>
> You can see and hear Elwyn Berlekamp delivering a 2006 talk about
> "Mathematics and Go" (culminating in a discussion of "coupon go") at:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=005B561126D6A51E .
>
>
Thanks a lot for pointing out this very interesting video. Seemingly, the
nice historical
Thanks,
I looked at http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j2003
and its commentary
http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/j2003com.html
and found the rules confusing.
to start the terms capturable-1 2 and 3 are confusing.
a string that is capturable-1 or 2 is ALIVE. while capturable has the
connotation of being dea
Thanks for the early report! (I was sorry not to see Fudo Go in the
tournament. Were you involved with any of the other teams?)
Here are the second day knockout tournament unofficial results. Any
mistakes are my own. Thanks to the organizers for the live screencast!
1 KCC Igo
2 Katsunari
I watched the pro matches. It looked like a 4 dan beat Zen with 6 stones,
and a 9 dan beat KCC with 6 stones.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Ian Osgood
> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 9
Willemien wrote:
> I was thinking of implementing the
> new japanese rules
> http://home.snafu.de/jasiek/naj.html
> instead .
>
> But are they the easiest to implement territory rules?
What do you want?
1) The closest to real world Japanese rulesets?
Use the Japanese 2003 Rules plus some game e
compgo...@aol.com wrote:
It's the only pulication on Go that qualify as science.
There are even several Go books that qualify as mathematics. Not to
mention hundreds or thousands of files or news messages. In fact, I
consider quite some by myself to be science. So I find it funny that you
mi
Wow! This is quite surprising to me:
> 1 KCC Igo
> 2 Katsunari
> 3 Zen
> 4 Shikousakugo
> 5 Many Faces of Go
> 6 Erica
> 7 Kiseki
> 8 Galileo (upset Crazy Stone, due to a Chinese/Japanese rules mismatch)
> 9 Crazy Stone
> 10 Aya
There are so many programs stronger than Zen,
ManyFaces, CrazySto
I think it was a single elimination, not a swiss tournament, and I think
many of the strong programs were in the same bracket. I think Many Faces
lost to KCC in an early round and wasn't paired against the other strong
programs. We'll have to wait for the full results to check.
David
From
Yes, single elimination, so only the top spot is reliable. The Crazy
Stone upset definitely changed the character of the final match.
Here are the main brackets (again, any mistakes are my own):
KCC Igo + Aya
Many Faces + boon
Zen + Kerberos
Erica + Kinoa Igo
Katsunari + rock
Kiseki + nomitan
Official results of the second day:
KCC Igo 1
Katsunari 2
Zen 3
Shikosakugo 4
Many Faces of Go5
Erica 6
Kiseki 7
Galileo 8
Crazy Stone 9
Aya 10
GOGATAKI11
Rock12
Nomitan 13
Kinoa Igo 1
Official results of the second day:
KCC Igo 1
Katsunari 2
Zen 3
Shikosakugo 4
Many Faces of Go5
Erica 6
Kiseki 7
Galileo 8
Crazy Stone 9
Aya 10
GOGATAKI11
Rock12
Nomitan 13
Kinoa Igo 14
boon15
Ker
Woops. Sorry for double posting.
Hideki
--
g...@nue.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Kato)
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
David,
MFG lost by KCC at the second stage of the tournament,
and then won against Gallileo and Erica, obtaining the fifth position.
I admit that the most of the strong programs such as KCC, Aya, MFG, Zen
are assigned to the same right group, eliminating each other, and
in the left group, CrazySt
I'd like to thank all of the people who organized the UEC tournament for
providing machines and operators to allow Many Faces and others to
participate. I'd like to suggest that the UEC organizers consider using a
Swiss tournament system in the future since it gives a more accurate
assessment of p
14 matches
Mail list logo
