> On 9 Jan 2019, at 18:51, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I think we're a little late to the game to have this be
> much more than "what does AW have to do".
>
> The upcoming Yetus 0.9.0 release includes a pretty huge reworking of
> Yetus to make it work better in non-ASF settings; incl
Unfortunately I think we're a little late to the game to have this be
much more than "what does AW have to do".
The upcoming Yetus 0.9.0 release includes a pretty huge reworking of
Yetus to make it work better in non-ASF settings; including getting
the GitHub PR handling updated to work with proje
Cool, thanks!
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:28 PM Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
>
> > On 3 Jan 2019, at 01:22, lqjacklee wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steve, I like the style PR from the GitHub. when should we start
> to
> > change it ?
>
>
> Step 1 is having Yetus review github PRs associated with a JIRA. Withou
> On 3 Jan 2019, at 01:22, lqjacklee wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I like the style PR from the GitHub. when should we start to
> change it ?
Step 1 is having Yetus review github PRs associated with a JIRA. Without that
part of the process, we can't begin to use github for reviewing.
For a long
Thanks Steve, I like the style PR from the GitHub. when should we start to
change it ?
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:07 AM Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
> The new gitbox repo apparently does 2 way linking from github: you can
> commit a PR there and it'll make its way back
>
> this could be really slick -a
The new gitbox repo apparently does 2 way linking from github: you can commit a
PR there and it'll make its way back
this could be really slick -and do a big change to our review process.
Before we can go near it though, we need to get Yetus doing its review & test
of github PRs, which is no
