Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-15 Thread Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
Michael Pratt wrote: > > > What's needed is just the "modules" files which are missing > > > > > > No, the gl/lib/ and gl/tests/ subdirectories are input to gnulib-tool as > > well. > > Not only gl/modules/. > > > > And you should list the files to add to the tarball, not directories. > > > T

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-15 Thread Michael Pratt
Hi Bruno, Thanks for making a patch to save us some time. On Monday, October 14th, 2024 at 05:23, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > Michael Pratt wrote: > > > What's needed is just the "modules" files which are missing > > > No, the gl/lib/ and gl/tests/ subdirectories are input to gnulib-tool

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-14 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 14/10/2024 10:23, Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion wrote: Michael Pratt wrote: adding the "gl" directory from source to EXTRA_DIST or however you all would do it I agree with the suggestion: In GNU gettext, I have a couple of local gnulib modules as well, and since gnulib-t

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-14 Thread Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
Michael Pratt wrote: > adding the "gl" directory from source to EXTRA_DIST or however > you all would do it I agree with the suggestion: In GNU gettext, I have a couple of local gnulib modules as well, and since gnulib-tool takes them as input, I view them as source code. Since the GCS [1] say th

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-12 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/10/2024 05:37, Michael Pratt wrote: Hi Pádraig, Does anything I mentioned sound like a good idea? Would you prefer if I send a patch in case you are busy? On Wednesday, October 9th, 2024 at 01:21, Michael Pratt wrote: While compression would help in this case, it's really not neces

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-11 Thread Michael Pratt
Hi Pádraig, Does anything I mentioned sound like a good idea? Would you prefer if I send a patch in case you are busy? On Wednesday, October 9th, 2024 at 01:21, Michael Pratt wrote: > > While compression would help in this case, it's really not necessary to have > extra copies > of the so

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-08 Thread Michael Pratt
Hi Pádraig, On Monday, October 7th, 2024 at 07:03, Pádraig Brady wrote: > Well maybe, but then we'd have two copies of these files in the release > tarball. While compression would help in this case, it's really not necessary to have extra copies of the source itself. What's needed is just t

Re: Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-07 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 07/10/2024 01:39, Michael Pratt wrote: In other words, adding the "gl" directory from source to EXTRA_DIST or however you all would do it, for those who wish to use the bootstrap script from a release, even though it is not recommended, whether it is a modification of those local modules, or

Please include the local gnulib modules in releases

2024-10-06 Thread Michael Pratt
In other words, adding the "gl" directory from source to EXTRA_DIST or however you all would do it, for those who wish to use the bootstrap script from a release, even though it is not recommended, whether it is a modification of those local modules, or something else in a local gnulib, so that