RE: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:03 +0100, Edward de Grijs wrote: > I do not want to start the rules/scoring discussion again, but I want > to know if the kgs-genmove_cleanup command which results in > playing inside your own territory, can be used with Japanese > rules/scoring. It seems to me that this co

RE: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-09 Thread Edward de Grijs
From: Aloril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Engine Supports kgs-genmove_cleanup and final_status_list: The engine will be queried as normal at the end of the game. If the engine disagrees with the stones that the opponent marks dead, then play will continue with the genmove requests replaced by kgs-genmov

RE: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Aloril
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:56 -0500, House, Jason J. wrote: > It's been a very long time since housebot got the final status list > wrong at the end of a game. I'll check with "ujh" who was running the > bots to see if we have a kgs log of what happened at the end of that > game. > By default

RE: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread House, Jason J.
> > My write-up of yesterday's KGS online computer Go tournament is now > > available, at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/22/index.html > > > > Congratulations to MoGoBot, undefeated winner of both divisions! > > > > Nick > > "HouseBot obtained a won position against IdiotBot. However > it d

Re: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Don Dailey
What I meant to say is that it's ok to NOT support the protocol and you would NEVER lose a game you should have won AS LONG AS your program makes sure to eat all the opponents dead groups before passing. Am I correct in this understanding? - Don On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:59 -0500, Don Dailey wr

Re: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Don Dailey
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:43 +, Nick Wedd wrote: > >I like the protocol, because you don't have to implement it, > >but if you don't you should clean up opponents dead stones before > >passing. > > I like it too. But bots which fail to support it will continue to > lose > games as a consequen

Re: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Nick Wedd
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Let me get this straight. I think you are saying that IdiotBot actually knew the stones were dead and correctly said so. But HouseBot didn't speak up for itself nor did it bother to capture the dead stones and the only way f

Re: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Don Dailey
Let me get this straight. I think you are saying that IdiotBot actually knew the stones were dead and correctly said so. But HouseBot didn't speak up for itself nor did it bother to capture the dead stones and the only way for the server to resolve this is to assume everything is alive. I th

Re: [computer-go] January KGS bot tournament results

2007-01-08 Thread Aloril
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:29 +, Nick Wedd wrote: > My write-up of yesterday's KGS online computer Go tournament is now > available, at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/22/index.html > > Congratulations to MoGoBot, undefeated winner of both divisions! > > Nick "HouseBot obtained a won positi