On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:41:18 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/zip/ZipFile/Zip64SizeTest.java line 112:
>>
>>> 110: ZipEntry e1 = new ZipEntry("first");
>>> 111: // Make room for an 8-byte ZIP64 extra field
>>> 112: e1.setExtra(createOpaqueExtra(
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 06:39:31 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Eirik Bjørsnøs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional
>> commits
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:09:35 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Please review this PR which suggests we speed up the `Zip64SizeTest` using a
>> small-sized ZIP64 ZIP file specifically created to reproduce the issue being
>> tested.
>>
>> The disk space requirement of this test is known to cause prob
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:09:35 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Please review this PR which suggests we speed up the `Zip64SizeTest` using a
>> small-sized ZIP64 ZIP file specifically created to reproduce the issue being
>> tested.
>>
>> The disk space requirement of this test is known to cause prob
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:09:35 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Please review this PR which suggests we speed up the `Zip64SizeTest` using a
>> small-sized ZIP64 ZIP file specifically created to reproduce the issue being
>> tested.
>>
>> The disk space requirement of this test is known to cause prob
> Please review this PR which suggests we speed up the `Zip64SizeTest` using a
> small-sized ZIP64 ZIP file specifically created to reproduce the issue being
> tested.
>
> The disk space requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some
> builds, see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk
