On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:44:53 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Spec refinement, including acting on some feedback received for JDK-8266670:
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/7445#discussion_r906846794
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:59:30 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> If you compare the javadoc for the modifiers vs. accessFlags in each of
> ModuleDescriptor, Requires, Exports, and Opens then you'll see what I mean. I
> was hoping they could be consistent.
Ah, okay. Pushed docs updated as suggested for
> Spec refinement, including acting on some feedback received for JDK-8266670:
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/7445#discussion_r906846794
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brough
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:16:21 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleDescriptor.java line 217:
>>
>>> 215: /**
>>> 216: * {@return an unmodifiable set of the module {@linkplain
>>> AccessFlag
>>> 217: * requires flags}, possibly empt
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 06:56:53 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Spec refinement, including acting on some feedback received for JDK-8266670:
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/7445#discussion_r906846794
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleDescriptor.java line 217:
>
>> 215:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 05:05:33 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Spec refinement, including acting on some feedback received for JDK-8266670:
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/7445#discussion_r906846794
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleDescriptor.java line 217:
> 215: /**
>
