Hi Iain,
On 5/13/21 8:15 PM, lain wrote:
> Hello Michal,
> i found the regarding problem.
> The board i got from aliexpress has an SUPERIO 8613 insteat of a
> SUPERIO 8772F, this other superio seem to be support by coreboot but
> dumbly changing this in the .config seems to fail, do you think you
Iain,
Also please check what is the CPU on your platform. Please run `cat
/proc/cpuinfo` and paste me the CPU brand string, because FW6 has
refreshed variants based on Kaby Lake Refresh CPUs and different Super
I/O ITE8613, which we will upload the source code to upstream coreboot soon.
On 5/13/2
Hello Michail
setting the register values for PCICLOCK to 25MHz as on the Braswell protectli
devices did the trick for me, i have serial working now flawlessly.
Did you see the git diff i send ?
I have trouble get superiotool to detect the SUPERIO chip it seems the current
version is not even p
Hi,
Glad to hear that you get that working. Interestingly it is the older
FW6 variant based on Kaby Lake so it should have ITE8772.
Do you have the log from supertiotool.log? Additionally
superiotool.err.log may be helpful. IT8613E should be supported.
Best regards,
--
Michał Żygowski
Firmware
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found
with Coverity Scan.
5 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 5 of 5 defect(s)
** CID 1453149: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
Strangely superiotool does not find anything atm.
Maybe it was a 1 in 1 mistake of an false IC soldered, i am still happy as
it works for me now, and dont have to touch it anymore.
Even the "support" Team from the seller things it shold come with an ITE8772,
very mysterious..
Did you ever s
Hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 7:38 PM lain via coreboot wrote:
>
> Probing for ITE Super I/O (init=standard) at 0x2e...
> Failed. Returned data: id=0x8613, rev=0x8
superiotool doesn't know about the IT8613E, but looks like there's one.
Best regards,
Angel
___
7 matches
Mail list logo
