test plan for Tool subclasses

2012-04-12 Thread Steve Loughran
What's the best way to extend entry points that extend Tool? I've written a new entry point that lets you test topology scripts by loading them, resolving hostnames provided on the command line/in a file, then printing out the results to the console. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-82

Re: cmake

2012-05-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 May 2012 11:33, Radim Kolar wrote: > i have better experience with scons instead of cmake > mmm, may be better to jump beyond make altogether to the higher levels of nativeish build tools. What would be good is that the output can be parsed by jenkins & have that set up to build and test

Re: Getting address bind Exception when starting single node hadoop cluster

2012-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
1. This is a user question, so please use the common-user or mapreduce-user mailing lists. There are more people on it and it is the better place. 2. Before panicing and asking others for help, always try and do a bit of research. The stack trace says the cause is BindException and "Address alread

Re: plz help! HDFS to S3 copy issues

2012-07-11 Thread Steve Loughran
This is a hadoop-user q, not a development one -please use the right as user questions get ignored on the dev ones. also: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ConnectionRefused On 11 July 2012 19:23, Momina Khan wrote: > i use the following command to try to copy data from hdfs to my s3 bucket > > ubu

Re: Powered By Hadoop Wiki Page Permissions

2012-08-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 31 July 2012 05:46, Web wrote: > Hi > > Could I have the permission as well ? > My wiki username is "Denis". > > done

adding bin and net categories to JIRA/HADOOP

2012-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
There aren't bin and net categories in JIRA, yet often bugs go against the code there? Should I add them?

Re: adding bin and net categories to JIRA/HADOOP

2012-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
done. On 6 August 2012 13:45, Eli Collins wrote: > Works for me. I've been adding missing ones that make sense (eg webhdfs). > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > There aren't bin and net categories in JIRA, yet often bugs go

Re: Contributing to the Hadoop project

2012-08-08 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 August 2012 10:23, Clay McDonald wrote: > Hello all, I would like to know how I can assist with the Hadoop project? > It doesn't matter in what capacity. I just want to help out with whatever > is needed. > > One way that can benefit you and the source is to grab the alpha/beta releases and

Re: serializable writables - HADOOP-8619

2012-08-09 Thread Steve Loughran
ble for using cache on top of > writables. > > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/HADOOP-8619<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8619> > > can someone review this ticket and close it (as fixed or wont fix), i need > to know final decision. >

Re: serializable writables - HADOOP-8619

2012-08-09 Thread Steve Loughran
correction: i'd like a junit test that pushes some of the std writables to an ObjectOutputStream and back, verifies round-tripping of data. It may seem extra work -but it stops serialization breaking in future. -steve On 9 August 2012 09:11, Steve Loughran wrote: > I've voted for

Re: Adding hadoop usage

2012-08-11 Thread Steve Loughran
done On 11 August 2012 11:33, Aggelos Dimitratos wrote: > I would like to add our site rodacino <http://www.rodacino.gr> > We use hadoop for crawling news sites and log analysis. > We also use Apache Cassandra as our back end and Apache Lucene for > searching capabilit

Re: Cannot create a new Jira issue for MapReduce

2012-08-12 Thread Steve Loughran
On 12 August 2012 01:20, Jun Ping Du wrote: > Thanks Ted. Those are very good suggestions as backup solutions when JIRA > is down. > Besides alleviating the impact of JIRA downtime as you mentioned above, do > we think of some way to keep JIRA system highly available? It is a little > embarrassin

Re: Does anyone do related work on the log of hadoop?

2012-08-26 Thread Steve Loughran
What are you trying to log/analyse? I self-assigned to me "do better logging for machine analysis", a long time ago, but never sat down to do any of it -yet- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7466 On 23 August 2012 20:44, Li Shengmei wrote: > Hi, all > > I want to do some

Re: 答复: Does anyone do related work on the log of hadoop?

