>
> And I'm now excited about possibly reusing the baduk.io's
> Docker infrastructure for the EGC2015 Computer Go tournament I'm
> planning, where bots will run on equal hardware too - it'd make the
> logistics quite easier for many competitors.
That's great to hear! If you need any help, let me
Very cool!
What I would like:
- a networked protocol so that you can also run them from your own
computer
- with clients that talk the usual gtp protocol
- the program interfacing between the server and the client-engine in
something like c/c++/python and open source so that one can more
easi
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:25:28AM +0100, Marc Landgraf wrote:
> I'm not convinced about that concept, tbh.
> People put a lot of work to optimize their bots, include GPU usage and
> figure out, how to use Pondering the best way. And then you want those
> programmers to remove those features and pu
I'm not convinced about that concept, tbh.
People put a lot of work to optimize their bots, include GPU usage and
figure out, how to use Pondering the best way. And then you want those
programmers to remove those features and put work into making their bots
run on your system, just to "level the pl
> Starting and stopping containers is so fast that I can afford to only start
> bots immediately after its opponent plays, request a single move, and
> terminate it.
Thats interesting. And impressive.
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer
/language is a requirement.
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
Chris LaRose
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:05 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] alternative for cgos
Thanks everyone for all the feedback! Sorry I hijacked the
Thanks everyone for all the feedback! Sorry I hijacked the thread!
There are definitely some big pros and cons to a hosted, containerized
environment for Go bots. I've replied to some comments below:
Won’t hosting limit your usability? With cgos I can build and immediately
> test on cgos on my d
If you can send me a binary that would be greatly appreciated. Trying
to build some anchors now.
-Josh
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Hideki Kato wrote:
> Shilver,
>
> I'll be able to run FatMan1, the anchor for 9x9, on my site, if
> necessary. Or, it's also possible to send you its binary a
Shilver,
I'll be able to run FatMan1, the anchor for 9x9, on my site, if
necessary. Or, it's also possible to send you its binary and password
so that you can run it on your site.
Hideki
Joshua Shriver:
:
>I'll try and get CGOS back online before this weekend. Technically it
>should be runn
I'll try and get CGOS back online before this weekend. Technically it
should be running now, but there were several issues. In order to use
it now you take the cgos client for your architecture and you have
to specify cgos.computergo.org manually since the binaries are
hardcoded to the old boa
I think hosted is a bad idea - anyone developing a bot has a computer
and a development environment, and it may not be linux, and the extra
step of updating and installing on the host is just sand in the gears.
And of course, hosting is not free.
___
Co
On Jan 13, 2015, at 4:52 AM, Woody Folsom wrote:
> I would be interested in participating, particularly as a containerized
> environment puts me on a more even footing with projects which have a lot
> more hardware to throw at the problem.
That’s an interesting setting for a tournament but not
t; *From:* Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Chris LaRose
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 5:35 PM
>> *To:* computer-go@computer-go.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Computer-go] alternative for cgos
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
&
:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Chris LaRose
> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 5:35 PM
> *To:* computer-go@computer-go.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Computer-go] alternative for cgos
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm actually working on something si
: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of
Chris LaRose
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 5:35 PM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] alternative for cgos
Hi,
I'm actually working on something similar at http://baduk.io. Right now, you
can log
Hi,
I'm actually working on something similar at http://baduk.io. Right now,
you can log in an play against a handful of bots over the web, but one day
I'd love to make it so you can add your own bots to let them compete
against the others. It's not quite ready for the public, but I'm working to
g
Hi,
I have the feeling that cgos won't come back in even the distant future
so I was wondering if there are any alternatives?
E.g. a server that constantly lets go engines play against each other
and then determines an elo rating for them.
Folkert van Heusden
--
Afraid of irssi? Scared of bitc
17 matches
Mail list logo