Stop searching excuses to buy a PSP3 :-P
On Thursday 04 January 2007 22:25, John Tromp wrote:
> Those of you looking to wring more performance out of your
> MonteCarlo Go programs might be interested in this article about
> installing Linux on the Sony PlayStation 3 and programming the
> 6 availab
/ security
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message
From: Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2007 7:43:37 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Cheap multiprocessing
Darren,
The 6 CPU's don't have to keep the tree - they only have to do
useful work.
Darren,
The 6 CPU's don't have to keep the tree - they only have to do
useful work. You could run a simulation on each of them.
The question is how much memory is available for the whole system
to run Linux and general purpose software on?
- Don
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:07 +0900, Darren Cook
PS3's main memory is, however, 256MB which seems not enough.
John Tromp: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>On 1/5/07, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The playstation multiprocessing looks very different: you get 1 general
>> purpose CPU and 6 specialized CPUs. Their key feature is they have 256K
>
On 1/5/07, Darren Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The playstation multiprocessing looks very different: you get 1 general
purpose CPU and 6 specialized CPUs. Their key feature is they have 256K
of local memory - this is not cache, it is all the memory they can
access. Not useful for UCT designs
Man, that Amazon thing sounds awesome. I wish I had an MC go program
of my own to try it out with.
On 1/4/07, Phil G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud might be cheaper @ $0.10 per instance-hour
consumed.
- Original Message
From: John Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED
>> Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud might be cheaper @ $0.10 per instance-hour
>> consumed.
>
> doesn't the 'amazing amazon elastic waistband' require you to write
> all of your code using windows-based hooks? that kind've turns me off.
You may be confusing with "Amazon Simple Storage Service" (w
> Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud might be cheaper @ $0.10 per instance-hour
> consumed.
doesn't the 'amazing amazon elastic waistband' require you to write
all of your code using windows-based hooks? that kind've
turns me off.
s.
__
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud might be cheaper @ $0.10 per instance-hour
consumed.
- Original Message
From: John Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2007 2:25:34 PM
Subject: [computer-go] Cheap multiprocessing
Those of you looking to wring more performa
