Date setting examples in manual

2024-03-24 Thread wrotycz
Set new date: date +%Y%m%d -s "20010203"Set time: date +%T -s "11:12:13"Regards Wrotycz

Correction to pl po translation

2024-03-24 Thread wrotycz
I noticed some minor mistakes or inconsistences in translation so I send correction. Regards Wrotycz --- pl.po~ 2023-08-29 14:00:27.0 + +++ pl.po 2024-03-24 18:59:24.0 + @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ msgstr "Błędne wyrażenie regularne" # ? - rzm #: lib

Re: Re: Date setting examples in manual

2024-03-29 Thread wrotycz
> I think one example (the first) would be enough in the manualBetter than nothing, but helps. Thanks> Note we do give more details in the full documentationAnd who reads that? If it's not in `prog --help`, nor in `man prog`, then everyone is going to go to search engine rather than

Re: Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-04-04 Thread wrotycz
> lz4 and zstd are quite a bit less resource-hungry than xz Is it? By default, and up to -19 level, zstd uses 8 MiB (sliding) window, when xz uses 8 MiB at level 6, which is default, default and doubles is every next level. More over that, xz compression with 8 MiB window uses 96 MiB of memor

Re: Modify buffering of standard streams via environment variables (not LD_PRELOAD)?

2024-04-20 Thread wrotycz
> Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 16:45 Carl Edquist wrote: > > However, stdout and stderr are still separate streams even if they refer to the same output file/pipe/device, so partial lines are not interleaved in the order that they were printed. > > will output "abc\n123\n" instead of "a1b2c3\n\n", e

hash-sum - print only the checksum - quiet mode

2024-12-17 Thread wrotycz
For some time I had in mind option to hash-sum that would only print checksum without filename as it is very useful when using calculated hashes. As there is no simple way to get rid of it, other than with external command like awk, I decided to add something simple to hash-sum command/s. I

Re: Re: hash-sum - print only the checksum --hash

2024-12-17 Thread wrotycz
Here is a diff with separate option for hash only ( -H, --hash ). If you decide to change the name you do not have to wrote it from the scratch. Hope it passes quality control. digest-H.diff Description: Binary data

Re: Re: hash-sum - print only the checksum - quiet mode

2024-12-17 Thread wrotycz
  s/awkward/hideous/   What is pretty, according to you, then?   

Re: Re: hash-sum - print only the checksum - quiet mode

2024-12-17 Thread wrotycz
An option that clearly communicates what change is made to the 
output,  rather than an option which is traditionally (even in the same 
command!)  used to indicate that there is no output apart from error 
conditions. I get the point. And agree.    So What do you propose?    I 
though

Re: Re: hash-sum - print only the checksum - quiet mode

2024-12-17 Thread wrotycz
  "Using the --quiet option for this seems a little awkward.   
Is it pun to awk?   One reason we added the --raw option, was for this single 
input case.   It is not the same.   I.e. please consider using something like 
this example:"   cksum --raw -a md5 | basenc --base16   What is a 
diffe

Re: Re: hash-sum - print only the checksum - quiet mode

2024-12-18 Thread wrotycz
I'm unsure of which command hash-sum is,I meant every hash sum that uses mechanism in digest.c, and is called XYZsum, namely md5/sha1/sha256/...sum. but I note that toybox has been using -b (brief) in md5sum through sha3sum for 10 years now: In coreutils XXXsum - stands for --binary [1