On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:40:09 -1000 Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ 2008-01-28 ] > [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen > Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys > param.h ] > > But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place? You seem to > > assume that my commit was only to kill the innocent int64_t. > > Yes, actually. I found some of the decisions strange, the work overall > worthwhile and the "long long" change particularly gauche. Several others > have > said things that I thought at the time, and I was following the discussion > closely. (Your bogus standards reasoning was, in particular, a red flag, and > I > suspect that that caught some people off-guard since your reasoning is > fallacious and that you would have gotten less grief for the change if you had > given less strange justifications (even no justifications) initially.) You > said > that you had received no back-out request, so I made one. Instead of > acknowledging that you had now received a single backout request which you > would > not honor (and I was only referring to the "long long" bit, for clarity), you > chose to grouch that I was rehashing old points (I do not believe backout > requests should come without reasoning attached.) I'm not sure I completely agree with a backout but I agree with changing the types in a follow up commit. -- Tom Rhodes _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
