.exe the program >exited but to my horror the password which i had entered in >did not work at my cygwin login or the windows login.

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:37:10AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Christopher Faylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: > >If I make this research, you do the change in the way the archives are >generated, so that all people in this thread be happy. Do we have a >deal? Here's how it works: You do the res

Re: /usr/lib and /lib mount question

igor- you're beautiful. : ) it said the mount device was busy, so i forced it and now it works like a charm. thanks! alan Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Alan Jaynes wrote: hi all- after installing gcc with the latest setup.exe i receive this error message when running gcc: $ gcc

Password Problem - Cygwin

Hi there Great job youre doing.I encountered this problem running cygwin under Windows XP. When changing my password with passwd.exe the program exited but to my horror the password which i had entered in did not work at my cygwin login or the windows login. What could be the problem? Thank you n

HOw to install emacs?

I've been downloading emacs from the gnu site and running addpm.exe to install it on Windows 2003. I notice there is an emacs in the cygwin distribution but I cannot figure out how to run it. Do not I need to run addpm.exe like I do in the GNU distribution? I cannot find this program in the cygwin

Where is libxml2.dll?

I am running Windows 2003 server with on which I have installed cygwin within the last month. I found a terrific little utility (webdav client) at http://www.gohome.org/nd/ which I downloaded and compiled (with gcc) with cygwin. At the bash command prompt, it appears to work. However, it is inte

Re: can not create a multi-volume archive using tar

On Jul 9 20:55, a111 wrote: > Sometime I need to move data between unix machines and win2k. I know, > that cygwin can use raw drives, so 'tar -cvf /dev/fd0' can do a work for > me. But this command does not work correctly with files which is bigger > then 1.4MB -- it can not write data to

FYI: negative error status: gcc vs. cl

Igor could be right about (status &= 0x), just in case is not masked by _exit() as for msvcrt exit() % cat err.c #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { if (argc == 1) return (0); exit(strtol(argv[1], NULL, 16)); } - b31 = b16 = 0 - % err-cl 0x7ffeff5a ; printf "%

RE: can not create a multi-volume archive using tar

> From: a111 > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:56 PM > Sometime I need to move data between unix machines and win2k. I know, > that cygwin can use raw drives, so 'tar -cvf /dev/fd0' can do a work for > me. But this command does not work correctly with files which is bigger > then 1.4MB -- it ca

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

*** Christopher Faylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: :) On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:24:22AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: :) >*** Christopher Faylor ...: :) >>Maybe you're being purposely obtuse. I don't know. My point was :) >>that if I send specially formatted text in my messages to a technical :) >

Re: Building DLL

At 11:24 AM 7/9/2004, you wrote: >>Put all the functions into a library. Link the application and the >>modules against this library (building only the appA's main() into >>the executable). > >Hmmm, not sure if I can convinve the XFCE developers of such a change, as it's fairly >major. > >>It wa

Re: /usr/lib and /lib mount question

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:56:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Alan Jaynes wrote: >>after installing gcc with the latest setup.exe i receive this error >>message when running gcc: >> >>$ gcc >>gcc: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/specs: No such file or directory >> >>

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:24:22AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Christopher Faylor ...: >>Maybe you're being purposely obtuse. I don't know. My point was that >>if I send specially formatted text in my messages to a technical >>mailing list I don't want the archiving software to unformat it

Re: /usr/lib and /lib mount question

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Alan Jaynes wrote: hi all- after installing gcc with the latest setup.exe i receive this error message when running gcc: $ gcc gcc: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/specs: No such file or directory as such, make becomes completely unusable as do most configure scripts. i di

/usr/lib and /lib mount question

hi all- after installing gcc with the latest setup.exe i receive this error message when running gcc: $ gcc gcc: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/specs: No such file or directory as such, make becomes completely unusable as do most configure scripts. i discovered /lib is mounted on /usr/lib

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

*** Christopher Faylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: :) On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:18:30AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: :) >*** Christopher Faylor :) >([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: :) > :) >:) On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: :) >:) >I have set up several web-based systems which

can not create a multi-volume archive using tar

Sometime I need to move data between unix machines and win2k. I know, that cygwin can use raw drives, so 'tar -cvf /dev/fd0' can do a work for me. But this command does not work correctly with files which is bigger then 1.4MB -- it can not write data to diskettes as multivolume. Did anybody try

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:38:11AM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: >On Friday, July 09, 2004 10:39 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote > >> On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>> I have set up several web-based systems which do this, and it wasn't >>> hard. >> >>> On Thu, Jul

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:18:30AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Christopher Faylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: > >:) On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >:) >I have set up several web-based systems which do this, and it wasn't >:) >hard. >:) >:) >On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 a

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Friday, July 09, 2004 10:39 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >> I have set up several web-based systems which do this, and it wasn't >> hard. > >> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Finally, you (