2012-08-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 29 August 2012 10:36, Li Shengmei wrote: > Hi, Steven, > Thank you very much. I just start to study the log analysis of > HADOOP. I will review your work carefully. > Btw, which part of hadoop source codes should be read carefully if I want > to get know the log record? > There's lot

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-09 Thread Steve Loughran
On 5 October 2012 18:27, Thilee Subramaniam wrote: > We at Quantcast have released QFS 1.0 (Quantcast File System) to open > source. This is based on the KFS 0.5 (Kosmos Distributed File System), > a C++ distributed filesystem implementation. KFS plugs into Apache > Hadoop via the 'kfs' shim that

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On 10 October 2012 16:03, Thilee Subramaniam wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Like Harsh said, HADOOP-8886 addresses removing KFS from apache tree. > > But I interpret your suggestion as 'moving qfs.jar out of apache tree, and > keeping the jar in possibly a maven repo externally. The new fs shim for > QFS

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Good point Steve. This touches on the larger issue of whether it > makes sense to host FS clients for other file systems in Hadoop > itself. I agree with what I think you're getting which is - if we can > handle the testing and integration via external dependencies it would > probably be better

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 11 October 2012 00:34, Thilee Subramaniam wrote: > > > My initial goal was to make Hadoop use QFS the same way it used KFS. Since > Hadoop branch-1 had lib/kfs.xx.jar, I was expecting to include a > qfs.x.x.jar in the Hadoop release; my first patch was to use such jar. But > now I see that Had

Re: [DISCUSS] remove packaging

2012-10-15 Thread Steve Loughran
+1, only creates confusion On 15 October 2012 19:00, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Bobby, > > That's correct, I mean the "packages" directories in common, hdfs, and > MR top-level directories, which contain the debs and RPMs. I'm not > opposed to someone re-working/contributing new code as long as t

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-26 Thread Steve Loughran
On 26 October 2012 01:24, Thilee Subramaniam wrote: > > We have made the changes recommended here, and made available a 'Hadoop > QFS jar' with QFS. This plugin and the QFS libraries will be maintained & > released by the QFS open-source project. > > Please see the download and usage instructions

Re: [PROPOSAL] 1.1.1 and 1.2.0 scheduling

2012-11-09 Thread Steve Loughran
letes. It allows other operations when the > deletion is in progress. (umamahesh via suresh) > > HDFS-4134. hadoop namenode and datanode entry points should return > negative exit code on bad arguments. (Steve Loughran via suresh) > > MAPREDUCE-4782. NLineInputFormat skips first line of last InputSplit > (Mark Fuhs via bobby) >

Re: need help submitting patches

2012-11-14 Thread Steve Loughran
don't worry about the patch fail message on jenkins as it currently only patches against trunk The standard development process for is -use Git, with git.apache.org the read-only repository -branch for each JIRA issue, trunk & branch-1 for the asf versions e.g https://github.com/steveloughran/h

Re: [PROPOSAL] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 November 2012 02:40, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > It seems like the trickiest issue is preservation of permissions and > symlinks in tar files. I suspect that any JVM-based solution like custom > Maven plugins, Groovy, or jtar would be limited in this respect. According > to Ant documentation

Re: [PROPOSAL] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 November 2012 19:15, Matt Foley wrote: > This discussion started in > > > Those of us involved in the branch-1-win port of Hadoop to Windows without > use of Cygwin, have faced the issue of frequent use of shell scripts > throughout the system, both in build time (eg, the utility > "saveVer

Re: commit access to hadoop

2012-11-24 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 November 2012 15:03, Radim Kolar wrote: > what it takes to gain commit access to hadoop? > good question. I've put some of my thoughts on the topic into a presentation I gave last month: http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/inside-hadoopdev That isn't so much about commit/non-commit status

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-25 Thread Steve Loughran
On 24 November 2012 20:13, Matt Foley wrote: > For discussion, please see previous thread "[PROPOSAL] introduce Python as > build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack". > > This vote consists of three separate items: > > 1. Contributors shall be allowed to use Pytho

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Release 1.1.1

2012-11-26 Thread Steve Loughran
On 20 November 2012 22:07, Matt Foley wrote: > Hello, > Hadoop-1.1.1-rc0 is now available for evaluation and vote: > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.1-rc0/ > or in the Nexus repository. > > The release notes are available at > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.1-rc0/re

