Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-04 Thread Christian Montoya
> I'm not talking about whether it's "valid" for IE to parse these > comments. That's a theoretical issue that is irrelevant, because IE's > doing it whether it's "right" or not. I'm talking about whether they > are valid HTML. They are. You can write comments that have bracketed > text in them

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-04 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > So, I could also write something like this: > > -- Just to extend that, in case someone use the information given by Microsoft[1] to go a bit further... The validator do not like what Microsoft call "Downlevel-revealed Conditional Comments". Example[2]

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-04 Thread Zoe M. Gillenwater
Christian Montoya wrote: >>>Considering conditional comments are not valid, >>> >>> >>Just a nitpick for the benefit of newbies... Conditional comments *are* >>valid. Every user agent other than IE recognizes them as regular valid >>HTML comments. This is why you can stick invalid stuff in

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Gerhard Hoogterp
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 21:57, Abyss Information wrote: > I hate IE transparency, is there anyway to be able to set the PNG > transparency in IE 6 without affecting the validation of a document or CSS? What I do is to stuff all the IE specific fixes in a seperate ie.css and include that on

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Christian Montoya
> >Considering conditional comments are not valid, > > > > Just a nitpick for the benefit of newbies... Conditional comments *are* > valid. Every user agent other than IE recognizes them as regular valid > HTML comments. This is why you can stick invalid stuff inside them and > the validator does

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Zoe M. Gillenwater
Christian Montoya wrote: >Considering conditional comments are not valid, > Just a nitpick for the benefit of newbies... Conditional comments *are* valid. Every user agent other than IE recognizes them as regular valid HTML comments. This is why you can stick invalid stuff inside them and t

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Christian Montoya
> > I use: > > * html #yourDiv { >filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='./img/ > logo.png',sizingMethod='scale'); > } > > Not valid, but whatevah... I aint that anal. ;) > Considering conditional comments are not valid, just put that behind a conditional comment a

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Michael Hulse
On Nov 2, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Abyss Information wrote: > > I hate IE transparency, is there anyway to be able to set the PNG > transparency in IE 6 without affecting the validation of a document or > CSS? > I use: * html #yourDiv { filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoade

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-03 Thread Zoe M. Gillenwater
Abyss Information wrote: >I hate IE transparency, is there anyway to be able to set the PNG >transparency in IE 6 without affecting the validation of a document or CSS? > > Does your CSS really need to be valid? If the presence of the filter thing for IE is the only invalid thing in your sty

Re: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-02 Thread ross
The only way I know is javascript. I hate IE too. R. - Original Message - From: "Abyss Information" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CSS-Discuss" Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:57 PM Subject: [css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS > Hi All,, > > > I ha

[css-d] IE-Transparency with CSS

2005-11-02 Thread Abyss Information
Hi All,, I hate IE transparency, is there anyway to be able to set the PNG transparency in IE 6 without affecting the validation of a document or CSS? Thanks heaps, Abyss __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discus