uite
meet every need, and that there's no reason to have to "pull out" a
message from the kernel when 99% of the work can be done at build time,
with the runtime only needing to use a special, more complex error code
to get the job done.
In other words, I agree that the perror(3)/er
f music files on 2 msdosfs partitions to update the music
> library?
Yes, if it's dirtying pages on msdosfs (by, say, changing access times)
and msdosfs has a putpages routine, _and_ that routine is called as a
result of the destroy_object call. Otherwise no.
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECT
remain static with only minor tweaks from release to
release. The really big changes were done in the marked commentary by
the developers involved.
It worked, but of course it required discipline, both personal and
imposed. That's the tricky part in an all-volunteer effort.
--
Frank Mayhar [
ink that it would be
useful. It certainly helped _me_.
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
___
cvs-a
RNS=6 truss(1).
>
> Wait. I'm lost. Isn't truss(1) broken on FreeBSD?
Considering I was using it under 6.1 just yesterday, I think the answer
to your question is "no." Well, that's not _quite_ true, but it works
well enough most of the time. Although I
