Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > So, I could also write something like this: > > <!--[I love kittens]> yes I do <![end]-->
<!--[I love kittens]> me too ;-) <![end]--> -------------- Just to extend that, in case someone use the information given by Microsoft[1] to go a bit further... The validator do not like what Microsoft call "Downlevel-revealed Conditional Comments". Example[2] - my own page on the subject of 'conditional comments': <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Fcontents%2Fwd_1_02_01.html> ...is clearly non-valid because of such comments. While the next page[3] where I use a "trick" comment in an ordinary 'conditional comment': <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gunlaug.no%2Fcontents%2Fwd_1_02_02.html> ...seems valid enough. The 'ordinary vs. "trick" comment'[4] looks like this: <!--[if !IE]> something for IE <![endif]--> <!--[if !IE]><--> IE can't see this <!--><![endif]--> This might be of use to someone for hiding CSS (or other stuff) from IE/win, so I think I'm "on topic" ;-) regards Georg [1]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp [2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_01.html [3]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_02.html [4]http://www.scss.com.au/family/andrew/webdesign/msie/ -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