Re: commit access to hadoop

2012-11-28 Thread Steve Loughran
On 26 November 2012 21:25, Radim Kolar wrote: > > The main "feature" is that when you get the +1 vote you yourself get to >> deal with the grunge work of apply >> patches to one or more svn branches, resyncing that with the git branches >> you inevitably do your own work on. >> > no, main featu

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 00:29, Radim Kolar wrote: > > * What else in the current build, besides saveVersion.sh, you see as > candidate to be migrated to Phyton? > > inline ant scripts > =0. Ant's versioning is stricter; you can pull down the exact Jar versions, and some of us in the Ant team worked

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 12:57, Luke Lu wrote: > I'd like to change my binding vote to -1, -0, -1. > > Considering the hadoop stack/ecosystem as a whole, I think the best cross > platform scripting language to adopt is jruby for following reasons: > > 1. HBase already adopted jruby for HBase shell, wh

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-12-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 1 December 2012 01:08, Eli Collins wrote: > -1, 0, -1 > > IIUC the only platform we plan to add support for that we can't easily > support today (w/o an emulation layer like cygwin) is Windows, and it > seems like making the bash scripts simpler and having parallel bat > files is IMO a better

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-12-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 13:40, Radim Kolar wrote: > > inline ant scripts >>> >>> =0. Ant's versioning is stricter; you can pull down the exact Jar >>> versions, >>> and some of us in the Ant team worked very hard to get it going >>> everywhere. >>> You don't gain anything by going to .py >>> >> ther

Re: SPEC files?

2012-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
The RPMs are being built with bigtop; grab it from here https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/rpm/hadoop I'm not sure which branch to use for hadoop-1.1.1; let me check that On 4 December 2012 17:24, Michael Johnson wrote: > Hello All, > > I've browsed the common-dev

Re: SPEC files?

2012-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
On 4 December 2012 18:51, Michael Johnson wrote: > On 12/04/2012 12:54 PM, Harsh J wrote: > >> The right branch is branch-0.3 for Bigtop. You can get more >> information upstream at Apache Bigtop itself >> (http://bigtop.apache.org). >> >> Branch 0.3 of the same URL Steve posted: >> https://githu

making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-14 Thread Steve Loughran
The swiftfs tests need only to run if there's a target filesystem; copying the s3/s3n tests, something like test.fs.swift.name swift://your-object-store-herel/ How does one actually go about making junit tests optional in mvn-land? Should the probe/skip logic be in the code -which c

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-17 Thread Steve Loughran
ke > AIX, etc. It seems to be a good tradeoff so far. I imagine that s3 > could do something similar. > > cheers, > Colin > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > The swiftfs tests need only to run if there's a target filesystem; >

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-17 Thread Steve Loughran
e not run That's overkill for adding a few more openstack tests -but I would like to make it easier to turn those and the rackspace ones without sticking my secrets into an XML file under SCM > Tom > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > thanks, I&

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 09:11, Colin McCabe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Colin McCabe > wrote: > > > > >> another tactic could be to have specific test projects: test-s3, > >> test-openstack, test-... which contain nothing but test cases. You'd set > >> jenkins up those test projects to

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 09:05, Colin McCabe wrote: > > I think the way to go is to have one XML file include another. > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";> > > boring.config.1 > boring-value > ... etc, etc... > > > > That way, you can keep the boring configuration under v

Re: wiki write permissions

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 15:00, Simone Leo wrote: > it looks like I don't have write permissions on the Hadoop wiki anymore > (account: SimoneLeo). I've given you access, ping me if it doesn't work -steve

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White wrote: > There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with "Test" (e.g. > Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which > start with "Test". Only those that start with "Test" are run > automatically (see the surefire configuration in > h

Re: Sorting user defined MR counters.

2013-01-02 Thread Steve Loughran
On 29 December 2012 23:32, Niels Basjes wrote: > Hi, > > I've had this 'itch' with Hadoop that it is hard to sort the counters in a > "nice" way. > Now the current trunk sorts the framework counters in such a way that they > follow the flow quite nicely. For the generic counters (i.e. user code >

can someone review HADOOP-9119?

2013-01-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Can someone look at HADOOP-9119 for me? It just adds more tests to the filesystem contract test base to assert that overwritten and deleted-then-recreated files have the semantics we expect -and diagnostics when the FS fails the tests. S3, SwiftFS and others benefit from these tests https://issues

Re: can someone review HADOOP-9119?

