Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 19:46:05 GMT, He-Pin(kerr) wrote: >> Cool, I just encounter this problem, when I migrate to Virtual threads and >> set `jdk.virtualThreadScheduler.maxPoolSize` to 2500. >> >> Will this change backport to j21u, thanks. > >> @He-Pin I tried to backport this patch for you just

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 19:46:05 GMT, He-Pin(kerr) wrote: > I think the related issue should be backported too. That update is a huge update to FJP that includes API and behavior changes, the CSR has details. Maybe the starting out here is to first see if running with the JDK 22 EA builds address

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 13:41:39 GMT, kerr wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional commits >> since the las

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 13:41:39 GMT, kerr wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional commits >> since the las

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:56:55 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first >> keepAlive inactive period. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelate

Re: RFR: JDK-8319662 ForkJoinPool trims worker threads too slowly [v8]

> This update cascades timeouts to trim subsequent workers after the first > keepAlive inactive period. Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull reques