On my openSUSE:Tumbleweed system, the info pages seem to have changed
the quoting style for the strftime for the conversion specifiers from
the good old '%a' or `%a' styles to ‘%a’.
$ info libc date calendar format | grep '^[^a-z%]*%.[^a-z%]*$' | od -tx1z |
sed 1q
000 20 20 20 20 20 e2
On 23/03/2024 10:18, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On my openSUSE:Tumbleweed system, the info pages seem to have changed
the quoting style for the strftime for the conversion specifiers from
the good old '%a' or `%a' styles to ‘%a’.
$ info libc date calendar format | grep '^[^a-z%]*%.[^a-z%]*$' |
On 3/23/24 14:57, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 23/03/2024 10:18, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On my openSUSE:Tumbleweed system, the info pages seem to have changed
the quoting style for the strftime for the conversion specifiers from
the good old '%a' or `%a' styles to ‘%a’.
$ info libc date calend
We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week
so any testing you can do on various different systems
between now and then would be most welcome.
This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.4 release.
--
You can download the coreutils snapshot in xz for
Pádraig Brady writes:
> We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week
> so any testing you can do on various different systems
> between now and then would be most welcome.
> This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.4 release.
>
I hit this build failure on Linux with GCC 14:
src/unam
On 23/03/2024 17:47, Sam James wrote:
Pádraig Brady writes:
We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week
so any testing you can do on various different systems
between now and then would be most welcome.
This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.4 release.
I hit this build failur
Pádraig Brady writes:
> On 23/03/2024 17:47, Sam James wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady writes:
>>
>>> We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week
>>> so any testing you can do on various different systems
>>> between now and then would be most welcome.
>>> This release comes about 30 weeks afte
Thank you!! Really happy to have this feature in upstream coreutils!
Would you mind giving me feedback on the patch I sent?
What can I do to make future contributions acceptable?
I'm not very familiar with the GNU development processes.
I just tried to follow the coding conventions.
Thanks,
Mat
