Re: Potential confusion in http_proxy.c and a recommendation

2020-11-09 Thread Hasabnis, Niranjan via curl-library
Thanks for confirming. The proposal in PR 6193 looks good to me. Thanks, Niranjan. From: Daniel Stenberg Date: Monday, November 9, 2020 at 2:51 PM To: Hasabnis, Niranjan via curl-library Cc: Hasabnis, Niranjan , Gottschlich, Justin Subject: Re: Potential confusion in http_proxy.c and a

Re: Potential confusion in http_proxy.c and a recommendation

2020-11-09 Thread Daniel Stenberg via curl-library
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Hasabnis, Niranjan via curl-library wrote: We believe that using “if (s->keepon > 1)” would eliminate this confusion and capture the intended semantics precisely. I think you've pointed out code that could be written clearer, yes. But I think an even better improvement to

Potential confusion in http_proxy.c and a recommendation

2020-11-09 Thread Hasabnis, Niranjan via curl-library
Hello CURL developers, My name is Niranjan and I work at Intel. We were recently analyzing various open-source GitHub repositories for idiosyncratic programming patterns. We came across “if (s->keepon > TRUE)” pattern at line 360 in lib/http_proxy.c, and we believe that this pattern is a bit co