Hi Vinod,

Could you check a comment by Karthik? Maybe you're missing it.

> Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
> - The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't talk
> to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.
>
> I believe we should at least investigate this further to see what could
> have been going on.

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'd like to agree with Vinod's suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> - Tsuyoshi
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
>>
>> Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
>>
>> Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
>> strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
>> following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
>> with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
>>> is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
>>> short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
>>>
>>> best,
>>> Colin
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
>>> <brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
>>>> Todd to get jcardar..
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
>>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
>>>>
>>>> Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
>>>>
>>>> So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
>>>> changes that you are waiting on.
>>>>
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
>>>> <brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HI Allen
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
>>>>>
>>>>> Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
>>>>> release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
>>>>> support Java 7 byte code..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
>>>>> 2.7.0-RC0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards
>>>>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
>>>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
>>>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
>>>>> against RC0.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The RC is available at: 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed before
>>>>>> - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
>>>>>> - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
>>>>>> how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
>>>>>> weeks as the stable release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Vinod
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to