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

*** Christopher Faylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: :) On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: :) >I have set up several web-based systems which do this, and it wasn't :) >hard. :) :) >On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: :) >>Finally, you (Igor)

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

This is a top post, sorry about that, I normally do not do this, but in order to show my point I will have to do it. Corinna, I agree with you 99.%, however, there's a consequence to your words that you are not seeing, which is this. Imagine that I were to read your post on a PDA, the w

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:03:00AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >Think of it this way: If we had already accepted that the web archive >system wrapped flowed text, and someone came up arguing that it should >not "because it breaks long command lines", would they be given the time >of day? Let's se

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >I have set up several web-based systems which do this, and it wasn't >hard. >On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:26:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Finally, you (Igor) are right that we are not going to change the >>sourceware.org soft

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Dave Korn wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Andrew DeFaria Sent: 09 July 2004 16:03 Dave Korn wrote: There's another phrase that goes: "If you're archiving people's posts for all time, there is a moral obligation on you to archive them absolutely *verbatim* and not

Re: Building DLL

Put all the functions into a library. Link the application and the modules against this library (building only the appA's main() into the executable). Hmmm, not sure if I can convinve the XFCE developers of such a change, as it's fairly major. It was also reported that creating an import librar

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Brian Dessent wrote: William Blunn wrote: I only wish that I could go back in time and show the inventor of the havoc they have wreaked by making it turn off wrapping by default. I'm pretty sure you were joking here but if not... That's the whole point of PRE, that it *doesn't* wrap. It's for te

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Andrew DeFaria > Sent: 09 July 2004 16:03 > Dave Korn wrote: > > > There's another phrase that goes: > > > > "If you're archiving people's posts for all time, there is a moral > > obligation on you to archive them absolutely *verbat

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Corinna Vinschen wrote: Fact is, I dislike when people don't give a damn for existing common rules which have turned out to work fine for all other people. You are ascribing malintent where either ignorance or disagreement may be present. You are assuming they don't give a damn instead of the mo

Re: negative error status: gcc vs. cl

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Daniel Lungu wrote: >> -wrong-nil(!)-exit-status- >> % nerr-cl.exe; echo $? >> 0 >> >> $? cannot distinguish exit(0) from exit(-2) ... this is >> logical anarchy! > >:) Ah, but those aren't just two different values passed to exit, they are >:)

Re: Building DLL

Maarten wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> You don't need .def files on Cygwin. Just add -no-undefined to >> libxyz_LDFLAGS. > OK, I'm making progress with getting XFCE to compile under cygwin (with > help of one of the XFCE developers), but now we're running into the > following: > XFCE ha

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Dave Korn wrote: There's another phrase that goes: "If you're archiving people's posts for all time, there is a moral obligation on you to archive them absolutely *verbatim* and not tamper with, edit, reformat, or otherwise alter them." Never heard that one. Got a reference? -- Jack Kevorkian for

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Brian Dessent wrote: My main problem with it is that it breaks quoting. When I reply to a message with no line breaks, my mail program has to either A) pick an arbitrary margin and reflow the entire message to that margin, adding ">" to the first column of each line, or B) Insert a ">" at the b

Re: Building DLL

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: You don't need .def files on Cygwin. Just add -no-undefined to libxyz_LDFLAGS. OK, I'm making progress with getting XFCE to compile under cygwin (with help of one of the XFCE developers), but now we're running into the following: XFCE has a plugin mechanism, based on sha

Re: OpenSSH disconnects when Windows user logging out

Hello. when using an secureshell on an Windows-Box, running cygwin and openssh, i receive an disconnect when the Windows user just loggs off (no shutdown nor restart !). I just tried the same. My remote session didn't disconnect when the local user logged off. That's strange. I see an errormessag

Re: "regtool 1.8" on "cygwin 1.5.10": Recursively remove registry keys

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Systemtechnik wrote: > >> it seems that regtool cannot remove keys in registry if it's "not > >> empty". I have to remove all subkeys/values first, otherwise i get an > >> "Error (5) access denied". Is this true, or is there a way to remove > >> whole "trees" from the registry

Re: OpenSSH disconnects when Windows user logging out

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Systemtechnik wrote: > Hello > > >> when using an secureshell on an Windows-Box, running cygwin and > >> openssh, i receive an disconnect when the Windows user just loggs off > >> (no shutdown nor restart !). > > > > I just tried the same. My remote session didn't disconnect w

Re: error installing sshd on win2k3

Dave Korn wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Thorsten Kampe Sent: 09 July 2004 11:27 * Sam Edge (2004-07-09 10:18 +0200) I am installing sshd on win2k3. Windows 2300?! Microsoft must be /really/ confident about this version of the OS. ;-) No, win2k3 is win20003.

