xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
lupyuen commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2710118218
@nuttxpr test qemu-armv8a:netnsh
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
jlaitine commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2703199570
Adding one example with real numbers how the timer drift causes the tick
timer & watchdog timers to fail:
Example:
Counter frequency 2400 (24MHz)
Tick frequency 100 H
Fix-Point commented on code in PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#discussion_r1986948744
##
arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_arch_timer.c:
##
@@ -265,34 +269,20 @@ static int arm64_tick_start(struct oneshot_lowerhalf_s
*lower,
{
struct arm64_oneshot_lower
nuttxpr commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2710131879
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+15779&type=issues)
Build and Test Successful (qemu-armv8a:netnsh)
https://gitla
jlaitine commented on code in PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#discussion_r1984624911
##
arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_arch_timer.c:
##
@@ -265,34 +269,20 @@ static int arm64_tick_start(struct oneshot_lowerhalf_s
*lower,
{
struct arm64_oneshot_lowerh
jlaitine commented on code in PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#discussion_r1984620387
##
arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_arch_timer.c:
##
@@ -265,34 +269,20 @@ static int arm64_tick_start(struct oneshot_lowerhalf_s
*lower,
{
struct arm64_oneshot_lowerh
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#discussion_r1984406298
##
arch/arm64/src/common/arm64_arch_timer.c:
##
@@ -265,34 +269,20 @@ static int arm64_tick_start(struct oneshot_lowerhalf_s
*lower,
{
struct arm64_oneshot
jlaitine commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2703630963
> Regarding the problem you described, the original implementation of
aligning the tick scale also has this problem. Let's take an example. Assume
that the frequency is `6250`, `
Fix-Point commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2703593592
> Adding one example with real numbers how the timer drift causes the tick
timer & watchdog timers to fail:
>
> Example:
>
> Counter frequency 2400 (24MHz) Tick frequen
jlaitine commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2702997333
Could you please wait with this a bit, we'd like to test it on i.MX93
platform before merging. I will come back to this still today.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
nuttxpr commented on PR #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938#issuecomment-2696110823
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX r
Fix-Point opened a new pull request, #15938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15938
## Summary
- Optimized the initialization process of percpu timer
- Fixed the time drift problem caused by integer division precision loss
when USEC_PER_TICKS is set to a low value
#
13 matches
Mail list logo
