Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33

2025-02-19 Thread Nizar Benalla
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:06:42 GMT, Ian Myers wrote: >> make/common/Modules.gmk line 95: >> >>> 93: SPEC_SUBDIRS += share/specs >>> 94: >>> 95: MAN_SUBDIRS += share/man windows/man >> >> Hm, normally I'd say you should use `$(TARGET_OS)/man`, but we typically >> generate docs for all platforms

Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33

2025-02-18 Thread Ian Myers
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:15:08 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> Two groups of broken links appeared in the latest JDK docs, broken links to >> man pages and broken ietf links. >> >> - The windows tools markdown files were not being converted to HTML because >> they were placed under `windows/ma

Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33

2025-01-30 Thread Nizar Benalla
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:03:38 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: > Two groups of broken links appeared in the latest JDK docs, broken links to > man pages and broken ietf links. > > - The windows tools markdown files were not being converted to HTML because > they were placed under `windows/man` rather

Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33

2025-01-29 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:03:38 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: > Two groups of broken links appeared in the latest JDK docs, broken links to > man pages and broken ietf links. > > - The windows tools markdown files were not being converted to HTML because > they were placed under `windows/man` rather

Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33

2025-01-29 Thread Chen Liang
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:03:38 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote: > Two groups of broken links appeared in the latest JDK docs, broken links to > man pages and broken ietf links. > > - The windows tools markdown files were not being converted to HTML because > they were placed under `windows/man` rather