On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 13:41:39 GMT, kerr <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional commits >> since the last revision: >> >> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319662 >> - Remove unnecessary re-interrupt >> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319662 >> - Reduce oversignalling and contention; add test >> - Revert 2 lines in method scan >> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319662 >> - Split up method awaitWork; other associated changes. >> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319662 >> - tweak cascades; reinstate an @Contended; resolve JDK-8319498 >> - Support cascading idle timeouts > > Cool, I just encounter this problem, when I migrate to Virtual threads and > set `jdk.virtualThreadScheduler.maxPoolSize` to 2500. > > Will this change backport to j21u, thanks.
> @He-Pin I tried to backport this patch for you just now [1]. But it can't be > automatically backported because JDK-8288899 [2][3] also revised the file > `src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java`. Do you > want to backport these two patches? Or only this one? > > [1] > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/cc25d8b12bbab9dde9ade7762927dcb8d27e23c5#commitcomment-136982984 > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288899 > [3] https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14301 I think the related issue should be backported too. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16725#issuecomment-1890750696
