Quoting Dag-Erling Smrgrav, who wrote on Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:45:56AM +0200
..
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Because older servers don't have RSA keys (or rather, they don't load
> > them). Instead of just inverting the order, whoever decided that we
> > should prefer D
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Hi,
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So I had an updated ssh client in use since at least Aug 22 and it
didn't bother me to ask about any remote machines.
Now that people are updating their 7-STABLE machines, those 7-STABLE
machines w
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because older servers don't have RSA keys (or rather, they don't load
> them). Instead of just inverting the order, whoever decided that we
> should prefer DSA to RSA (before my time) just removed the two lines of
> code that load the RSA key.
Ah,
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I had an updated ssh client in use since at least Aug 22 and it
> didn't bother me to ask about any remote machines.
>
> Now that people are updating their 7-STABLE machines, those 7-STABLE
> machines with an OpenSSH 5.1p1 start to pop up and do the
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Hi,
des 2008-09-01 23:50:56 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
SVN rev 182662 on 2008-09-01 23:50:56Z by des
Belatedly add a notice about the reversed order of preference for OpenSSH
au
Adam McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shouldn't the warning about authentication keys be here too,
> not just in HEAD?
It doesn't apply to 7.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
Shouldn't the warning about authentication keys be here too,
not just in HEAD? Thanks
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:53:55PM +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
des 2008-09-01 23:53:55 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7)
.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:59:01AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> jb 2008-08-27 06:59:01 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7)
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> SVN rev 182252 on 2008-08-27 06:59:01Z by jb
>
> Add a mention of
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, John Birrell wrote:
jb 2008-08-27 06:59:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7)
.UPDATING
Log:
SVN rev 182252 on 2008-08-27 06:59:01Z by jb
Add a mention of DTrace and the dog that are the commit me
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Colin Percival wrote:
cperciva2008-06-19 06:36:10 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7_0)
.UPDATING
sys/conf newvers.sh
sys/netinet tcp.h tcp_output.c
Log:
SVN rev 179871 on 2008-06-19
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:33:03AM -0800, Darren Reed wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> thompsa 2008-02-20 07:50:13 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> .UPDATING share/man/man4 Makefile
>> sys/conf NOTES files options
Andrew Thompson wrote:
thompsa 2008-02-20 07:50:13 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
share/man/man4 Makefile
sys/conf NOTES files options
Added files:
sys/modules/geom/geom_linux_lvm Makefile
Log:
Rename
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:02:02PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My count (using ports/devel/id-utils) says there are 627 references to
>> int64_t in the tree - half of them in sys.
>
>You missed a few, there are 1727 references to {,u}int64_t in HEA
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dag-Erling_Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
: > > Both C99 and POSIX *require* int64_t and uint64_t on all platforms that
: > > have 64-bit integer types.
: > >
: > > FreeBSD ha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:40:09AM -1000, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
> [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
> Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys
> param.h ]
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:40:09 -1000
Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
> [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
> Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:28:27AM -1000, Juli Mallett wrote:
* Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
[ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c s
* Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
[ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys
param.h ]
> But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place? You seem to
> as
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:28:27AM -1000, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
> [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
> Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys
> param.h ]
&g
* Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ]
[ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys
param.h ]
> You are wrong, I haven't recieved a request for back-out yet, and
>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:52:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes:
> > > Both C99 and POSIX *require* int64_t and uint64_t on all platforms that
> > > have 64-bit integer types.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD has never run on any pl
Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Both C99 and POSIX *require* int64_t and uint64_t on all platforms that
> > have 64-bit integer types.
> >
> > FreeBSD has never run on any platform that doesn't. I don't think
> > NetBSD or OpenBSD has either, nor Solaris,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:17:47PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:35:15AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:46:53AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >> $ find /usr/src/sys -name \*.[ch] -a -type f \
> >> | xargs grep int[0-9][0-9]_t | wc -l
> >
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:14:35PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:55:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> >
> > > Userland code should be portable and useful to other systems in the
> > > chosen domain of compatibility, e.g., C99 or POSIX, unless there
> > > are subst
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:55:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Excuse me, but did you notice that fts(3) is not a part of sys? It's
> > generic userland code, albeit it's contaminated by system-dependent
> > parts for performance or whatever.