2013-01-02 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks, I'll deal with them On 2 January 2013 17:48, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I posted some comments on the jira. > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Steve Loughran >wrote: > > > Can someone look at HADOOP-9119 for me? It just adds more tests to the > &g

Re: Sorting user defined MR counters.

2013-01-08 Thread Steve Loughran
On 7 January 2013 15:57, Niels Basjes wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > Now for submitting changes for Hadoop: Is it desirable that I fix these > in > > > my change set or should I leave these as-is to avoid "obfuscating" the > > > changes that are relevant to the Jira at hand? > > > > > > > I recommend a

Re: development environment for hadoop core

2013-01-16 Thread Steve Loughran
My setup ( I work from home) # OS/X laptop w/ 30" monitor # FTTC broadband, 55Mbit/s down, 15+ up -it's the upload bandwidth that really helps development: http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_l/8050751551/ # IntelliJ IDEA IDE, settings edited for a 2GB Heap # Maven on the command line for builds #

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

2013-02-04 Thread Steve Loughran
I've been working on some stricter contract tests for filesystems, and have some changes for S3 and S3N that we've been working through. While this is mostly minor, rename(dir,dir/subdir) can lose all data in the source directory https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9261 I think that shou

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

2013-02-04 Thread Steve Loughran
disclaimer, personal opinions only, I just can't be bothered to subscribe with @apache.org right now. On 4 February 2013 14:36, Todd Lipcon wrote: > - Quality/completeness: for example, missing docs, buggy UIs, difficult > setup/install, etc > par for the course. Have you ever used Linux? > -

now that contrib has gone, where do we put code that isn't going into hadoop-common.jar?

2013-02-05 Thread Steve Loughran
I've got two homeless projects looking to get in to Hadoop 1. the branch-1 HA canary monitor, which can also monitor arbitrary services with an HTTP port, including declared dependencies on HDFS being live (no timeouts reporting to vsphere or Linux HA while HDFS is offline or in safe m

Re: timeout is now requested to be on all tests

2013-02-21 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks, just seen and commented on this. IF we're going to have test timeouts, we need a good recommended default value for all tests except the extra slow ones. Or 1. we just use our own JUnit fork that sets up a better default value than 0. I don't know how Ken would react to that. 2. we get ma

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
On 2 March 2013 03:33, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Windows is so different from _any_ Unix or pseudo-Unix flavors, including > Windows with Cygwin - that even multi-platform Java has hard hard time > dealing with it. This is enough, IMO, to warrant a separate checkpoint. > > Cygwin is the worst

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

2013-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
On 6 March 2013 23:17, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi, I got stuck in other work and did not make the Hadoop 1.2 branch in > February. > Now that release 1.1.2 is out, I'm ready to make the 1.2 branch. > > I intend to branch for 1.2 in the next night or two, and at that point will > make the formal propo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

2013-03-10 Thread Steve Loughran
l just have to commit to > > both branch-1 and branch-1.2. > > > > Thanks, > > --Matt > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Steve Loughran > >wrote: > > > > > On 6 March 2013 23:17, Matt Foley wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

2013-03-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 10 March 2013 18:32, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Steve, is there a timeline all these changes will be ready? If it is not > going to be > ready soon, perhaps these changes could be consider for 1.3? > > Suresh, I've put everything into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258 - the tests

Re: [VOTE] Plan to create release candidate Monday 3/18

2013-03-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 11 March 2013 03:38, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi all, > I have created branch-1.2 from branch-1, and propose to cut the first > release candidate for 1.2.0 on Monday 3/18 (a week from tomorrow), or as > soon thereafter as I can achieve a stable build. > > Between 1.1.2 and the current 1.2.0, there

Re: [VOTE] Plan to create release candidate for 0.23.7

2013-03-14 Thread Steve Loughran
On 13 March 2013 16:31, Thomas Graves wrote: > Hello all, > > I think enough critical bug fixes have went in to branch-0.23 that warrant > another release. I plan on creating a 0.23.7 release by the end March. > > Please vote '+1' to approve this plan. Voting will close on Wednesday > 3/20 at 10

Re: How to build hadoop code using ANT offline

2013-03-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 14 March 2013 17:06, Vikas Jadhav wrote: > for first job ANT download jar from internet > how to build offline using ANT > > -- ant needs all the dependencies. Once that first build is done, it will not need to do it again, as the stuff is cached in your disk somewhere

Re: how to define new InputFormat with streaming?