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, William Blunn wrote: > Christopher Faylor quoted Igor Pechtchanski: > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:56:49PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > >I've already explained why I don't think format=flowed is appropriate > > >for this list (in particular, long command lines will also

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of William Blunn > Sent: 09 July 2004 12:30 > > That's the whole point of PRE, that it *doesn't* wrap. > > I don't think that is the whole point of PRE. > > I think the whole point of PRE is that newlines and other > whitespace in > th

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> Yeah it appears in ... [RFC1855] as "Be conservative in what you send > and liberal in what you receive.", just a few paragraphs above where > it recommends: > > "Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line with a > carriage return." Limiting line length to fewer than 65 cha

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

William Blunn wrote: > > That's the whole point of PRE, that it *doesn't* wrap. > > I don't think that is the whole point of PRE. > > I think the whole point of PRE is that newlines and other whitespace in > the HTML source are interpreted literally. > > It appears that the design committee too

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> > What really needs to be improved is mhonarc or whatever app is used to > > make the web archives. It should detect when the message contains no > > linebreaks and not use PRE but rather let the browser render it as > > normal text, so that it will be wrapped to the width of the screen as > > i

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

"Jon A. Lambert" wrote: > Yeah it appears in RFC1885 Sorry that's RFC 1855 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

"William Blunn" wrote: > There is a phrase that goes: > > "Be permissive in what you accept, and strict in what you send" > > Now this is just a phrase, and by itself does not have significance. Yeah it appears in RFC1885 as "Be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you receive.",

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> > I only wish that I could go back in time and show the inventor of > > the havoc they have wreaked by making it turn off wrapping by default. > > I'm pretty sure you were joking here but if not... Actually I was serious. > That's the whole point of PRE, that it *doesn't* wrap. I don't think

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:34:01AM +0100, William Blunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Dessent wrote: > > RFC2822 (which obsoletes the old RFC822) states in section 2.2.1: > > > > There are two limits that this standard places on the number of > > characters in a line. Each line of characters

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Dave Korn wrote: > > What really needs to be improved is mhonarc or whatever app is used to > > make the web archives. It should detect when the message contains no > > linebreaks and not use PRE but rather let the browser render it as > > normal text, so that it will be wrapped to the width of t

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Jul 9 11:46, William Blunn wrote: > It does appear though that these rules are arbitrary, without benefit, > yet have identifiable problems, and their current sole purpose appears > to be to identify members of a club. If you want to see it that way, fine with me. Fact is, I dislike when peop

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> "If you're archiving people's posts for all time, there is a moral > obligation on you to archive them absolutely *verbatim* and not tamper > with, edit, reformat, or otherwise alter them." I wasn't suggesting tampering with them. Information should be preserved where possible. My contenti

Re: "regtool 1.8" on "cygwin 1.5.10": Recursively remove registry keys

it seems that regtool cannot remove keys in registry if it's "not empty". I have to remove all subkeys/values first, otherwise i get an "Error (5) access denied". Is this true, or is there a way to remove whole "trees" from the registry ? AFAICS, regtool has no "recursive" option. Patches welcome.

Re: OpenSSH disconnects when Windows user logging out

Hello when using an secureshell on an Windows-Box, running cygwin and openssh, i receive an disconnect when the Windows user just loggs off (no shutdown nor restart !). I just tried the same. My remote session didn't disconnect when the local user logged off. That's strange. I see an errormessage

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Dessent > Sent: 09 July 2004 12:02 > William Blunn wrote: > > > I only wish that I could go back in time and show the > inventor of > > the havoc they have wreaked by making it turn off wrapping > by default. > > I'm pretty

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

William Blunn wrote: > I only wish that I could go back in time and show the inventor of > the havoc they have wreaked by making it turn off wrapping by default. I'm pretty sure you were joking here but if not... That's the whole point of PRE, that it *doesn't* wrap. It's for text that's been

RE: error installing sshd on win2k3

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Thorsten Kampe > Sent: 09 July 2004 11:27 > > * Sam Edge (2004-07-09 10:18 +0200) > >> I am installing sshd on win2k3. > > > > Windows 2300?! Microsoft must be /really/ confident about > this version > > of the OS. ;-) > > No, win

RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of William Blunn > Sent: 09 July 2004 11:28 > > This seems like a reasonable discussion that can hopefully > resolve this > > issue once and for all, LOL, you haven't been on the internet long have you? > There is a phrase that goes

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> On Jul 9 11:03, William Blunn wrote: > > I think not. I think the counter argument would be "Yes we know it > > makes the occasional command-line appear line-wrapped, but that is a > > nano-issue compared to the downside which is that it will mess up the > > display for all the flowed messages,

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

William Blunn wrote: > I believe that at this point they are talking about the byte stream that > represents the encoded form of the message. > > If you are using quoted-printable encoding, then all encoded lines will > be 78 characters or less, and so will be fitting in with the "SHOULD" > speci

