> On Jul 1, 2016, at 15:22 , Quincey Morris
> wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 13:58 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>>
>> Am I missing something, or is it really as broken as it sounds?
>
> I don’t think you’re missing anything, but “broken” isn’t quite the right
> word.
What's broken is that macOS
On Jul 1, 2016, at 13:58 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
> Am I missing something, or is it really as broken as it sounds?
I don’t think you’re missing anything, but “broken” isn’t quite the right word.
In a non-adversarial situation, you can come to some accommodation with the
other developer, depen
On 7/1/16, 4:26 PM, "Quincey Morris"
wrote:
>
>On Jul 1, 2016, at 13:03 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
>
> Just to clarify, there’s only one file extension in question here.
>
>
>
>
>Ah, apologies if I misread the original explanation.
>
>
>
> Our app declares an exported UTI for our file
On Jul 1, 2016, at 13:03 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, there’s only one file extension in question here.
Ah, apologies if I misread the original explanation.
> Our app declares an exported UTI for our file format, while the competitor’s
> app declares an imported UTI for our file
On July 1, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Quincey Morris
wrote:
>On Jul 1, 2016, at 09:18 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
>
> Steps to troubleshoot/rectify the issue?
>
>
>
>Since it’s hard to find out what’s going on with UTIs, I suggest you start by
>making sure your assumptions are correct. I’d try gett
Have you tried lsregister -dump?
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m having an issue where it appears that an Imported UTI for a certain file
> extension declared by one application is taking precedence over an Exported
> UTI for the same file extension declare
On Jul 1, 2016, at 09:18 , Matthew LeRoy wrote:
>
> steps to troubleshoot/rectify the issue?
Since it’s hard to find out what’s going on with UTIs, I suggest you start by
making sure your assumptions are correct. I’d try getting rid of the app that
has the imported UTI declaration (e.g. zip th