>
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:55:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Excuse me, but did you notice that fts(3) is not a part of sys? It's
generic userland code, albeit it's contaminated by system-dependent
parts for performance or wha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:55:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Excuse me, but did you notice that fts(3) is not a part of sys? It's
> > generic userland code, albeit it's contaminated by system-dependent
> > parts for performance or whatever.
>
>
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My count (using ports/devel/id-utils) says there are 627 references to
> int64_t in the tree - half of them in sys.
You missed a few, there are 1727 references to {,u}int64_t in HEAD src,
excluding src/sys.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr% egrep -r '\' src | grep
Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excuse me, but did you notice that fts(3) is not a part of sys? It's
> generic userland code, albeit it's contaminated by system-dependent
> parts for performance or whatever.
Irrelevant.
> But let intN_t be mostly confined in the kernel and system-depend
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:35:15AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:46:53AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>> $ find /usr/src/sys -name \*.[ch] -a -type f \
>> | xargs grep int[0-9][0-9]_t | wc -l
>> 37026
>>
>> I think that shows we can depend on int64_t existing
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 01:46:53AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:38:13AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:33:34PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > > o For things that should be at
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:38:13AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:33:34PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > o For things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
> > > and not int64_t, as the lat
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Our fts(3) API, as inherited from 4.4BSD, suffers from integer
fields in FTS and FTSENT structs being too narrow. In addition,
the narrow types creep from there into fts.c. As a result, fts(3)
consumers, e.g., find(1) or rm(1), can't handle file trees an ordinary
use
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:33:34PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > o For things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
> > and not int64_t, as the latter is an optional type.
>
> I don't follow - int64_t is an ISO-C99
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> o For things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
> and not int64_t, as the latter is an optional type.
I don't follow - int64_t is an ISO-C99 type, and we have it in FreeBSD.
Is this code expected to be taken from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> yar 2008-01-26 17:09:41 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files: .UPDATING include
> fts.h lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c
> fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c sys/sys
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> marius 2007-10-24 20:51:44 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> sys/dev/pci pci_user.c
> sys/sys param.h pciio.h
> Log:
> Add ABI backwards compatibility to t
Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> julian 2007-10-21 04:17:29 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
>>.UPDATING
>> Log:
>> Note the renaming of kthread_xxx to kproc_xxx in 82
>>
>> R
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
julian 2007-10-21 04:17:29 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
.UPDATING
Log:
Note the renaming of kthread_xxx to kproc_xxx in 82
RevisionChangesPath
1.416.2.34 +8 -0
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:51:08PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:29:14PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wro
Hi Alexey,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:29:14PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > >
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:23:54PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> wkoszek 2007-05-16 17:23:54 UTC
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> sys/conf Makefile.amd64 Makefile.arm Makefile.i386
> Makefile.ia64 Makefile.pc98
>
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Even so, does it read that 4.X is not vulnerable?
No one who isn't capable of 100% self-support should still be using
FreeBSD 4.x. No one should be using BIND 8 (which is in 4.x) at all.
It will soon be EOL'ed by ISC, and it hasn't been developed in a long
time now.
hth
On 2007.08.03 15:29:14 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > > applicable to it? It w
On 2007.08.03 15:27:06 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:07:28AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > > applicable to it?
> >
> > No and no. Support has been dropped for 4
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:29:14PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > > applicable
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:29:14PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > > applicable
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> > applicable to it? It was not quite clear from the SA.
>
> RELENG_4 reached EOL on J
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:07:28AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:48:20PM +, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> >> simon 2007-08-01 20:48:19 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_5_5)
> >> .
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:48:20PM +, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>> simon 2007-08-01 20:48:19 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_5_5)
>> .UPDATING
>> contrib/bind9/bin/named client.c
>>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:44:23AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not
> applicable to it? I was not quite clear from the SA.
RELENG_4 reached EOL on January 31st, 2007.
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:48:20PM +, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> simon 2007-08-01 20:48:19 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_5_5)
> .UPDATING
> contrib/bind9/bin/named client.c
> contrib/bind9/lib/dns dispatch.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:33:56PM +, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote..
