Let me get this straight. I think you are saying that IdiotBot actually knew the stones were dead and correctly said so. But HouseBot didn't speak up for itself nor did it bother to capture the dead stones and the only way for the server to resolve this is to assume everything is alive.
I think this is correct and how it should be done if I'm understanding it correctly I like the protocol, because you don't have to implement it, but if you don't you should clean up opponents dead stones before passing. - Don On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:11 +0200, Aloril wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:29 +0000, Nick Wedd wrote: > > My write-up of yesterday's KGS online computer Go tournament is now > > available, at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/22/index.html > > > > Congratulations to MoGoBot, undefeated winner of both divisions! > > > > Nick > > "HouseBot obtained a won position against IdiotBot. However it does not > implement the kgsGtp clean-up instruction, so IdiotBot was able to claim > that its dead stones were alive and win the game." > > IdiotBot seems OK in disputed position, from logfile: FINEST: Got > successful response to command "final_status_list dead": = N1 M11 C3 H10 > B1 M8 C9 N6 F13 A9 M2 A13 M4 > > Actually I think all stones are simply assumed alive after cleanup > phase. I think this is done by kgsGtp and bot has no control over this. > > >From log file: INFO: Cleanup mode has ended by passes. It will be > assumed that all dead stones > have already been removed. > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
