(nuttx) branch master updated: sched/spin_lock: continue work to rename raw_spin* to spin_*_notrace

2025-02-26 Thread pussuw
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. pussuw pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 52a13a8351 sched/spin_lock: continue work to rena

Re: [PR] sched/spin_lock: continue work to rename raw_spin* to spin_*_notrace [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
pussuw merged PR #15862: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15862 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apach

Re: [PR] libc/elf: rename modlib to elf [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
anchao commented on PR #15765: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765#issuecomment-2686611524 I'm not saying that the structure of Linux must be correct. However, I think that @gregory-nutt and Linus had similar ideas in the initial design. Compared with the kernels implements of

Re: [PR] libc/elf: rename modlib to elf [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
anchao commented on PR #15765: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765#issuecomment-2686602047 > I know about the implementation duplication before, libelf and modlib were about the same. However, will we have a need to "re-introduce" modlib, if it gets capability to load modules ot

Re: [PR] sched/spin_lock: continue work to rename raw_spin* to spin_*_notrace [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
anchao commented on PR #15862: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15862#issuecomment-2686588301 > It has been a while since I looked into the spinlock APIs, so the old postfix `_wo_note `is now just `_notrace `? Yes,just similar to the naming style in the Linux kernel: https

(nuttx-website) branch asf-site updated: Publishing web: 405a7126bab3fbbeef1bb95fabd1561c86029fc1 docs: aa5d119bc3810f0f664e397a0b8385f6099b95e4

2025-02-26 Thread github-bot
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push: new 86f1af84a Publishing web: 405a712

Re: [PR] Documentation: add cyclictest benchmark utility documentation [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
zdebanos commented on PR #15913: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913#issuecomment-2686431544 Commit message updated! Thank you all for a review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [PR] pwm: add support for PWMIOC_FAULTS_FETCH_AND_CLEAR ioctl [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
ppisa commented on PR #15912: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15912#issuecomment-2686359468 I agree with implementation. Thank for the enhancement. I ping @zdebanos , he would have use for IOCTL as well on SaMoCon. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] Documentation: add cyclictest benchmark utility documentation [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
lupyuen commented on PR #15913: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913#issuecomment-2686341309 @zdebanos Could you fill in the Commit Description? Thanks :-) - https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913/commits/f2ecbbd7a5f9310aa0260fdb66175352542b8125 -- This is an automated m

Re: [PR] The placement of cases under testing is a bit messy, and cases of the same type need to be merged [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
cederom commented on PR #2931: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2931#issuecomment-2686213322 Okay getting back to discussion in the original test reorganization thread: * We just got PR https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3011 which moves `apps/testing/testsuites/kerne

Re: [PR] testing: move cmocka_fs to the new folder /basic [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
cederom commented on PR #3011: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3011#issuecomment-2686187024 Build failed, restarted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific co

Re: [PR] Documentation: add cyclictest benchmark utility documentation [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
nuttxpr commented on PR #15913: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913#issuecomment-2686048467 [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes. The PR appears to meet the requirements, although

Re: [PR] benchmarks/cyclictest: the rt-tests cyclictest NuttX Port [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
zdebanos commented on PR #3000: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3000#issuecomment-2686045791 I've managed to prepare the documentation for the cyclictest utility, I've created a [pull request here](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913). Concerning the semaphore systemti

[PR] Documentation: add cyclictest benchmark utility documentation [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
zdebanos opened a new pull request, #15913: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15913 Adding cyclictest documentation. This concerns [this pull request](https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3000) in nuttx-apps. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

Re: [I] [HELP] STM32H7 and SDMMC Driver Leaves DPSM Active After CMD6 [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
bkempers commented on issue #15909: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15909#issuecomment-2685908304 Had a different version of NuttX that didn't incorporate patch [643e34efde977a5b660d5648d9f503fccc0dbcd0](https://github.com/PX4/NuttX/commit/643e34efde977a5b660d5648d9f503fccc0dbcd0

(nuttx) branch master updated: arch/arm64: fix boot stage prints with CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_PRINT=y

2025-02-26 Thread pussuw
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. pussuw pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new aa5d119bc3 arch/arm64: fix boot stage prints with

Re: [PR] arch/arm64: fix boot stage prints with CONFIG_ARCH_EARLY_PRINT=y [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
pussuw merged PR #15901: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15901 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apach