> gshapiro2007-06-12 17:33:56 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Spaces to tab
Dust to dust?
--
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:28:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
Hello Yar,
This commit appears to break bootstrapping -CURRENT from RELENG_6 and
6.2-RELEASE. I'm not exactly sure why and will continue to investigate.
I'd say that it's rather unlikely, but I
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:28:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
Hello Yar,
This commit appears to break bootstrapping -CURRENT from RELENG_6 and
6.2-RELEASE. I'm not exactly sure why and will continue to investigate.
I'd say that it's rather unlikely, but I
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:28:06PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> Hello Yar,
>
> This commit appears to break bootstrapping -CURRENT from RELENG_6 and
> 6.2-RELEASE. I'm not exactly sure why and will continue to investigate.
I'd say that it's rather unlikely, but I may be missing some point.
> Rig
Hello Yar,
This commit appears to break bootstrapping -CURRENT from RELENG_6 and
6.2-RELEASE. I'm not exactly sure why and will continue to investigate.
Right now I'm getting errors (EINVAL) and panics at boot time in ifconfig
when trying to configure interfaces after upgrading the kernel fr
> Do people who have already recompiled their milter packages now need to
> recompile again to get back to the old ABI...?
No, that is not needed. (See my latest HEADS UP posting to
freebsd-current). Also, keep in mind this only applies to the HEAD
(-CURRENT) at the moment. The code will be
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
gshapiro2007-04-23 22:15:07 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
Add a new note to revoke the 20070408 note. Is is no longer necessary
to recompile milters.
MFC after: 4 days
Gregor
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:36:43AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
By the way, is possible to do some dummy port that would represent
the kernel and/or base system to do things more automate?
Let's just say it's a very complicated project and leave it at that.
I und
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:36:43AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> By the way, is possible to do some dummy port that would represent
> the kernel and/or base system to do things more automate?
Let's just say it's a very complicated project and leave it at that.
Kris
pgpQtHTI1D2ib.pgp
Description
By the way, is possible to do some dummy port that would represent
the kernel and/or base system to do things more automate?
rik
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
gshapiro2007-04-14 16:26:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
Include a no
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 15:42, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> OK, 700015 corresponds to 26-Mar-06, and I see the changes in
> gensnmptree since then:
>
> --- gensnmptree/gensnmptree.1 27 Feb 2006 16:16:16 - 1.1.1.6
> +++ gensnmptree/gensnmptree.1 30 May 2006 07:46:52 - 1.1.1.7
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:47, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>> I hadn't done anything with the system since about June 2006. I don't
> >>> rule
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:47, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>> I hadn't done anything with the system since about June 2006. I don't
>>> rule out the possibility that while trying to fix the buildworld problem
>>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:02:06AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:47, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > I hadn't done anything with the system since about June 2006. I don't
> > > rule out the possibility tha
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:47, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I hadn't done anything with the system since about June 2006. I don't
> > rule out the possibility that while trying to fix the buildworld problem
> > that I copied in /usr
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> I hadn't done anything with the system since about June 2006. I don't
> rule out the possibility that while trying to fix the buildworld problem
> that I copied in /usr/src/include to /usr/include, but I definitely
> didn't do it befor
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:49:43PM +, Nate Lawson wrote:
>> njl 2007-02-19 22:49:43 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> .UPDATING
>> Log:
>> Note problems I had with bsnmpd while updating from an older -curre
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:49:43PM +, Nate Lawson wrote:
> njl 2007-02-19 22:49:43 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Note problems I had with bsnmpd while updating from an older -current.
> There may be better wa
Robert Watson wrote:
I'm not sure MFC'ing this functional removal to a -STABLE branch is
wise. Instead, it should be marked as deprecated in future 6.x
releases and be gone in 7.0.
Agree, use of MFC keyword here was purely provisional.
BMS
___
cvs
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
bms 2007-02-07 16:04:13 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
sys/netinet ip_mroute.c ip_mroute.h
sys/sys param.h
Log:
Remove support for IPIP tunnels in IPv4 multicast forw
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:01:40PM +, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> rodrigc 2006-11-22 23:01:40 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Mention that the following binaries have been detached
> from the build: mount_devfs, mount
If memory serves me right, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> marck 2006-10-04 21:09:12 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository (doc committer)
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Add an entry regarding NMBCLUSTERS kernel option remove, as it c
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Log:
> Add an entry regarding NMBCLUSTERS kernel option remove, as it can affect
> (though in rare curcumstances) existing kernel configurations.
