Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-30 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #2921: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2921 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-29 Thread via GitHub
nuttxpr commented on PR #2921: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2921#issuecomment-2564792404 [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requiremen

[PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-29 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea opened a new pull request, #2921: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2921 ## Summary Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation. ## Impact SBOM ## Te

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-18 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-18 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#issuecomment-2552525596 @xiaoxiang781216 ready to go -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-18 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#discussion_r1890371951 ## builtin/builtin_list.c: ## @@ -41,11 +46,8 @@ * Public Data / -#include

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-18 Thread via GitHub
cederom commented on code in PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#discussion_r1890280301 ## builtin/builtin_list.c: ## Review Comment: code change, potential build error cause. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-18 Thread via GitHub
cederom commented on PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#issuecomment-2551375599 build errors come from previously merged pr? o_O -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-17 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#issuecomment-2550589369 @xiaoxiang781216 please ignore can nxerrors -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to g

Re: [PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-17 Thread via GitHub
nuttxpr commented on PR #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899#issuecomment-2550489733 [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR description does not meet the NuttX requ

[PR] apps: migrate to SPDX identifier [nuttx-apps]

2024-12-17 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea opened a new pull request, #2899: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2899 ## Summary Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation. ## Impact SBOM ## Testing