> Please review this PR which suggests we speed up the `Zip64SizeTest` using a 
> small-sized ZIP64 ZIP file specifically created to reproduce the issue being 
> tested.
> 
> The disk space requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some 
> builds, see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8259866)
> 
> By using a sparse file, we reduce consumed disk space from 5GB to 266 bytes 
> and also reduce the runtime from ~35 seconds to ~1 seconds on my Macbook Pro.
> 
> The PR also fixes the `@summary` tag, which seems to have been copied from an 
> unrelated test.

Eirik Bjørsnøs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional commits 
since the last revision:

 - Use a small ZIP64 file to reproduce the issue. Convert test to JUnit
 - Update copyright year for 2024
 - Use ENTRY instead of FILE when refering to names and sizes of file entries 
in the ZIP file
 - Merge branch 'master' into zip64-size-test-sparse
 - Merge branch 'master' into zip64-size-test-sparse
 - Sparse files must be created explicitly on NTFS
 - Merge branch 'master' into zip64-size-test-sparse
 - Merge branch 'master' into zip64-size-test-sparse
 - Make test method public
 - Add a missing "when" in Javadocs for SparseOutputStream
 - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ae023a61...41b2ba5e

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12948/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12948/files/adcca52c..41b2ba5e

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=12948&range=04
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=12948&range=03-04

  Stats: 1546371 lines in 16853 files changed: 754316 ins; 616810 del; 175245 
mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12948.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/12948/head:pull/12948

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12948

Reply via email to