Colin Howarth wrote:
I posted a couple of little screen shots (which compressed nicely
to 16k and 30k or so) to the quartz-dev list.
I got an automated reply that they're awaiting moderator approval
(for having gone over 20k).
Probably, if and when the images are posted, someone will say,
On 8 Oct, 2009, at 01:19, Greg Guerin wrote:
Colin Howarth wrote:
I don't know enough about what Quartz is doing. For instance, does
it calculate the coverage
of a pixel (i.e. the fraction covered) as a float and then use that
times 255 for pixel values
(for black on white) giving 256 steps
Colin Howarth wrote:
I don't know enough about what Quartz is doing. For instance, does
it calculate the coverage
of a pixel (i.e. the fraction covered) as a float and then use that
times 255 for pixel values
(for black on white) giving 256 steps. Or does it quantize down to
16 steps, for e
On 7 Oct, 2009, at 23:13, Dave Keck wrote:
Try applying a 0.25 or 0.5 pixel shadow that's the same color as
whatever you're drawing. (This technique has worked very well for me
in the past for getting a smoother look.)
I'll give it a go. In fact eventually I'll end up calculating what the
va
Try applying a 0.25 or 0.5 pixel shadow that's the same color as
whatever you're drawing. (This technique has worked very well for me
in the past for getting a smoother look.)
Also, I've found that offsetting my drawing code by fractions of
pixels can help, but usually in the opposite case where I
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Colin Howarth wrote:
> On 7 Oct, 2009, at 22:19, Alastair Houghton wrote:
>
>> On 7 Oct 2009, at 21:11, Colin Howarth wrote:
>>
>> I'm surprised that the output on screen doesn't look better.
>>>
>>
>> Usually Quartz does an extremely good job...
>>
>
> I know. Th
On 7 Oct, 2009, at 22:19, Alastair Houghton wrote:
On 7 Oct 2009, at 21:11, Colin Howarth wrote:
I'm surprised that the output on screen doesn't look better.
Usually Quartz does an extremely good job...
I know. That's why I'm confused.
Are there any other settings I can adjust with regard
On 7 Oct 2009, at 21:11, Colin Howarth wrote:
I'm surprised that the output on screen doesn't look better.
Usually Quartz does an extremely good job...
Are there any other settings I can adjust with regard to the anti-
aliasing? (Not talking about flatness of Bezier curves here). Is
this p
