On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 18:56:00 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> While technically not being necessary, it is definitively a good idea. I
>> will add it to the draft once we actually agreed that we really want to go
>> with this particular signature (see the discussion with Chen).
>
> Fixed in `String` a
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:48:11 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> This Pull Request proposes an implementation for
> [JDK-8343110](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343110): Adding the new
> method `public void getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, int
> dstBegin)` to the `CharSequence` inter
The comment provided in `store(Writer, String)` is added in addition to
the date comment:
if (comments != null) {
writeComments(bw, comments);
}
writeDateComment(bw);
The system property can be used to replace the date with a constant, but
a) it's not possib
distinct() doesn't require everything to be pulled. It can push elements
to the downstream as they come along for the first time. When
downstream.push returns false the gatherer is done.
As part of some experimentation I've implemented all intermediary
operations using gatherers. Most of them
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:27:00 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Revert 'inc should be faster than add on most CPUs'
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Reader.java line 214:
>
>
On 28/09/2024 18:15, Markus Karg wrote:
- Applications could use Apache Commons IO's CharSequenceReader. As it is an
open-source third-party dependency, some authors might not be allowed to use
it, or may not want to carry this additional burden just for the sake of
this single performance improv
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:34:32 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This Pull-Request implements [JEP-461](https://openjdk.org/jeps/461)
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 32 commits:
>
> - Lowering upper bounda
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:58:00 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> Currently if we create a record it's fields are compared in their
>> declaration order. This might be ineffective in cases when two objects have
>> "heavy" fields equals to each other, but different "lightweight" fields
>> (heavy and
f a native
call like malloc). Such custom implementations would need to be passed
around several method calls of my module. Still, this is something to
consider, as it does take away restricted calls away from my module to
the caller. Thanks for the hint!
Rob
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 19:21,
On 16/11/2023 18:15, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
On 16/11/2023 16:54, Rob Spoor wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
I don't think you understand what my module is doing. For instance,
it's not specifying the downcall method handles themselves, it's just
making it easy to define them. Maybe
java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.Lookup.html#hasFullPrivilegeAccess()
Maurizio
On 15/11/2023 17:13, Rob Spoor wrote:
Hello all,
I'm working on a module that makes working with FFM easier; think of
something like JNA. For instance, it allows creating structures
without having to ma
Hello all,
I'm working on a module that makes working with FFM easier; think of
something like JNA. For instance, it allows creating structures without
having to manually manage var handles etc.
My module uses restricted mehods like AddressLayout.withTargetLayout to
support pointers. Those c
ons/lang3/StringEscapeUtils.html#line.768>(template.interpolate());
On Oct 26, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Rob Spoor wrote:
I've been reading up on string templates, and I think it's a very cool feature.
However, writing a custom processor can be a lot of copy-paste work if you want
STR but with
I've been reading up on string templates, and I think it's a very cool
feature. However, writing a custom processor can be a lot of copy-paste
work if you want STR but with some extra translation applied. For
instance, if I'd want to have a URL encoding processor I would have to
write everythin
Check these:
*
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/20/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Map.html#unmodifiable:
"The iteration order of mappings is unspecified and is subject to change."
*
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/20/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Set.html#unmodifiable:
"The iteration
I found one similar issue, https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8015008,
but that was for an empty primitive iterator. I've created a bug report
with id 9073784.
On 11/08/2022 01:24, some-java-user-99206970363698485...@vodafonemail.de
wrote:
Hi,
could you please report this at https://bugrepo
Hi,
I was working on upgrading another library of mine from Java 8 to 11,
and I noticed my unit tests started failing. Some debugging traced the
cause back to java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableMap$UnmodifiableEntrySet
and its iterator() implementation.
In Java 8, the implementation only impl
17 matches
Mail list logo
