Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found
with Coverity Scan.
5 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan.
3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Re
Hi Martin,
To support #pragma once, the compiler tries to identify duplicate encounters
with the same file, but the check gcc actually performs to establish the
identity of the file is weak. Here's someone who made two copies of the same
header with different names, each with a #pragma once,
Arthur, you are not making an argument that any vendor should release their
source code as opensource. I agree that all of this code should be reviewed,
but if we complain about code quality and lack of testing for open sourced
code, but don't for closed source, that's an argument against any c
May 17, 2022, 11:40 by coreboot@coreboot.org:
> Just my opinion, and I'm intentionally replying off list.
>
Oops. Or not. :-/
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
Hi
I have patches that improve those platforms and wrote code that should make
some of
the AGESA platforms easier to transition to newer soon to be mandated
codepaths and I did so
with past codepath mandates with both code and review.
My message about moving code from the master branch was more o
Sorry, I guess I'm just sensitive about the topic of removing code, since, as
you say, it's been talked about a lot.
I obviously do appreciate your work on it.
Take care.
Martin
May 17, 2022, 12:17 by art...@aheymans.xyz:
> Hi
> I have patches that improve those platforms and wrote code that
Hi
Those arguments not to use #pragma once make a lot of sense. Thanks Martin!
I've made some good progress on getting boards to build with clang (each
x86 board now builds). Clang at least warns about #ifndef and #define lines
not being equal so we'd have that check covered.
Kind regards
Arthur
7 matches
Mail list logo