2013-03-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 March 2013 09:18, springring wrote: > Hi, > > my hadoop version is Hadoop 0.20.2-cdh3u3 and I want to define new > InputFormat in hadoop book , but there is error > "class org.apache.hadoop.streaming.WholeFileInputFormat not > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.InputFormat" > > Hadoop version i

Re: Reading partition for reducer

2013-04-01 Thread Steve Loughran
have you considered joining the u...@hadoop.apache.org and asking the question there? On 1 April 2013 17:38, Vikas Jadhav wrote: > Hi > > I want process/store all data pertaining to one reducer. > > i want store it in some data structure depending on key for example > > (0,ABC) > (0,TER) > (1,D

Re: Error in first build : Cannot run program "protoc": CreateProcess error=2

2013-04-03 Thread Steve Loughran
On 3 April 2013 15:46, Chandrashekhar Kotekar wrote: > Thanks a lot for your help. > > You were right. Problem was with Protoc version 1.5 only. I downloaded and > added protoc 1.4 version and now that error is gone. However now I am stuck > at this new error. Now maven is not able to find "msbuil

Re: Building Hadoop from source code

2013-04-08 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 April 2013 16:08, Mohammad Mustaqeem <3m.mustaq...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please, tell what I am doing wrong?? > Whats the problem?? > a lot of these seem to be network-related tests. You can turn off all the tests; look in BUILDING.TXT at the root of the source tree for the various operations,

Re: How to understand Hadoop source code ?

2013-04-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 April 2013 18:32, Noelle Jakusz (c) wrote: > +1 > > There are quite a few new people, so maybe start a collaborative group > where you can collect notes and steps (videos and articles). I know I would > have some for you that I have created as I have gotten started... it would > be a great

Re: How to understand Hadoop source code ?

2013-04-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 19 April 2013 23:08, Noelle Jakusz (c) wrote: > > > I have created an account (noellejakusz) and would like write access to > help with this... > > OK, you have write access

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 April 2013 14:00, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Hadoop devs, > > > This doc does not intend to propose new policies. The idea is to have one > document that outlines the various compatibility concerns (lots of areas > beyond API compatibility), captures the respective policies that exist, and >

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 April 2013 18:32, Eli Collins wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > > > > There's a separate issue that says "we make some guarantee that the > > behaviour of a interface remains consistent over versions", whi

Re: Hadoop Scheduling Algorithm

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 09:13, Chris Smith wrote: > And there is another scheduler, Dynamic Priority Scheduling, lurking in the > backwater of 0.21.0 that allows users to 'bid' for additional time. > Getting this back into current 1.x may be a great way to understand about > scheduling: > > > http://svn

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 09:00, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 22 April 2013 18:32, Eli Collins wrote: > >> >> > >> However if a change made FileSystem#close three times slower, this >> perhaps a smaller semantic change (eg doesn't change what exceptions >

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 11:32, Andrew Purtell wrote: > At the risk of hijacking this conversation a bit, what do you think of the > notion of moving interfaces like Seekable and PositionedReadable into a new > foundational Maven module, perhaps just for such interfaces that define and > tag support for

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting to Hadoop 2.X beta

2013-04-24 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 17:25, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Now that Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha is released I'd like > to open up a discussion on what practical steps > would it take for us as a community to get > Hadoop 2.X from alpha to beta? > > There's quite a few preconditions to be met for a piece

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

2013-04-29 Thread Steve Loughran
you need those patches to remove sun-specific bits in, don't you? On 25 April 2013 19:23, Amir Sanjar wrote: > Arun, thanks for the update. This is indeed the news we (IBM) have been > waiting for. Please let us know if there is anyway > we can help. > > Best Regards > Amir Sanjar > > System Man

