On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:48:11 GMT, Markus KARG <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This Pull Request proposes an implementation for 
> [JDK-8343110](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343110): Adding the new 
> method `public void getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, int 
> dstBegin)` to the `CharSequence` interface, providing a **bulk-read** 
> facility including a default implementation iterating over `charAt(int)`.
> 
> In addition, this Pull Request proposes to replace the implementation of 
> `Reader.of(CharSequence).read(char[] cbuf, int off, int len)` to invoke 
> `CharSequence.getChars(next, next + n, cbuf, off)` instead of utilizing 
> pattern matching for switch. Also, this PR proposes to implement 
> `CharBuffer.getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, int dstBegin)` as 
> an alias for `CharBuffer.get(srcBegin, dst, dstBegin, srcEnd - srcBegin)`.
> 
> To ensure quality...
> * ...the method signature and JavaDocs are adapted from 
> `AbstractStringBuilder.getChars(...)`.
> * ...this PR relies upon the existing tests for `Reader.of(CharSequence)`, as 
> these provide sufficient coverage of all changes introduced by this PR.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharSequence.java line 338:

> 336:      * @since 24
> 337:      */
> 338:     public default void getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, 
> int dstBegin) {

Shouldn't the `getChars` methods of `String`, `AbstractStringBuilder`, 
`StringBuilder` and `StringBuffer` be marked with `@Override`?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21730#discussion_r1817880004

Reply via email to