Will the new server handle small description strings about the bots?
It'd be great if we could provide/lookup basic data on bots. Example
data would be a homepage or a 1-2 sentence summary. For example "John
Smith's experimental Fuego 0.4 with heavy playout for reading semeai"
Sent from my
Yeah, it's a little roundabout, but like I said, I already have the tool. Plus, it can (and should) be run from a different machine. If you put something in
the client and the client is in your closet and loses power, it cannot phone home. Heartbeats solve that, but then you need something to m
Don has already indicated he would do something around listing clients
that are online.
However, monitoring the server to see if your client is online seems
very roundabout. I've been wanting to put e-mail notification in the
client anyway. This can either take the form of sending mails when t
A while back, I wrote a general purpose monitor tool that checks a specified URL for a specified RegEx and takes a specified action based on the result. The
action can be play a sound or send an email or flash the tray icon. Something like that might work (it would be much easier if the CGOS pag
That raises an interesting point. I've also put bots up in a setup and
forget scenario, but inevitably the bit is off of CGOS within a few
days and I had no idea when it went down.
What's the right way to solve this issue so such altruistic bots can
be more easilly maintained? This may also
Turn off Windows update or put the CGOS connect script in the startup folder
and set an automatic login.
David Fotland wrote:
I can have a reduced version of Many Faces up all the time on an old
computer, but I don't monitor it, so someone would have to email and remind
me when it goes down (u
I can have a reduced version of Many Faces up all the time on an old
computer, but I don't monitor it, so someone would have to email and remind
me when it goes down (usually because of a Microsoft automatic reboot :( )
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.or
On 9x9 I have been worrying of the lack of strong anchors but not
enough to complain about. What I think is more important is that
stronger programs are actually active on CGOS for longer periods of
time. I tried to contribute more by having versions of Valkyria online
with a fixed number o
2009/6/24 Christian Nentwich
> Don,
>
> you might have your work cut out if you try to control inflation directly,
> that can turn into a black art very quickly. Multiple anchors would be
> preferable. An offline, X * 1000 game playoff between gnugo and another
> candidate anchor would be enough
The discussion seems to be heading to a consensus: to use a single
program to anchor the rating system, and it is best to keep the
anchors that we currently use.
Additionally, we want a bunch of more-or-less fixed, more-or-less
standard programs that cover as wide a range as possible, and it is
id
10 matches
Mail list logo
