let me do one quick merge of the current S3 one, if there's a problem pull tomW in and try to get this closed off. As it risks data I care about it
On 10 March 2013 18:32, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Steve, is there a timeline all these changes will be ready? If it is not > going to be > ready soon, perhaps these changes could be consider for 1.3? > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Matt Foley <mfo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > Steve, I'm okay with this, but > > HADOOP-9258<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258> is > > dependent on HADOOP-9265< > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9265>, > > which itself seems ready to commit. As I read the comments, both are > ready > > to commit. Please let me know if this is correct. > > > > In meantime, I'm going to make the branch. We'll just have to commit to > > both branch-1 and branch-1.2. > > > > Thanks, > > --Matt > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com > > >wrote: > > > > > On 6 March 2013 23:17, Matt Foley <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, I got stuck in other work and did not make the Hadoop 1.2 branch > in > > > > February. > > > > Now that release 1.1.2 is out, I'm ready to make the 1.2 branch. > > > > > > > > I intend to branch for 1.2 in the next night or two, and at that > point > > > will > > > > make the formal proposal > > > > to schedule an rc a week after that. If any issues, please let me > > know. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > --Matt > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to get my FS contract tests in there with the fixes for s3n > and > > s3 > > > to avoid data loss if you try to move a directory under itself. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9258 > > > > > > > > > -- > http://hortonworks.com/download/ >