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> This seems like a reasonable discussion that can hopefully resolve this > issue once and for all, and so, IMO, belongs on the list rather than in > private e-mail. There is a phrase that goes: "Be permissive in what you accept, and strict in what you send" Now this is just a phrase, and b

Re: error installing sshd on win2k3

* Sam Edge (2004-07-09 10:18 +0200) >> I am installing sshd on win2k3. > > Windows 2300?! Microsoft must be /really/ confident about this version > of the OS. ;-) No, win2k3 is win20003. But I admire people like PJ that are not afraid that people will laugh at them - just for the sake of saving

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-1.5.6-3

Charles wrote: > The libtool-devel package contains the 1.5.6 version of libtool, a > cross-platform tool for building libraries (shared and otherwise). It > enables relatively trouble-free builds of DLLs on cygwin and mingw. > Changes from 1.5-3: > o routine update to latest release version >

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Jul 9 11:03, William Blunn wrote: > I think not. I think the counter argument would be "Yes we know it > makes the occasional command-line appear line-wrapped, but that is a > nano-issue compared to the downside which is that it will mess up the > display for all the flowed messages, which is

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> On Jul 9 10:36, William Blunn wrote: > > > My mail reader is no "modern" mail reader and I'm not interested to use > > > one since I'm old-fashioned enough to dislike the mouse. So my mail reader > > > is running in an 80 column window. > > > > > Unwrapped mails and weird line breaks drop my a

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Christopher Faylor quoted Igor Pechtchanski: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:56:49PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >I've already explained why I don't think format=flowed is appropriate > >for this list (in particular, long command lines will also be wrapped > >if it ever were to be accepted). "L

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Jul 9 10:36, William Blunn wrote: > > My mail reader is no "modern" mail reader and I'm not interested to use > > one since I'm old-fashioned enough to dislike the mouse. So my mail reader > > is running in an 80 column window. > > > Unwrapped mails and weird line breaks drop my attention spa

Re: correction to openssh-3.8p1-1 openssh.README

On Jul 9 07:46, Brian D. Carlstrom wrote: > I was trying to build openssh-3.8p1-1 to debug an authorized_keys > problem. I followed the instructions from: > > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/openssh.README > > regarding the configure options. I also made sure I followed this > requirement: > > Y

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

> My mail reader is no "modern" mail reader and I'm not interested to use > one since I'm old-fashioned enough to dislike the mouse. So my mail reader > is running in an 80 column window. > Unwrapped mails and weird line breaks drop my attention span to read > the whole posting to a minimum. How

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

Brian Dessent wrote: > RFC2822 (which obsoletes the old RFC822) states in section 2.2.1: > > There are two limits that this standard places on the number of > characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than 998 > characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding th

Re: negative error status: gcc vs. cl

> -wrong-nil(!)-exit-status- > % nerr-cl.exe; echo $? > 0 > > $? cannot distinguish exit(0) from exit(-2) ... this is > logical anarchy! :) Ah, but those aren't just two different values passed to exit, they are :) in fact two entirely different versions of the exit function: gcc links

Re: "regtool 1.8" on "cygwin 1.5.10": Recursively remove registry keys

On Jul 9 09:32, Systemtechnik wrote: > Hello, > > it seems that regtool cannot remove keys in registry if it's "not > empty". > I have to remove all subkeys/values first, otherwise i get an "Error > (5) access denied". > Is this true, or is there a way to remove whole "trees" from the > regist

Re: OpenSSH disconnects when Windows user logging out

On Jul 9 08:17, Systemtechnik wrote: > Hello, > > when using an secureshell on an Windows-Box, running cygwin and > openssh, i receive an disconnect when the Windows user just loggs off > (no shutdown nor restart !). > The sshd service will never get stopped. I can reconncet without a > notice

Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?")

On Jul 8 18:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:56:49PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >I've already explained why I don't think format=flowed is appropriate > >for this list (in particular, long command lines will also be wrapped > >if it ever were to be accepted). In a

Re: error installing sshd on win2k3

> I am installing sshd on win2k3. Windows 2300?! Microsoft must be /really/ confident about this version of the OS. ;-) (Sorry.) -- Sam Edge -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://c

correction to openssh-3.8p1-1 openssh.README

I was trying to build openssh-3.8p1-1 to debug an authorized_keys problem. I followed the instructions from: /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/openssh.README regarding the configure options. I also made sure I followed this requirement: You must have installed the zlib and openssl-devel packages t

"regtool 1.8" on "cygwin 1.5.10": Recursively remove registry keys

Hello, it seems that regtool cannot remove keys in registry if it's "not empty". I have to remove all subkeys/values first, otherwise i get an "Error (5) access denied". Is this true, or is there a way to remove whole "trees" from the registry ? Oliver Geisen ---