Re: [I] [HELP] STM32H7 and SDMMC Driver Leaves DPSM Active After CMD6 [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
bkempers closed issue #15909: [HELP] STM32H7 and SDMMC Driver Leaves DPSM Active After CMD6 URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15909 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

Re: [PR] libc/elf: rename modlib to elf [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
pussuw commented on PR #15765: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765#issuecomment-2685782557 I know about the implementation duplication before, libelf and modlib were about the same. However, will we have a need to "re-introduce" modlib, if it gets capability to load modules othe

Re: [PR] sched/spin_lock: continue work to rename raw_spin* to spin_*_notrace [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
pussuw commented on PR #15862: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15862#issuecomment-2685774694 It has been a while since I looked into the spinlock APIs, so the old postfix `_wo_note `is now just `_notrace `? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] libc/elf: rename modlib to elf [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #2985: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2985#issuecomment-2685524162 @anchao could you please verify, it is failing in the CI -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the UR

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea merged PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apa

Re: [I] PWM driver refactorization? [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
michallenc commented on issue #12381: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/12381#issuecomment-2685455271 Related: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15912 implementing fault clear IOCTL. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pleas

Re: [PR] pwm: add support for PWMIOC_FAULTS_FETCH_AND_CLEAR ioctl [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
michallenc commented on PR #15912: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15912#issuecomment-2685449903 @raiden00pl Hi, what do you think? I know it may not be the best time for it because of possible future PWM API rewrite, but it is completely separated from characteristics set, so it

[PR] pwm: add support for PWMIOC_FAULTS_FETCH_AND_CLEAR ioctl [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
michallenc opened a new pull request, #15912: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15912 ## Summary This ioctl clears the active fault inputs. Some faults can be latched (still active even if the source is not active anymore), so they have to be cleared from the software. The ar

(nuttx) 03/06: documentation/esp32[c3|c6|h2]: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 7658c39304f76a2c73d121da38b8c643676510a5 Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:32:38 2025 +0100 documen

(nuttx) 04/06: arch/xtensa/esp32[s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 4d89d7186ed405aab67de8f1dc83a1465b78c4d7 Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:47:05 2025 +0100 arch/xt

(nuttx) 05/06: boards/xtensa/esp32[s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 06ef4a8084aaedec63f2df65940cd9c9a940922c Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:18:51 2025 +0100 boards/

(nuttx) 06/06: documentation/esp32[s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit c7702894fe85cf99505d792ffa15bd7f16964701 Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:16:52 2025 +0100 documen

(nuttx) 02/06: boards/risc-v/esp32[c3|c6|h2]: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 939b31b97efee54dbe7e9dac09a89a7100aa2bec Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:33:02 2025 +0100 boards/

(nuttx) 01/06: arch/risc-v/espressif: Add I2C slave support

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 59fe35070814ac4eb8f9ee1bbf4bdc5eaba12c81 Author: Eren Terzioglu AuthorDate: Wed Feb 26 09:33:25 2025 +0100 arch/ri

(nuttx) branch master updated (8ab87c582b -> c7702894fe)

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git from 8ab87c582b arch/mcx-nxxx: Add GPIO interrupt support new 59fe350708 arch/risc-v/espressif: Add I2C slave support

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906#issuecomment-2685422608 > > > > please separate documentation, arch and board changes in separate commits > > > > > > > > > We can seperate documentation but why we should seperate board and arch cha

Re: [PR] testing: move cmocka_fs to the new folder /basic [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
nuttxpr commented on PR #3011: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3011#issuecomment-2685396578 [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requiremen

[PR] testing: move cmocka_fs to the new folder /basic [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
txy-21 opened a new pull request, #3011: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3011 ## Summary testing: move cmocka_fs to the new folder /basic Move the cmocka case folder under testsuites to testing/fs/basic ## Impact apps/testing/testsuites and apps/testing/fs/

Re: [PR] Add more I/O options for brickmatch example [nuttx-apps]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis merged PR #3010: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3010 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.a

(nuttx-apps) branch master updated (0da270d9d -> 8fcff3e88)

2025-02-26 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-apps.git from 0da270d9d system/debugpoint: fix bug the length option parsing error add 9c7e29809 games/brickmatch: Add GPI

Re: [PR] Docs/brickmatch: Update brickmatch game docs [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on code in PR #15905: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15905#discussion_r1971694781 ## Documentation/platforms/xtensa/esp32/boards/esp32-devkitc/index.rst: ## @@ -279,6 +279,18 @@ You can check that the sensor is working by using the ``sensortest`` ap

