On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 22:50 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:29:03 +0000 (UTC) > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > to be identical, as if they were just clones of one original routine. > "Clones" as in identical and could be refactored into one function?
As "refactored" is just a pretentious term for "rewritten," yes, pretty much. All of the xxx_reclaim() functions that I fixed were essentially identical. > Do you think this panic can be triggered by e.g. letting rhytmbox run > over a lot of music files on 2 msdosfs partitions to update the music > library? Yes, if it's dirtying pages on msdosfs (by, say, changing access times) and msdosfs has a putpages routine, _and_ that routine is called as a result of the destroy_object call. Otherwise no. -- Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