Re: How to test patch

2013-04-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 29 April 2013 14:20, Amit Sela wrote: > Thanks for the reply Chris! > > I'm actually running on Fedora 17... I went ahead and changed to the > forrest & findbugs versions you recommended (the log file had an issue with > apache-forrest-0.8), and now when I look at the log and see a bunch of >

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

2013-04-30 Thread Steve Loughran
lead > IBM Senior Software Engineer > Phone# 512-286-8393 > Fax# 512-838-8858 > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Steve Loughran ---04/29/2013 05:40:33 > PM---you need those patches to remove sun-specific bits in, don]Steve > Loughran ---04/29/2013 05:40:33 PM--

Re: After Creating a patch what I need to do

2013-05-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 1 May 2013 06:33, Thoihen Maibam wrote: > Hi All, > > Can somebody help me after creating patch what I need to I do. I have seen > one subject 'How to test the patch' but that isn't really helping me. I am > stuck in the below areas. > > dev-support/test-patch can test your patch or you can c

Re: Issue HADOOP-8905

2013-05-09 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 May 2013 21:20, wrote: > Hi Harsh, > > Thanks for responding, > > I would be interested in what the dev group had in mind for this and I > also have a couple of additional queries ; > > I can see that a quick win for this would be to expose the existing Jetty > statistics metrics within the

Re: Issue HADOOP-8905

2013-05-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On 9 May 2013 20:39, wrote: > >> Unless there are existing bits of this stuff lurking somewhere in the >> Hadoop codebase that I haven't noticed, these could be copied into hadoop >> core. Reviewing the code as it is would be welcome >> >> https://github.com/**steveloughran/hadoop-trunk/** >> tre

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 10:57, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Folks, > > A considerable number of people have expressed confusion regarding the > recent vote on 2.0.5, beta status etc. given lack of specifics, the voting > itself (validity of the vote itself, whose votes are binding) etc. > > IMHO technical argum

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 15:02, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Roman, > > Furthermore, before we rush into finding flaws and scaring kids at night > it would be useful to remember one thing: > Software has *bugs*. We can't block any release till the entire universe > validates it, in fact they won't validate it if

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-16 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 23:19, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Guys, > > I guess what you're missing is that Bigtop isn't a testing framework for > Hadoop. It is stack framework that verifies that components are dealing > with > each other nicely. which to me means "Some form of integration test" > Every

Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote

2013-05-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 May 2013 23:47, Jagane Sundar wrote: > I see one significant benefit to having Release Plan votes: Fewer releases > with more members of the community working on any given release. > In turn, fewer Hadoop releases implies less confusion for end users > attempting to download and use an Apac

Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote

2013-05-22 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 (committer vote; not sure if it is binding on this or not)

Re: [DISCUSS] - Committing client code to 3rd Party FileSystems within Hadoop Common

2013-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
es, throttling of side-effecting operations, such as a recursive delete of a v. large directory. That remote testing, therefore, helps me find such pains before it hits the fueld. > You might also try asking Steve Loughran, since he did some great work > recently to try to nail down the exact sem

Re: [DISCUSS] Ensuring Consistent Behavior for Alternative Hadoop FileSystems + Workshop

2013-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
the operations within the Abstract FileSystem class > are a little ambiguous. With that said, we've joined Steve Loughran in > attempting to clarify these for both the Hadoop 1.0 and the Hadoop 2.0 > FileSystem class over at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9371 > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Hadoop Committers

2013-05-29 Thread Steve Loughran
congratulations! I propose you should celebrate your new rights by reviewing some of my outstanding patches, such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545 On 28 May 2013 23:07, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I'd like to announce the addition of a > few n

Re: Error in protobuf definitions

2013-05-30 Thread Steve Loughran
It's up as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4866 On 29 May 2013 21:53, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > Ralph, could you please file a Jira? We'll fix it. > > -Arpit > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > On line 228 of > > hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hd

Re: Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

2013-05-31 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 May 2013 22:14, Adam Kawa wrote: > Hi, > > When uploading new content (and information about my company), I got the > exception > "Sorry, can not save page because "rubbelloselotto.de" is not allowed in > this wiki." > > How could I solve it? > > Kind regards, > Adam > the word lotto may b

Re: Backwards compatibility of FileSystem interface.

