t;
>>>> On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light. The impact
>>>>> is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
>>>>> short-circuit
This is more than about bugs. In the past, incompatibilities are what bit us
more than bugs. If we find such bad incompatibilities in 2.7.0 release, calling
it "not-stable yet" (or "alpha" or whatever) leaves us with the ability to fix
any incompatibilities in a final "public-ready" release.
Th
gt; I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light. The impact
> >>>> is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
> >>>> short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
> >>>>
> >>>> best,
> >>>> Colin
>
;>> best,
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with
>>>>> Todd to get jcardar..
>>
7 AM, Colin P. McCabe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light. The impact
>>>>> is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
>>>>> short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
>>>>>
>&g
>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light. The impact
>>>>> is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will b
this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
>>>> short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with
>>>>> Todd to get jcardar..
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>&
7;t fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
>>>> short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Need Jcardar c
ed Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with
>>>> Todd to get jcardar..
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>>
>>>> From: Vinod Kumar Va
la
>>> ____________
>>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
>>>
32 ]..
>>>>>
>>>>> Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first
>>>>> release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to
>>>>> support Java 7 byte code..
>>>>>
>
>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> ____________
>>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apa
rdar..
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>
>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subj
> From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoo
-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder
changes that you are waiting on.
+Vinod
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula
wrote:
> H
Thanks for putting this together, Vinod.
Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
- The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't talk
to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.
I believe we should at least investigate
+1 (binding)Built the source from the tag and ran basic test on pseudo
distributed cluster.
Kihwal
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Sent: Frida
Done. Thank you, Tsuyoshi.
On 4/15/15 14:55, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
- Read doc
Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
> +0 (non-binding)
>
> - Downloaded source
> - Built from source
> - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
> - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
> - Looked Web UIs
>
>
+0 (non-binding)
- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
- Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
- Looked Web UIs
I found several issues to be fixed.
- HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI "Hadoop, 2014" is old
I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop
+1 (binding)
- Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum.
- Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows.
- Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster.
- Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs.
- Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a c
+1 (non-binding)
- Downloaded and built the source.
- Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and
Wordcount.
- Verified Signatures
- Verified the RM UI for correctness.
Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.
-Mit Desai
Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!
+Vinod
On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White wrote:
> +1 non-binding
> Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, no
> regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5% tolerance (dfsio,
> sort, amrestart, gmv3) and
op.apache.org;
> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
>
> Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against
> RC0.
>
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> wrote:
>
>>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,Vinod, for the time and effort you put into creating this release.
I downloaded and built the source for 2.7.0, RC0. I started a local cluster and
ran wordcount, sleep, and streaming jobs.
In addition, I did the following:
o I ran a distributed shell job which tested
#x27; information correctly
>
>Thanks,
>Zhijie
>
>From: Wangda Tan
>Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:25 PM
>To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
>Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>Subject: Re:
.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against
RC0.
On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
>
+1 (binding)
- Verified signatures and digests- Built from source with native support-
Deployed to a single-node cluster and ran sample jobs
Jason
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.
+1 non-binding
Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, no
regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5% tolerance (dfsio, sort,
amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale, compression, shuffle) appear to
have improvements.
Disclaimer, please note a
Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against
RC0.
On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
>
> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.
+1 (binding)
downloaded the source tar ball, built it, and ran some examples and distcp
job.
Thanks,
-Jing
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Robert Kanter
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> + verified checksum
> + Deployed binary tarball, ran some examples, clicked around in the Web UIs
>
> thanks
+1 (non-binding)
+ verified checksum
+ Deployed binary tarball, ran some examples, clicked around in the Web UIs
thanks
- Robert
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Masatake Iwasaki <
iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> + verified signature and mds of source and binary tarb
+1 (non-binding)
+ verified signature and mds of source and binary tarball
+ built from source tarball
+ deployed binary tarball to 3 nodes cluster and run some
hadoop-mapreduce-examples jobs
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 4/11/15 08:44, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a re
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums on source and binary tar ball.
- Built from source and launched single cluster.
- Checked to launch some jobs successfully.
- Killing application via RM UI.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Junping Du wrote:
> +1. (Non-binding)
> - Downlo
+1 non-binding
build from source,
deploy to a single node cluster, run wordcount, Terasort, etc.
Also run Teragen using DockerContainerExecutor, works fine.
Regards!
Chen He
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Junping Du wrote:
> +1. (Non-binding)
> - Download and verify the checksum on src and
+1. (Non-binding)
- Download hadoop-2.7.0-RC0-src.tar.gz and build locally.
- Deploy a single node cluster and run some quota related hdfs/hadoop
shell commands.
- Run sample MR jobs.
All basic tests result looks good to me.
Thanks,
Xiaoyu
On 4/13/15, 5:43 AM, "Junping Du" wrote:
>+1. (No
+1. (Non-binding)
- Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally.
- Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI, Terasort,
etc.
All looks fine for now.
Thanks,
Junping
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Saturday, Apr
+1(non-binding)
Build from source,
Deployed in 3 Node cluster
Verified RM HA, RM Work preserving restart and NM restart features submitting
simple MR Jobs
And basic sanity testing is done.
Thanks & Regards
Rohith Sharma K S
-Original Message-
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vino
+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli"
mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: r
ks,
Zhijie
From: Wangda Tan
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:25 PM
To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
+1 (Non-bindi
+1 (Non-binding)
Built from src, deployed a single node cluster, and tried to run some MR
jobs.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~vi
42 matches
Mail list logo