>
> Requested by: simon
> Reworded by:brd
> Approved by:security-officer (simon)
> Approved by:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:50:48PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:46:45PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:00:51PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > > bms 2006-09-28 13:00:51 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:46:45PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:00:51PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > bms 2006-09-28 13:00:51 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > .UPDATING
> > Log:
> > Note the rem
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:00:51PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> bms 2006-09-28 13:00:51 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Note the removal of tcpslice
Also add to ObsoleteFiles.inc?
Kris
pgpqGmgeI5bjF.pgp
Descri
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:40:16AM +, Julian Elischer wrote:
> julian 2006-08-24 05:40:16 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
> .UPDATING
> sys/netinet ip_fastfwd.c ip_input.c ip_output.c
> sys/conf
Thanks!
rik
Colin Percival:
cperciva2006-08-23 22:06:40 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_4_11)
.UPDATING
sys/conf newvers.sh
sys/net if_spppsubr.c
Log:
Correct buffer overflow in the hand
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:41:06AM +, Julian Elischer wrote:
> julian 2006-08-17 00:41:06 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .UPDATING
> Log:
> Note IPFIREWALL_FOWARD_EXTENDED is now gone.
> | +20060816:
> | + The IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_E
Hello Robert,
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Thomas Wintergerst wrote:
>
>> twinterg2006-08-06 19:03:27 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
>>.UPDATING
>>sys/i386/include i4b_ioctl.h
>>sys/i4b/layer
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Thomas Wintergerst wrote:
twinterg2006-08-06 19:03:27 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
.UPDATING
sys/i386/include i4b_ioctl.h
sys/i4b/layer4 i4b_l4mgmt.c
usr.sbin/i4b/isdnd controller.c
L
On Friday 07 July 2006 03:25, Colin Percival wrote:
> cperciva2006-07-07 07:25:21 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6_1)
> .UPDATING
> etc/rc.d jail
> sys/conf newvers.sh
> Log:
> Fix problem
+-Le 13/05/06 06:08 +, Max Laier a dit :
| mlaier 2006-05-13 06:08:25 UTC
|
| FreeBSD src repository
|
| Modified files:
| .UPDATING
| sys/sys param.h
| Log:
| Update UPDATING and bump __FreeBSD_version for the ip6fw removal.
I think th
On May 3, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
Belatedly add 2 entries relating to the introduction of scc(4) and
the overhaul of puc(4). On sparc64 people may end up without serial
console if they upgrade without adding scc(4
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
pjd 2006-01-24 15:58:11 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
.UPDATING Log:
Document the move of setkey from /usr/sbin/ to /sbin/.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
pjd 2006-01-24 15:58:11 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
.UPDATING Log:
Document the move of setkey from /usr/sbin/ to /sbin/.
A bit late, but bette
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
pjd 2006-01-24 15:58:11 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
.UPDATING
Log:
Document the move of setkey from /usr/sbin/ to /sbin/.
A bit late, but better than never.
Reminded by:bz
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:54:51PM +, Julian Elischer wrote:
> | +20060118:
> | + This actually occured some time ago, but installing the kernel
> | + now also installs a bunch of symbol files for the kernel modules.
> | + This increases the size of /boot/kenrnel to about 67Mbytes. You
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:13:56 +0100
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:55:55 + (UTC)
> Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > MFC nearly everything of the soundsystem
>
>
> I wish every one a happy evening of Dec 31... or the lac
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:55:55 + (UTC)
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> MFC nearly everything of the soundsystem
I wish every one a happy evening of Dec 31... or the lack of it now
that everyone rushes out to play with the shiny improved sound
subsystem instead of en
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:53:30PM +, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_5)
T> .UPDATING
T> Log:
T> - In upgrade from 4.x paragraph prefer "5.x" instead of "-current". 5.x
T> isn't CURRENT anymore.
In general we need severe editing
93 matches
Mail list logo