2013-05-31 Thread Steve Loughran
; For context, here is a closely related JIRA > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Steve Loughran >wrote: > > > Jay, this is is more a commo

HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

2013-06-03 Thread Steve Loughran
a swift service, and how to test against them. If anyone does want to run the test themselves, try the docs and then escalate to us if there are any problems. Steve Loughran, Dmitry Mezhenskiy (Mirantis) & David Dobbins (Rackspace)

Re: HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

2013-06-03 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks On 3 June 2013 17:20, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Steve, I will review this. Might need a couple of days though. > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Steve Loughran >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We've got the HADOOP-8545< > > https://issues.a

Re: Developing cross-component patches post-split

2009-07-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Marcus Herou wrote: Hi. My 5 cents about svn:externals. I could not live without it but...I always tend to forget to update our svn:externals and about once a month I wonder why I accidentally released bleeding edge code in our production environent *smile* (should've written that auto-branching

Re: Developing cross-component patches post-split

2009-07-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Todd Lipcon wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: -1 to checking in jars. It's quite a bit of bloat in the repository (which admittedly affects the git.apache folks more than the svn folks), but it's also cumbersome to develop. It'd be nice to have a one-liner that bu

Re: Developing cross-component patches post-split

2009-07-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Todd Lipcon wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote: -1 for committing the jar. Most of the various options proposed sound certainly better. Can build.xml be updated such that Ivy fetches recent (nightly) build? This seems slightly better than actually committing the ja

Re: Developing cross-component patches post-split

2009-07-03 Thread Steve Loughran
Owen O'Malley wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Agree with Phillip here. Requiring a new jar to be checked in anywhere after every common commit seems unscalable and nonperformant. For git users this will make the repository size baloon like crazy (the jar is 400KB and we

Re: Hi

2009-07-23 Thread Steve Loughran
jayavardhan p wrote: Hi, This is jayavardhan.I'm new to this Hadoop.I went to develop a project on cloud computing.Can you suggest me in a proper way to develop this. Do you mean a university/student project?

Re: Contributing a New FileSystem Implementation - Questions About Process

2009-08-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Jonathan Seidman wrote: Thanks for the replies. We'll create a patch for trunk and then include a 0.18 compatible patch with the Jira, as you suggest. Based on other contributed FileSystem implementations, we were assuming this should go in o.a.h.fs and not contrib, so thanks for the clarificat

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 I plan to get my lifecycle patch up in sync with the forked code this week, passing tests, documentation in sync, etc, and it will be ready for review

Re: Contributing to HDFS - Distributed Computing

2009-09-01 Thread Steve Loughran
Hrishikesh Mantri wrote: Hi All. I am Masters student in CS . We are a group of two and are looking for adding some additional features to the HDFS as a part of the Distributed Computing course project . Can someone please provide us with pointers as in which direction we should take so that i

Re: different modes of inter process communication

2009-09-25 Thread Steve Loughran
Raghu Angadi wrote: A heartBeat is also an RPC. When you pause Namenode for 30 sec the datanode's heartbeat thread just waits for 30 sec for its heartbeat RPC to return. Note that when you pause Namenode, the RPCs to it don't fail immediately. During this wait, DNs can perform other transacti

Re: Towards Hadoop 1.0: Stronger API Compatibility from 0.21 onwards

2009-09-28 Thread Steve Loughran
Dhruba Borthakur wrote: It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between clients and servers running different versions of hadoop. The reason we would like this is because we can allow the same client (Hive, etc) submit jobs to two different clusters running different versions of hadoop. But

Re: conf.Configuration: java.io.IOException: config(config)

2009-11-19 Thread Steve Loughran
Rekha Joshi wrote: Hi Sonal, AFAIK,this exception mostly has no impact other than to indicate object creation.I agree Hadoop configuration class can be improved to handle it. if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) { LOG.debug(StringUtils.stringifyException (new IOException("config

Re: build and use hadoop-git

2010-01-25 Thread Steve Loughran
Kay Kay wrote: Start with hadoop-common to start building . hadoop-hdfs / hadoop-mapred pull the dependencies from apache snapshot repository that contains the nightlies of last successful builds so in theory all 3 could be built independently because of the respective snapshots being present

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >