xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #15636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15636
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
chirping78 commented on code in PR #15636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15636#discussion_r1926247271
##
arch/xtensa/include/esp32/irq.h:
##
@@ -495,6 +495,23 @@ static inline_function int esp32_irq_gpio(int cpu)
#endif
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_MULTICPU
R
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #15636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15636#discussion_r1924809988
##
arch/xtensa/include/esp32/irq.h:
##
@@ -495,6 +495,23 @@ static inline_function int esp32_irq_gpio(int cpu)
#endif
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_MULTIC
nuttxpr commented on PR #15636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15636#issuecomment-2606232851
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, al
chirping78 opened a new pull request, #15636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15636
## Summary
Currently `up_cpu_index` of xtensa arch is a non-inline function, which
means it will be called by `callX` instruction, and it will cause stack
push/pop operations.
And fro
