Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 November 2013 14:59, Robert Rati wrote: > Just to clarify, the tomcat/jasper updates and the jersey updates should > be able to go in without any jetty changes. OK > There is also a separate BZ for updating jetty to jetty 8, which is the > last jetty version that will run on java 6, if

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-11-21 Thread Robert Rati
Just to clarify, the tomcat/jasper updates and the jersey updates should be able to go in without any jetty changes. There is also a separate BZ for updating jetty to jetty 8, which is the last jetty version that will run on java 6, if there is a desire to update jetty without requiring java 7

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-11-13 Thread Steve Loughran
I've just been through some of these as part of my background project, "fix up the POMs" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9991. 1. I've applied the simple low/risk ones. 2. I've not done the bookkeeper one, as people working with that code need to play with it first. 3. I'

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-11-01 Thread Robert Rati
Bah, typos. Can those other patches be looked at and planned for inclusion into a release? Rob On 11/01/2013 10:57 AM, Robert Rati wrote: Putting the java 6 vs java 7 issue aside, what about the other patches to update dependencies? Can those be looked at an planned for inclusion into a rele

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-11-01 Thread Robert Rati
Putting the java 6 vs java 7 issue aside, what about the other patches to update dependencies? Can those be looked at an planned for inclusion into a releation? Rob On 10/31/2013 05:51 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm in agreement with Steve on this one. We're aware that Java 6 is EOL, but we can'

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-10-31 Thread Andrew Wang
I'm in agreement with Steve on this one. We're aware that Java 6 is EOL, but we can't drop support for the lifetime of the 2.x line since it's a (very) incompatible change. AFAIK a 3.x release fixing this isn't on any of our horizons yet. Best, Andrew On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Robert Rati

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-10-31 Thread Robert Rati
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5431 https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/HADOOP-9611

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-10-31 Thread Andre Kelpe
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> > that's not going to go in the 2.x branch. Java 6 is still a common platform > that people are using, because historically java7 (or any leading edge java > version) is buggy. Given the fact that Java 6 is end of life, this is becoming m

Re: Hadoop in Fedora updated to 2.2.0

2013-10-31 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 October 2013 18:43, Robert Rati wrote: > I've updated the version of Hadoop in Fedora 20 to 2.2.0. This means > Hadoop 2.2.0 will be the included in the official release of Fedora 20. > > Hadoop on Fedora is running against numerous updated dependencies, > including: > Java 7 (OpenJDK Iced