Re: [I] [HELP] STM32H7 and SDMMC Driver Leaves DPSM Active After CMD6 [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #15909: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15909#issuecomment-2684989500 Hi @bkempers I was referring to the official specification, I need to find it in my computer, but a quick search I found this similar Document: https://academy.cba.mit.edu/classes/ne

Re: [PR] xtensa: initial support for debugpoint api [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #15907: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15907#issuecomment-2684961179 @chirping78 @tmedicci does it require updating the Documentation/ ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us

Re: [I] [DRUNX] Distributed Runtime and bUild for NuttX Test Environment [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
fdcavalcanti commented on issue #15730: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15730#issuecomment-2684947098 Testing NSH makes sense from a sanity test stand point. Building NSH should be treated as a smoke test: can't even build it, go back to development. Then, a next step is running

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906#issuecomment-2684941367 > > > please separate documentation, arch and board changes in separate commits > > > > > > We can seperate documentation but why we should seperate board and arch changes? Whe

(nuttx) 03/03: arch/mcx-nxxx: Add GPIO interrupt support

2025-02-26 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 8ab87c582b6ee5fdcb59f45211bead852d0bf768 Author: Ville Juven AuthorDate: Tue Feb 25 15:46:09 2025 +0200 arch/mcx-nx

(nuttx) branch master updated (fcff16a0a8 -> 8ab87c582b)

2025-02-26 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git from fcff16a0a8 arch/risc-v: Add ARCH_HAVE_RAMFUNCS to ESP32-C6 and ESP32-H2 new 1d57ed7807 arch/mcx-nxxx: Add GPIO po

(nuttx) 02/03: arch/mcx-nxxx: Enable GPIO clocks.

2025-02-26 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit d7811c4b6ea68c6ed749a16924af1d98d75a73c2 Author: Ville Juven AuthorDate: Tue Feb 25 15:49:26 2025 +0200 arch/mcx-nx

Re: [PR] arch/mcx-nxxx: Add GPIO interrupt support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
acassis merged PR #15908: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15908 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apac

(nuttx) 01/03: arch/mcx-nxxx: Add GPIO port 0

2025-02-26 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git commit 1d57ed780710cbc4646e4b543e9a36aac576c890 Author: Ville Juven AuthorDate: Tue Feb 25 15:45:30 2025 +0200 arch/mcx-nx

Re: [PR] drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x: Initial standalone sx126x driver [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #15795: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#issuecomment-2684816062 > I believe that should do it. The first line in commit message should be title from what i have seen. Correct me if i'm wrong. it looks good ! Thanks for correcting the commits

Re: [PR] drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x: Initial standalone sx126x driver [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
keever50 commented on PR #15795: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#issuecomment-2684569639 I believe that should do it. The first line in commit message should be title from what i have seen. Correct me if i'm wrong. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic

Re: [PR] drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x: Initial standalone sx126x driver [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
keever50 commented on PR #15795: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#issuecomment-2684383394 Done that. Thank you for being patient. I'm learning a lot and starting to understand how NuttX works. It is an amazing RTOS. I'm happy to be able to contribute to it. -- Thi

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906#issuecomment-2684382793 > Thanks @acassis, @jerpelea. Updated. Hi please follow the commit naming convention ex: documentation:esp32[s2|s3]: Add I2C Slave support arch/xtensa/espressif: Add

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
eren-terzioglu commented on PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906#issuecomment-2684378446 Thanks @acassis, @jerpelea. Updated. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [PR] esp32[c3|c6|h2|s2|s3]: Add I2C slave support [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea commented on PR #15906: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15906#issuecomment-2684337447 > > please separate documentation, arch and board changes in separate commits > > We can seperate documentation but why we should seperate board and arch changes? When we add some

(nuttx) branch master updated (98b9cc25ef -> fcff16a0a8)

2025-02-26 Thread jerpelea
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jerpelea pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git from 98b9cc25ef Documentation/ra4m1: Add documentation for Renesas RA4M1 MCU and arduino-r4-minima add fcff16a0a8 ar

Re: [PR] arch/risc-v: Add ARCH_HAVE_RAMFUNCS to ESP32-C6 and ESP32-H2 [nuttx]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
jerpelea merged PR #15910: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15910 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apa