Hi,
I'm not a Hadoop expert but I've had some experiences in the cloud
infrastructure that I think also makes sense in your case.
For 2.x client + 3.x Server case, the Server side can obviously provide
compatibility, so it should work fine. But in the opposite case,
it might have problem, because
Thanks for doing this, I was going to post in the JIRA about this yesterday
but was disturbed by something,
please help us migrate the ARM nodes.
BR,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:40 AM Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:00 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote:
>
> > +CC: common-dev@hado
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Tested on ARM platform for the following actions:
+ Built from source on Ubuntu 18.04, OpenJDK 8
+ Deployed a pseudo cluster
+ Ran some example jobs(grep, wordcount, pi)
+ Ran teragen/terasort/teravalidate
+ Ran TestDFSIO job
BR,
Z
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhenyu Zheng resolved HADOOP-16766.
---
Resolution: Invalid
> Increase timeout for RPCCallBenckmark.testBenchmarkWithPr
Zhenyu Zheng created HADOOP-16766:
-
Summary: Increase timeout for
RPCCallBenckmarik.testBenchmarkWithProto()
Key: HADOOP-16766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16766
Project: Hadoop
it's better to make @Chris Thistlethwaite
> know
> this email. Could you please give some kind advices? Thank you.
>
> BR
>
> ZhaoBo
>
>
>
> [image: Mailtrack]
> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&
Hi Hadoop,
First off, I want to thanks to Wei-Chiu for having me on the last week's
Hadoop community sync to introduce our ideas of ARM support on Hadoop. And
also for all the attendees for listening and providing suggestions.
I want to provide some update on the status:
1. Our teammate has
if we can make use
>>> > of org.xolstice.maven.plugins:protobuf-maven-plugin, our upgrade to
>>> 3.0.0
>>> > of protobuf will also be more easier.
>>> >
>>> > However i think its better to do this effort in trunk itself.
>>> > In of
protobuf-maven-plugin, our upgrade to
>>> 3.0.0
>>> > of protobuf will also be more easier.
>>> >
>>> > However i think its better to do this effort in trunk itself.
>>> > In offline talks, few members were interested to start 3.3.0 r
and work against us.
> >>
> >> If we work off the Hadoop version 3 — and assume that we have "shading"
> in
> >> place for all deployments; it might be possible to get there; still a
> >> daunting task.
> >>
> >> So best of luck with t
Hi,
Thanks Vinaya for bring this up and thanks Sheng for the idea. A separate
branch with it's own ARM CI seems a really good idea.
By doing this we won't break any of the undergoing development in trunk and
a CI can be a very good way to show what are the
current problems and what have been fixed
Or according to the BUILDING.txt in hadoop repo, protobuf-compiler is
installed and also according to
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=protobuf-compiler&searchon=names
the
version is 3.0
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:59 PM Szilard Nemeth
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All hadoop-trunk builds are failing
Hi,
I'm quite new to hadoop and not very sure whether it is correct or not. By
checking the latest successful build log:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/lastSuccessfulBuild/consoleFull
it seems the os version is ubuntu 14.04 and in the later failling jobs, the
os version is 18.0
Hi,
I'm quite new to hadoop and not very sure whether it is correct or not. By
checking the latest successful build log:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/lastSuccessfulBuild/consoleFull
it seems the os version is ubuntu 14.04 and in the later failling jobs, the
os version is 18.0
Hi, I'm quite interested in this, any updates on event details?
BR
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:29 AM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Thanks Junping for organizing the event. Looking forward to the coming
> meetup.
>
> BTW, It is hoped to keep running regular Hadoop Contributors Meetups in
> China.
>
> On F
Hi Hadoop:
I was trying to build Hadoop on AArch64 platform recently, and I've
encontered some issues, one of them is about protobuf 2.5.0, the lowest
version of protobuf can be provided on AArch64 is 2.6.1 and that causes
version mismatch error when try to build Hadoop as hadoop requires 2.5.0, I
Hi Hadoop,
Some of you might see the related proposal in JIRA(
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16358) already, but I want to
raise it to a wider audience and clarify some potential misunderstandings.
I’m from OpenLab team(https://openlabtesting.org/ ,a community to do open
source
Zhenyu Zheng created HADOOP-16358:
-
Summary: Add an ARM CI for Hadoop
Key: HADOOP-16358
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16358
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue Type: Improvement
18 matches
Mail list logo
